Processing math: 100%

Zhang S L, Liu L W, Ren S, Li Z L, Zhao Y H et al. Recent advances in nonlinear optics for bio-imaging applications. Opto-Electron Adv 3, 200003 (2020). doi: 10.29026/oea.2020.200003
Citation: Zhang S L, Liu L W, Ren S, Li Z L, Zhao Y H et al. Recent advances in nonlinear optics for bio-imaging applications. Opto-Electron Adv 3, 200003 (2020). doi: 10.29026/oea.2020.200003

Review Open Access

Recent advances in nonlinear optics for bio-imaging applications

More Information
  • Nonlinear optics, which is a subject for studying the interaction between intense light and materials, has great impact on various research fields. Since many structures in biological tissues exhibit strong nonlinear optical effects, nonlinear optics has been widely applied in biomedical studies. Especially in the aspect of bio-imaging, nonlinear optical techniques can provide rapid, label-free and chemically specific imaging of biological samples, which enable the investigation of biological processes and analysis of samples beyond other microscopy techniques. In this review, we focus on the introduction of nonlinear optical processes and their applications in bio-imaging as well as the recent advances in this filed. Our perspective of this field is also presented.
  • Nonlinear optics usually describes elastic and inelastic light scattering phenomena from interactions between light and materials. Many materials exhibit intrinsic nonlinear optical properties. These nonlinear optical materials are widely used in photon generation, manipulation, transmission, detection, and imaging1-7. Some endogenous structures in biological samples also have capabilities to produce intrinsic nonlinear optical signals. Besides, materials which show strong nonlinear optical effects can serve as exogenous label of biological samples. Thus, nonlinear optics has been extensively explored for developing new research tools for biology, and are, in most cases, combined with microscopy, which further extends their applications in bio-imaging. Many nonlinear optical processes, such as multiphoton fluorescence, harmonic generation, four-wave mixing, stimulated Raman resonance and pump-probes have been implemented for the imaging of various biological samples. Nonlinear optical microscopy can provide label-free imaging, three-dimensional optical sectioning, and deep observation in tissues and can also reduce the photo damage to biological samples. In addition, nonlinear optics can provide chemical specific and high-speed imaging strategies, which enable the biomedical dynamic process studies. Firstly, we introduce the basic principles of the nonlinear optical processes. Next, we overview the conventional nonlinear optical materials and structures. Then we highlight several nonlinear optical processes which are extensively investigated for recent advances in bio-imaging applications. Lastly, we give our outlook in this field.

    Nonlinear optics is a branch of optics in which the interaction between intense light and matter is studied. The optical properties of a material system can be modified in response to the high-intensity coherent light, i.e. laser beam. This leads to the nonlinear optical processes, such as harmonic generation, four-wave mixing, multiphoton fluorescence, self-focusing, solitons and saturable absorption. The field of nonlinear optics started as the experiment of the second-harmonic generation by Franken et al. in 19618. This is the first nonlinear optical effect ever observed in an experiment, which occurred shortly after the laser was invented in 19609. After that, numerous nonlinear optical effects have been observed. All these nonlinear effects may consist of two aspects, firstly the medium produces nonlinear responses under the action of strong light, and then in reaction, modulation of incident light field by medium.

    When the electric field is applied to the material, the induced polarization P(t) can be expressed as a power series in terms of the electric field strength E(t):

    P(t)=ε0[χ(1)E(t)1+χ(2)E(t)2+χ(3)E(t)3+...], (1)

    where ε0 is the permittivity of free space; χ(1) is the linear susceptibility which describe the linear optics process; χ(2)andχ(3)are the second and third order nonlinear optical susceptibilities, respectively. When the incident light is strong enough, or the nonlinear optical susceptibilities are large, the nonlinear terms become non-ignorable. The output light frequency could be different from the input light frequency. The typical examples of second-order nonlinear optical effects include second-harmonic generation, sum-frequency generation, difference-frequency generation, and optical parametric amplification and oscillation. The third-order nonlinear optical effects include third-harmonic generation, four-wave mixing, and optical Kerr effect. The high-order nonlinear optical effects include higher order harmonic generation and higher order multiphoton fluorescence. These effects, especially the second- and third- order nonlinear optical effects, are widely applied in photon generation, frequency manipulation, and imaging.

    The second-order nonlinear optical processes come from the second-order contribution to nonlinear polarizatioP(2)(t)=ε0χ(2)E(t)2. In the case of the second-harmonic generation, incident beam with frequency ω converts to the radiation with frequency 2ω. The second-harmonic generation is due to the interaction and exchange of photons with different frequencies. Two photons of frequency ω are absorbed by the medium, and produce a photon of frequency 2ω simultaneously. For sum or difference frequency generation, the incident optical field containing two frequency components interacts within a second order nonlinear optical material. The various frequencies of the polarization could be produced, including 2ω1, 2ω2, ω1+ω2, and ω1-ω2. The latter two describe the process of sum-frequency generation and difference-frequency generation, respectively. Since the nonlinear polarization can only produce output signal efficiently when the condition of phase matching is satisfied, which can only occur for one frequency component. Thus, there is only one new major frequency that will be present in the radiation. In optical parametric amplification and oscillation, a weak input beam is amplified with the help of a strong high frequency pump beam through difference-frequency generation process. When an optical resonator is used to hold the nonlinear material, the radiation at lower frequencies can be largely amplified.

    The third-order nonlinear optical processes come from the third-order contribution to nonlinear polarizationP(3)(t)=ε0χ(3)E(t)3. As a typical third-order nonlinear optical process, the third-harmonic generation describes a process that a radiation with frequency 3ωis created by an incident field with frequency ω. In this process, three incident photons with frequency ω are destroyed and simultaneously one photon with frequency 3ω is created. In the four-wave mixing process, three input light of frequencies ω1, ω2, and ω3, interact with material and produce a signal at frequency ω4. The four-wave mixing output can be enhanced due to the vibrational or electronic properties of the materials. The coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, stimulated Raman scattering and optical Kerr effect are typical examples of vibrationally enhanced four-wave mixing. When the incident light field satisfies the material's electron transition resonance condition, the electronically enhanced four-wave mixing signal can be observed.

    It should be noted that the nonlinear optical susceptibility is a tensor, and it depends on the structures of materials. Actually, the independent component number of the tensor can be reduced due to intrinsic symmetry of the material. Thus, the nonlinear optical effects provide sensitive tools for detecting the orientation of materials. The second-order and other even-order nonlinear optical effects can only occur in the noncentrosymmetric materials. While the third-order nonlinear optical effects can occur in the materials regardless of being centrosymmetric or not1-2.

    According to the induced polarization formula, the materials for nonlinear optics should have large susceptibilities. Besides this basic requirement, the nonlinear optical materials also need to meet other conditions. For example, the materials should be chemically stable that could resist laser power; they should be transmissive and have fast response to the input laser pulse; for the second order or other even order nonlinear optical materials, there is an extra requirement of noncentrosymmetry.

    As discussed previously, only the materials without center of inversion symmetry can have a second-order nonlinear effect. Besides, the materials need to satisfy the standard phase matching to have a high efficiency of nonlinear process. The birefringent crystals that allow compensation for dispersion is an important category of second-order nonlinear optical materials, such as AgGaSe2, BaB2O4, LiIO3, LiNbO3, KH2PO4 and so on10. Since the birefringence phase matching suffers from the limited tuning wavelength range, small nonlinear coefficient, increased phase matching temperature, and difficult coupling angle, the approach of quasi-phase matching, which can periodically reverse the nonlinear interaction to compensate for phase mismatching, is preferred. The periodic poling to the materials is the commonly used method to realize it11. These periodically poled materials are one of the types of nonlinear optical materials, such as periodically poled KTiOPO412, RbTiOAsO413, LiTaO314-15, BaTiO316, and KNbO317. In addition, the electric asymmetric organic molecules which have large molecular hyperpolarizability can present second-order nonlinear optical effects. To build long-range ordered structures for realizing applicable scale of nonlinear optical effect, film structure is preferred.

    Some materials with nano or micro structures can present strong second-order nonlinear optical effects. The inorganic materials including ZnO16, KNbO319, GaN20, GaP21 and GaAs22-23 nanowires and atomically layered two-dimensional MoS224 and GaSe25 can realize second harmonic generation. The organic materials including tripeptides nanostructures26, dipeptides microtubes27, electrospun α-helical poly(α-Amino Acid) nanofibers28, and self-assembled 3–methyl–4-methoxy–4–nitrostilbene hexagonal micro-prisms29 also have shown strong second-harmonic generation.

    Third-order materials have the third-order nonlinear optical responses, leading to the processes such as two photon absorption and third-harmonic generation. The insulating crystals typically have third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities around 10-14–10-13 esu. Semiconductors often have larger third-order susceptibilities of 10-13–10-10 esu which is wavelength dependent. The susceptibility depends on the incident photon energy and the bandgap of the semiconductor. When the photon energy is smaller than the energy of bandgap, there is little difference between the semiconductors and the insulating crystals. When the photon energy is close to the bandgap energy, the excitation resonance is the main nonlinear optical mechanism in the semiconductors. When the photon energy is larger than the bandgap energy, the nonlinear response results from the electron excitation from valence band to conduction band, and leads to the change of optical properties of the materials30. Organic materials are another important category of third-order nonlinear optical materials, and large optical nonlinearities have been reported in them. For example, polydiacetylene and derivatives can have third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities around 10-10 esu. Organic molecules with metal ions like phthalocyanine and porphyrin31-33 also have promising third-order optical nonlinearities. Moreover, very strong nonlinear optical effects are often reported in the composite materials. For example, when embedding semiconductor or metal nanoparticles in glass with only a small volume concentration, the nonlinear susceptibility can be increased six orders larger than that of the glass34.

    Some nano or micro structures also have been built for realizing third-order nonlinear optical properties. For example, anisotropic two-photon excited fluorescence has been observed in ZnO nano/microwires35; two-photon pumped lasing has been achieved using CdS microwires36 and ZnO nanowires37 and nanoparticle38. Organic materials like 2-(N, N-diethylanilin-4-yl)-4, 6-bis (3, 5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)-1, 3, 5-triazine nanowires can serve as two-photon absorbers and waveguides39. In the hybrid material fabricated through embedding cationic dye 4-[p-(dimethylamino)styryl]-1-methylpyridinium to anionic metal-organic framework, two-photon pumped lasing was observed40.

    The nonlinear optical properties of materials play an important role in many optical applications, including bio-imaging, material structure analysis, optical signal processing, optical manipulation, photon generation, photon detection, and many others (Fig. 1). For bio-imaging specifically, various structures in biomedical samples show intrinsic nonlinear optical signals, and the signals can also be enhanced by extra nonlinear optical materials. Thus, the nonlinear optical imaging for biomedical applications has been extensively studied. Herein, our review focuses on the nonlinear optical bio-imaging and their recent advances.

    Figure 1.  Typical examples of nonlinear optics processes and applications.
    SHG: second-harmonic generation, SFG: sum-frequency generation, DFG: difference-frequency generation, OPA: optical parametric amplification, THG: third-harmonic generation, FWM: four-wave mixing, CRS: coherent Raman scattering, OKE: optical Kerr effect, HHG: high-harmonic generation, HOMF: high-order multiphoton fluorescence.

    To our knowledge, the nonlinear optical imaging techniques, including two-photon excited fluorescence, second-harmonic generation, third-harmonic generation, coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, stimulated Raman scattering and pump-probe imaging (Fig. 2), are promising in studying the biological samples, because of their high optical spatial and temporal resolution, no requirement for extra label, non-contact/non-destructive operation, and chemical specificity. Figure 3 shows the energy diagrams of these nonlinear optical processes.

    Figure 2.  Main nonlinear optical modalities applied to bioimaging.
    Figure 3.  Energy diagrams of nonlinear optical processes employed for the bio-imaging.
    TPEF: two-photon excited fluorescence. In this process, the material is excited by two photons with frequency of ω1 and emits a photon (ωTPEF) with higher energy than each incident photon. SHG: second-harmonic generation. In this process, two photons with frequency of ω1 are converted to one photon (ωSHG) with energy doubled of the incident photon. THG: third-harmonic generation. In this process, three photons are converted to one photon (ωTHG) with energy triple of the incident photon. CARS: coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. In this process, pump beam with frequency of ωp and Stokes beam with frequency of ωs interact with the material and generate a signal at anti-Stokes frequency ωas=2ωp-ωs. The signal can be enhanced when =ωp-ωs is close to the frequency of a vibrational energy state of a chemical bond in the sample. SRS: stimulated Raman scattering. In this process, when the frequency difference of pump beam and stokes beam , matches the vibrational resonance, a small part of the input energy transfers from one beam to the other. Pump-probe: in this process, a transient absorption is induced by the pump beam (ωp) and change the excited state of the material first. Then such change is detected by a probe beam (ωpr), and the dynamics of excited state can be deduced through varying the delay time between probe and pump beam pulses. The solid lines are the electronic and vibrational states, and the dashed lines are the virtual states.

    In the two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) process, which is the most common in multiphoton fluorescence process, the molecule is excited by the absorption of two photons simultaneously. This technique can prolong the incident light wavelength to infrared range, compared to the excitation by one photon in the range of ultraviolet or visible light. The infrared light can improve the penetration depth in the tissue and reduce potential photodamag41-42. Therefore, it is thought as one of the most popular noninvasive imaging tools which allows for imaging hundreds of microns deep in tissues (Fig. 4)43.

    Figure 4.  Two-photon excited fluorescence imaging of vasculature and neuron in vivo.
    (a) Three-dimensional imaging of layer V pyramidal neurons labeled with yellow fluorescent protein (left) and vasculature labeled with Texas Red (right), and excited by a fiber laser. (b) Selected z-sections of the merged stacks in (a). (c) Three-dimensional imaging of vasculature labeled with Texas Red, and excited with an optical parametric amplifier. (d) z-sections of the stacks in (c). (e) Vectorized vasculature in (c). The scale bar is 50 μm. Figure reproduced from: ref.43, Elsevier.

    The TPEF microscopy was first reported by Denk et al. in 1990. They demonstrated intrinsic three-dimensional spatial resolution with laser scanning44. The TPEF microscopy can image some of the endogenous fluorophores such as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH)45-47, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)48 and elastin49. These endogenous fluorophores whose absorption bands are in ultraviolet range can be excited by using infrared illumination50. Such intrinsic contrasts enable the investigation of native cell and tissue structures without introducing artificial label compounds. Yu et al. reported on two photon excited fluorescence polarization and lifetime imaging of intrinsic NADH in breast cancer and normal cells for quantitatively analyzing the concentration and ratio between two different conformations (free or enzyme bound) of NADH. They revealed the sensitivity in detecting intracellular NADH concentration and conformation to cell physiology at the single-cell level51. Kasischke et al. reported TPEF imaging of intrinsic NADH and their geometric association with the cortical microcirculation, revealing the well-defined boundaries of the tissue oxygen diffusion in mouse cortex52. Balu et al. monitored changes in two photon-excited NADH fluorescence in human epidermal cells during blood-supplied oxygen deprivation in vivo, noninvasively revealing the depth dependent sensitivity of keratinocytes to vascular oxygen supply and their metabolism in human skin53.

    To improve the resolution and penetration depth, the exogenous labeling of the biological structure of interest is usually needed in most cases. Synthetic dyes and fluorescent proteins are the most widely used labeling agents. Recently, Mansour et al. reported the in vivo two photon imaging of blood vessels and functional neuronal networks through the introduction of Texas Red dextran, genetic encoding green fluorescent protein, and calcium fluorescent protein indicator in human brain organoids, which are transplanted into the adult mouse brain54. New synthetic fluorescent probes with improved optical properties such as large two photon absorption cross section and high quantum yield, which could lower the excitation power and reduce the photodamage and photobleaching, are being continuously developed55-59. In addition, some nanoparticles with good two photon fluorescence properties, such as gold nanoparticles60-61, gold-silver hybrid nanoparticles61-63, upconverting nanoparticles64, surface modified carbon dots65-66, and polymer nanoparticles67-68, have been developed for in vivo TPEF imaging.

    The three-photon excitation can further prolong the incident light wavelength over the two-photon excitation. Xu's group demonstrated three-photon fluorescence imaging of subcortical structures in mouse brain at the spectral window of 1700 nm69. They also reported three-photon imaging for recording neurons activity in mouse brain70. Recently, they realized three-photon imaging of vasculature through mouse skull, and also calcium imaging in cortical layers in awake mice over weeks71. On the other hand, some researchers focused on the tissue heating problem of three-photon excitation which higher optical pulse power is needed. Recently, Rowlands et al. developed a wide field three-photon excitation scheme for imaging biological samples without causing photodamage72. Besides, Guesmi et al. reported an optimized multiband pulses source for three-photon excitation and realized fast deep tissue imaging with low tissue heating73. Moreover, they think the development of proper sources which can provide efficient three-photon excitation of biological samples is critical for three-photon bio-imaging application.

    In the second-harmonic generation (SHG) process, which is a second-order nonlinear optical process, two incident photons interact with the materials and convert to one emission photon with double of the excited photon energy. It can only occur in the noncentrosymmetric structures. Since some of the biological components can assemble into noncentrosymmetric structures, the second harmonic generation has been applied to image the biological structures such as collagen, microtubules and muscle myosin74-75. It is a sensitive label-free probe method, and the signal can be well separated from the auto-fluorescence of biological samples (Fig. 5).

    Figure 5.  Second harmonic generation imaging of the collagen tissues.
    (a) Self-assembled collagen gel. (b) Mouse dermis, (c) mouse bone. (d) Human ovary. Figure reproduced from: ref.83, Springer Nature.

    SHG is firstly reported in 19618 shortly after the invention of laser. Then the microscopic demonstration of the SHG appeared in 1970s76-77. In 1986, SHG imaging of the collagen fibers orientation in rat tail was shown by Freund et al.78 As it continues to develop, with SHG imaging with intrinsic contrast generated from collagen, microtubules and muscle myosin, people do not need to introduce extra labelling agents. Type–I collagen is the most abundant structural protein in human body79, thus the SHG signal can be effectively obtained from the cornea, the skin, bones or tendons80-85. These capabilities make SHG a powerful tool for biological researches and disease diagnosis. For example, SHG was reported to delineate breast cancers in different stages86-88; show the increase of collagen fiber formation in ovary cancers89-90; identify the tumor boundary in skin cancers91-94; detect fibrosis in liver and kidney95-96; diagnose connective tissue disorders such as Osteogenesis imperfect97, Sjogren's syndrome98 and skin damages99; and show collagen plaques intermingling with elastin in atherosclerosis100-101. Chen et al. provided the detailed strategy to obtain and quantitatively analyze the structural information on the arrangement of collagen in tissues83. Additionally, Prasad and Qu's teams applied SHG to produce light excitation of photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy102.

    Since many nanostructures also have intense SHG signals18, 19, 103-105, including ZnO nanowires18, GaN nanowires20, KNbO3 nanowires19, noble metallic nanoparticles106-108, Fe(IO3)3, KTiOPO4, BiTiO3 nanocrystals103, 104, 109110, some of them have been used as probes for specific biomolecules109. SHG signals can be used to track the nanoparticles in cells and tissues109-111. Magouroux et al. used KNbO3 nanoparticles to label the membrane of embryonic stem cells and monitored the evolution of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) by capturing ESC-derived cardiomyocytes beating within a three-dimensional cluster112. Recently, de Boer et al. demonstrated that second harmonic near infrared absorption of gold nanoparticles can optically evoke neuronal activity in mouse cortical neurons in acute slices and in vivo. And they also used this approach to stimulate individual epitheliomuscular cells and evoke body contractions in Hydra vulgaris113.

    In the third harmonic generation (THG) process, which is a third-order nonlinear optical process, three incident photons generate one photon with triple of the excited photon energy. The THG can occur in the materials regardless of their centrosymmetry, which is different from the SHG. Since its signal from homogenous material can vanish because of the Gouy phase shift of the incident field across the focus2, 114, it is sensitive to the interfaces and inhomogeneities. It has been applied to the imaging of biological samples without labels. Besides, the THG can prolong the excitation wavelength to near infrared (NIR) II range (1100–1350 nm). The light within this range can penetrate deeper in tissues than the NIR I (600–800 nm) light115. This feature makes THG a promising choice for deep tissue imaging.

    THG at the interface was firstly demonstrated using a focused intense femtosecond pulsed laser by Tsang in 1995116. Then the THG microscopy was reported by Barad et al. in 1997117. After that, THG microscopy was applied in biology. The live neurons in cell culture and yeast cells were imaged by Yelin et al. in 1999118. So far, the THG microscopy has been applied to the imaging of many biological samples, such as lipid bodies119, zebrafish embryos120-122, zebra fish nervous system120, vocal folds123, retina124, oral mucosa125-126, rat tympanic membrane127, bone128-129, fat tissue130, skin tissue94, 131-136, epithelial tissues131, 136-137, and brain structures69-71, 138-141. Recently, Kazarine et al. developed a technique of THG image scanning cytometry and applied it to malaria detection. The technique is based on their previous work that revealed hemozoin, which is a metabolic byproduct of the malaria parasite and present a significant third harmonic generation signal. They used this endogenous contrast to label-free image scanning cytometry of patient blood smears for the automated malaria detection142. ​Huizen et al. applied the THG combined SHG microscopy to imaging of fresh unprocessed healthy human tissue. They compared the images with the gold standard hematoxylin and eosin histological images and identify the key structural components in the tissue143.

    On the other hand, for long term cell tracking, non-bleachable THG contrast from nanoparticles is usually required. Since the THG signal from nanoparticles can be enhanced by surface plasmon resonances144, which commonly occur in gold145-146 and silver147-148 nanoparticles, it is feasible to image these nanoparticles through the THG microscopy and also make use of them as potential biomarkers. Besides, semiconductor nanomaterials, such as Si, ZnO and CdSe nanostructures, have also been found presenting the THG signals149-151. For example, Jung et al. reported imaging of Si nanowires with high resolution in vivo149. Recently, Dubreil et al. observed BiFeO3 nanoparticles labeled stem cells 1.3 mm deep in tissue by a 1300 nm femtosecond laser152. Lee et al. developed a new type of mesostructured α-FeOOH nanorods, which exhibit an enhanced THG signal under excited wavelength of 1230 nm because of the sub‐wavelength heterogeneity of refractive index. They also applied these nanorods as non-bleaching biocompatible third harmonic generation contrast agents for long-term observation in vivo (Fig. 6)153.

    Figure 6.  Third harmonic generation microscopic imaging of the tissues in vivo.
    (a) Third harmonic generation. (b) Second harmonic generation imaging of mouse ear in vivo. (c) Third harmonic generation and second harmonic generation. (d) Third harmonic generation imaging of the mouse ear after the injection of FeOOH nanoparticles. Size of view fields: (a, b) 240 µm × 240 µm, (c, d) 80 µm × 80 µm. Figure reproduced from: ref.153, Wiley-VCH.

    The coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) process is a vibrational resonance enhanced four-wave mixing process, which is a third-order nonlinear optical process. In this process, two beams, one is pump beam with frequency ωp and the other is Stokes beam with frequency ωs, interact with the material and generate a signal at anti-Stokes frequency 2ωp-ωs. The signal can be enhanced when ωp-ωs is close to the frequency of a vibrational energy state of a chemical bond in the sample. It can provide chemical contrast without exogenous labels, and has already been used in the label-free chemically specific imaging for characterization of biological samples (Fig. 7).

    Figure 7.  Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging of tissues with CH2 contrast.
    Image of (a) white adipose tissue in mouse omentum majus, (b) mouse lung tissue with alveoli, (c) adipocyte covered mouse kidney surface, (d) mouse kidney with renal tubules, (e) bovine retina cross section, and (f) human retina at the retinal surface. Figure reproduced from ref.172, Annual Reviews.

    The CARS process was first reported by Terhune and Maker in 1965154. And then the CARS spectroscopy was developed and used for chemical analysis155. In 1982, the CARS microscopy in two-dimension was reported by Duncan et al. In 1999, the three-dimensional CARS microscopy was developed for imaging live cells by Zumbusch et al.156 After that, the high-speed laser-scanning CARS microscopy157, Epi-detected CARS microscopy158, and multiplex CARS microscopy159-160 have been developed for biomedical applications. The CARS is a sensitive tool for probing strong CH-related vibrations in lipids. The signal allows for monitoring lipid metabolism in living cells and model organisms161-166 and lipid droplets transport, lipolysis and growth167-169. In addition, since the lipid structures are widely distributed in tissues, CARS imaging has been applied to many organism and tissue observation, such as observing skin170-171, adipose tissue, kidney tissue, retina172, lung tissue173, smooth muscle in colon174 and blood vessels175, nerve bundle176-179, and brain tissue180-181. Besides, the typically weak fingerprint region of Raman signals could be probed through intrapulse three colour excitation and non-resonant background amplification. This technique enables the identification of nuclei, collagen, protein, as well as lipid droplets in two- or three-dimensional tissues, expanding the prospect of CARS in biological imaging and potential clinic use182. Furthermore, CARS has also been used to identify healthy and diseased tissue in skin cancer171, colon cancer183-184, and brain cancer185.

    Recently, Karuna et al. reported label-free three-dimensional quantitative imaging of chemical composition of the human osteosarcoma cell division by using the hyperspectral CARS microscopy186. Niedieker et al. applied CARS imaging to characterize the myopathological features in muscles from patients with different myopathies, and to identify the distinct specific disease features187. Hirose et al. developed a CARS rigid endoscope using two individual optical fibers to image rat sciatic nerves and also rabbit prostatic fascia without sample slicing, which revealed the potential application of the CARS endoscope to robot-assisted surgery188.

    The CARS microscopy also serves as a tool to map the drug molecules dynamics without any fluorescent labels. For example, Kang et al. visualized the distribution and release of paclitaxel in a polymer matrix189; Hartshorn et al. mapped the chemical components in indomethacin tablets190; Fussell et al. studied the distribution of micronized salmeterol xinafoate and budesonide on the surface of lactose carrier191. Additionally, CARS is sensitive to polymer-based nanoparticles because of their abundant C-H bonds. The CARS has been used to observe the intracellular trafficking of the nanoparticle drug carriers and monitor the drug release process192-195.

    The stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) process is another vibrational resonance enhanced four-wave mixing process. In this process, when the frequency difference of two incident beams, pump beam and stokes beam, matches the vibrational resonance, a small part of the input energy transfers from one beam to the other. The intensity of one beam is modulated in response to the variation, and this modulation can be transferred to the other beam. In such process, the intensity of Stokes beam has a gain and pump beam has a loss. The SRS signal can be measured by sensitive photodetection, such as lock-in amplifier196-201 or tuned amplifier202. The main advantage of SRS over CARS is the absence of non-resonance background. Some examples of stimulated Raman scattering imaging of biological samples are shown in Fig. 8.

    Figure 8.  Stimulated Raman scattering imaging of biological samples.
    (a) Image of chemical mapping of C. elegans intracellular compartments, LROs: lysosome-related organelles, the scale bar is 50 mm. (b) Live HeLa cells, left: signals from C-D (2133 cm-1) showing deuterium-labeled amino acids, right: signals from C-H (2845 cm-1), the scale bars is 10 μm. (c) Phenyl-diyne cholesterol in C. elegans, left: signal from C≡C (2247 cm-1) showing distinct cholesterol store, right: signal from C-H rich fat store (2885 cm-1), the scale bars is 10 mm. (d) Left: time-lapse of HeLa cell division, DNA (magenta), lipids (green); right: section of normal human skin tissue, DNA (magenta), lipids (green), the scale bar is 20 mm. (e) Drug tablets, green: microcrystalline cellulose, blue: dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous, red: the drug amlodipine besylate, yellow/orange: sodium starch glycolate, magenta: magnesium stearate, the scale bars is 200 mm. Figure reproduced from ref.203, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    The SRS process was first reported in 1962204. After that, the SRS spectroscopy with continuous-wave laser was developed in 1977205. In 2007, the SRS imaging was demonstrated on polystyrene beads with femtosecond laser206. In 2008, Xie's group demonstrated highly sensitive imaging of biological samples with picosecond laser, and opened the new era of SRS microscopy for biomedical imaging196. SRS provides a new tool for lipid study without non-resonant background. It has been applied to the study of fat storage in C. elegans207, transport of lipid droplets in early fruit fly embryos208, fat droplets, cholesterol-rich lysosomes, and lipid oxidation in C. elegans209, and myelin sheaths in Xenopus laevis tadpoles210. SRS microscopy also allowed for co-mapping of lipids, protein, and DNA, through their distinct features in the C-H stretching vibration region. This enabled the multicolored stain-free histopathology of cells and organs tissues, such as skin and brain tissues, and is comparable with the conventional hematoxylin and eosin based histopathology211-214. Some biochemicals, such as cholesterol, glyceryl trioleate and bovine serum albumin, can also be detected through their fingerprint Raman spectra. Cholesterol storage in intact atherosclerotic arterial tissues215 and Esterified cholesterol accumulation in prostate cancer and metastases214 were imaged by SRS microscopy. High-level unsaturated lipids were detected in ovarian cancer stem cells by SRS microscopy216. Furthermore, SRS microscopy was applied to identify squamous cell carcinoma in human skin tissue217, and detect brain tumor in mice in vivo218. The Raman spectroscopy has been used for brain tumor detection during surgery on a patient219. Recently, Ji et al. applied SRS microscopy to image amyloid plaques in brain tissue from the mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. They distinguished misfolded protein in Alzheimer's diseased brain tissues through SRS spectral blue shift of the amide I band. This method provided a new tool to study Alzheimer's disease and other protein misfolding associated neurodegenerative diseases220. Yan et al. applied hyperspectral SRS microscopy to image the lipid metabolites in normal and cancerous liver tissues from patients, and found aberrant accumulation of saturated fat in human liver cancer. Their finding revealed that saturated fat played an important role in liver cancer development and could serve as a potential biomarker for liver cancer 221.

    Besides, isotope substitution has been developed for Raman contrast, since the C-D bond Raman spectra can be separated from the endogenous Raman features. For example, deuterated fatty acids were imaged to study the conversion of palmitic acid into lipid droplets in live cells and the fat storage in C. elegans199; deuterated amino acids were used to image the protein synthesis in cells222; deuterated glucose was used to visualize de novo lipogenesis in pancreatic cancer cells223. 13C-labeled phenylalanine also served as Raman contrast and was used to monitor proteome degradation process in cells224. Recently, Li et al. applied multiple vibrational tags, including alkyne-tagged fatty acid, deuterium-labeled saturated fatty acid and unsaturated fatty acid, to image the lipid synthesis and lipolysis in C. elegans225.

    SRS microscopy has also been applied to monitor the drug molecules using chemical Raman fingerprint. For example, Slipchenko et al. mapped the active pharmaceutical ingredient and excipients in amlodipine besylate tablets226; Fu et al. imaged the tyrosine kinase inhibitors distribution in living cells227; Chiu et al. measured the deuterated water, propylene glycol and dimethyl sulphoxide molecular diffusion in the human nail228.

    The pump-probe transient absorption technique can be used to detect the molecules that have no fluorescence because of non-radiative decay from the excited state, and it is based on the third-order nonlinear optics. In this process, a transient absorption is induced by the pump beam and changes the excited state of the material first. Then such change is detected by a probe beam, and the dynamics of the excited state can be deduced through varying the delay time between probe and pump beam pulses. This technique has been used for imaging non-fluorescent chromophores, such as cytochromes and hemoglobin229-231.

    The transient absorption microscopy was firstly applied in biology for measuring dye fluorescence lifetime in cells by Dong et al. in 1990s232. Then in 2007, the transient absorption imaging with high frequency modulation was reported by Fu et al. and used for imaging melanin and oxy-/ deoxyhemoglobin233-234. Min et al. demonstrated the three-dimensional imaging of non-fluorescent chromoproteins, chromogenic reporter in gene expression, transdermal drug distributions, and microvasculature which is based on hemoglobin235. Besides, the transient absorption microscopy can differentiate eumelanin and pheomelanin, which are two types of melanins, due to their different transient absorptive response236. The transient absorption imaging has been used to monitor melanoma progression237 and assess metastatic potential of melanomas238. Recently, Chen et al. studied the dynamics of heme storage and distribution in C. elegans by using high-resolution transient absorption microscopy239 (Fig. 9). Dong et al. applied transient absorption imaging to differentiate glycated hemoglobin from hemoglobin due to their different excited state dynamics. They studied heme modification and quantified the glycated hemoglobin fraction at single red blood cell level. They found that the distribution of glycated hemoglobin fraction was different in diabetic whole blood from that in healthy whole blood. They also developed a mathematical model to derive the blood glucose concentration and monitored the long-term bloodstream glucose concentration240.

    Figure 9.  Transient absorption imaging of heme granule dynamics in C. elegans.
    (a) Image of C. elegans at time zero, arrow: heme granule, blue line: worm intestinal membrane outline, the scale bar is 40 μm. (b) Enlarged view of heme granule in the white box of (a) at different time points. Figure reproduced from: ref.239, American Society of Chemistry.

    Moreover, transient absorption imaging can also be realized through exogenous contrast agents such as nanoparticles. The non-fluorescent contrasts have been generated from several nanostructures in biological samples, including semiconducting and metallic carbon nanotubes241, nanodiamonds242, gold nanorods243 and graphene/graphene oxide244.

    Nonlinear optics can provide label-free, chemical specific and high-speed imaging strategies, which facilitate the studies of the biomedical dynamic process both in vitro and in vivo. It plays an important role in the bio-imaging for decades. Each nonlinear optical imaging strategy has distinct viability to certain structures or molecules. This is the advantage of nonlinear optical imaging. On the other hand, each nonlinear optical imaging strategy may rely on specific chemicals or certain optical probes, not able to simultaneously observe different structures and interaction in bio-samples. To visualize the complex biological system, the combination of these nonlinear optical imaging techniques is desired. This promotes the development of multimodal nonlinear optical imaging platforms. The two/three-photon excited fluorescence microscopy and second-/third-harmonic generation microscopy are one-beam systems. The coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, stimulated Raman scattering and pump-probe transient absorption microscopy are two-beam systems. The two-beam system coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy can serve as a base platform for building other nonlinear optical modules. Such integration enables the simultaneous visualization of different structures or molecules and even their interaction in the complex biological samples. In our opinion, the current development bottleneck of nonlinear optical bio-imaging is in the aspects of imaging depth, spatial resolution, detection sensitivity and acquisiton speed. Although many exciting developments have been made, to achieve the goal of clinic translation, new technical breakthroughs are still needed. The further improvement on imaging depth, spatial resolution, detection sensitivity and acquisition speed is expected. For deeper imaging, new active focusing technique, or the optical fiber delivery, even endoscopy may be the direction of development. For higher spatial resolution, the combination with the super resolution imaging techniques could be a direction. For increasing the detection sensitivity, especially to achieve the single molecule detection, combining the coherent Raman scattering microscopy with force measurement of chemical bond vibration may be a solution. For higher acquisition speed, frequency multiplexed schemes245 could be used to monitor fast process. As more breakthrough emerges, the nonlinear optical imaging is believed to have great promise to become a powerful tool for both fundamental biomedical studies, and clinic application such as diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation.

    This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61722508/ 61525503/ 61620106016/ 61835009/ 61935012/ 61961136005), (Key) Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2016KCXTD007), and Shenzhen Basic Research Project (JCYJ20180305124902165).

    The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • [1] Shen Y R. The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley Press, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar

    [2] Boyd R W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, New York, 2007).

    Google Scholar

    [3] Agrawal G P. Applications of Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, London, 2001).

    Google Scholar

    [4] Saleh B E A, Teich M C. Fundamentals of Photonics 2nd ed (Wiley, Hoboken, 2007).

    Google Scholar

    [5] Garmire E. Nonlinear optics in daily life. Opt Exp 21, 30532–30544 (2013). doi: 10.1364/OE.21.030532

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Chen L W, Zhou Y, Wu M X, Hong M H. Remote-mode microsphere nano-imaging: new boundaries for optical microscopes. Opto Electron Adv 1, 170001 (2018).

    Google Scholar

    [7] Liu Z X, Jiang M L, Hu Y L, Lin F, Shen B et al. Scanning cathodoluminescence microscopy: applications in semiconductor and metallic nanostructures. Opto-Electron Adv 1, 180007 (2018).

    Google Scholar

    [8] Franken P A, Hill A E, Peters C W, Weinreich G.Generation of optical harmonics. Phys Rev Lett 7, 118–119 (1961). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.7.118

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Maiman T H. Optical and microwave-optical experiments in ruby. Phys Rev Lett 4, 564–566 (1960). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.564

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Nikogosyan D N. Nonlinear Optical Crystals: A Complete Survey (Springer, New York, 2005).

    Google Scholar

    [11] Myers L E, Bosenberg W R. Periodically poled lithium niobate and quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillators. IEEE J Quantum Electron 33, 1663–1672 (1997). doi: 10.1109/3.631262

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Chen Q, Risk W P. Periodic poling of KTiOPO4 using an applied electric field. Electron Lett 30, 1516–1517 (1994). doi: 10.1049/el:19941019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Karlsson H, Laurell F, Henriksson P, Arvidsson G.Frequency doubling in periodically poled RbTiOAsO4. Electron Lett 32, 556–557 (1996). doi: 10.1049/el:19960402

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Mizuuchi K, Yamamoto K. Generation of 340-nm light by frequency doubling of a laser diode in bulk periodically poled LiTaO3. Opt Lett 21, 107–109 (1996). doi: 10.1364/OL.21.000107

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Meyn J P, Fejer M M. Tunable ultraviolet radiation by second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium tantalate. Opt Lett 22, 1214–1216 (1997). doi: 10.1364/OL.22.001214

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Setzler S D, Schunemann P G, Pollak T M, Pomeranz L A, Missey M J. Advanced Solid-State Lasers, OSA Trends in Optics and Photonics Series. Washington DC: Optical Society of America, 1999: 676.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Meyn J P, Klein M E, Woll D, Wallenstein R, Rytz D.Periodically poled potassium niobate for second-harmonic generation at 463 nm. Opt Lett 24, 1154–1156 (1999). doi: 10.1364/OL.24.001154

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Johnson J C, Yan H Q, Schaller R D, Petersen P B, Yang P D et al.Near-field imaging of nonlinear optical mixing in single zinc oxide nanowires. Nano Lett 2, 279–283 (2002). doi: 10.1021/nl015686n

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Nakayama Y, Pauzauskie P J, Radenovic A, Onorato R M, Saykally R J et al.Tunable nanowire nonlinear optical probe. Nature 447, 1098–1101 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nature05921

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Long J P, Simpkins B S, Rowenhorst D J, Pehrsson P E.Far-field imaging of optical second-harmonic generation in single GaN nanowires. Nano Lett 7, 831–836 (2007). doi: 10.1021/nl0624420

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Sanatinia R, Swillo M, Anand S. Surface second-harmonic generation from vertical GaP nanopillars. Nano Lett 12, 820–826 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl203866y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Casadei A, Pecora E F, Trevino J, Forestiere C, Rüffer D et al.Photonic-plasmonic coupling of GaAs single nanowires to optical nanoantennas. Nano Lett 14, 2271–2278 (2014). doi: 10.1021/nl404253x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Bautista G, Mäkitalo J, Chen Y, Dhaka V, Grasso M et al.Second-harmonic generation imaging of semiconductor nanowires with focused vector beams. Nano Lett 15, 1564–1569 (2015). doi: 10.1021/nl503984b

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Yin X B, Ye Z L, Chenet D A, Ye Y, O'Brien K et al.Edge nonlinear optics on a MoS2 atomic monolayer. Science 344, 488–490 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1250564

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Zhou X, Cheng J X, Zhou Y B, Cao H, Hong H et al.Strong second-harmonic generation in atomic layered GaSe. J Am Chem Soc 137, 7994–7997 (2015). doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04305

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Handelman A, Lavrov S, Kudryavtsev A, Khatchatouriants A, Rosenberg Y et al. Nonlinear optical bioinspired peptide nanostructures. Adv Opt Mater 1, 875–884 (2013). doi: 10.1002/adom.201300282

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Semin S, Van Etteger A, Cattaneo L, Amdursky N, Kulyuk L et al.Strong thermo-induced single and two-photon green luminescence in self-organized peptide microtubes. Small 11, 1156–1160 (2015). doi: 10.1002/smll.201401602

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Farrar D, Ren K L, Cheng D, Kim S, Moon W et al.Permanent polarity and piezoelectricity of electrospun α-Helical Poly(α-Amino Acid) Fibers. Adv Mat 23, 3954–3958 (2011). doi: 10.1002/adma.201101733

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Zhang H H, Liao Q, Wang X D, Xu Z Z, Fu H B.Self-assembled organic hexagonal micro-prisms with high second harmonic generation efficiency for photonic devices. Nanoscale 7, 10186–10192 (2015). doi: 10.1039/C5NR00365B

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Gibbs H M, Khitrova G, Peyghambarian N. Nonlinear Photonics (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

    Google Scholar

    [31] Philip R, Ravikanth M, Ravindra Kumar G. Studies of third order optical nonlinearity in iron (III) phthalocyanine μ-oxo dimers using picosecond four-wave mixing. Opt Comm 165, 91–97 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00231-X

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] de la Torre G, Vázquez P, Agulló-López, Torres T.Role of structural factors in the nonlinear optical properties of phthalocyanines and related compounds. Chem Rev 104, 3723–3750 (2004). doi: 10.1021/cr030206t

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Senge M O, Fazekas M, Notaras E G A, Blau W J, Zawadzka M et al.Nonlinear optical properties of porphyrins. Adv Mat 19, 2737–2774 (2007). doi: 10.1002/adma.200601850

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Xu J, Boyd R W, Fischer G L. Nonlinear optical materials. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, Elsevier (2016).

    Google Scholar

    [35] Wang K, Zhou J, Yuan L Y, Tao Y T, Chen J et al.Anisotropic third-order optical nonlinearity of a single ZnO micro/nanowire. Nano Lett 12, 833–838 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl203884j

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Zhang L C, Wang K, Liu Z, Yang G, Shen G Z et al.Two-photon pumped lasing in a single CdS microwire. Appl Phys Lett 102, 211915 (2013). doi: 10.1063/1.4809537

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Zhang C F, Zhang F, Xia T, Kumar N, Hahm J I et al.Low-threshold two-photon pumped ZnO nanowire lasers. Opt Express 17, 7893–7900 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OE.17.007893

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Chelnokov E V, Bityurin N.Two-photon pumped random laser in nanocrystalline ZnO. Appl Phy. Lett 89, 171119 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2370879

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] HYPERLINK \l "_bookmark84" Zhang C, Zou C L, Yan Y L, Hao R, Sun F W et al. Two-photon pumped lasing in single-crystal organic nanowire exciton polariton resonators. J Am Chem Soc 133, 7276–7279 (2011). doi: 10.1021/ja200549v

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] Yu J C, Cui Y J, Xu H, Yang Y, Wang Z Y et al.Confinement of pyridinium hemicyanine dye within an anionic metal-organic framework for two-photon-pumped lasing. Nat Comm 4, 2719 (2013). doi: 10.1038/ncomms3719

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Helmchen F, Denk W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods 2, 932–940 (2005). doi: 10.1038/nmeth818

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Schenke-Layland K, Riemann I, Damour O, Stock U A, König K.Two-photon microscopes and in vivo multiphoton tomographs-Powerful diagnostic tools for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58, 878–896 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Miller D R, Jarrett J W, Hassan A M, Dunn A K.Deep tissue imaging with multiphoton fluorescence microscopy. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 4, 32–39 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.09.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Denk W, Strickler J H, Webb W W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990). doi: 10.1126/science.2321027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Piston D W, Kirby M S, Cheng H, Lederer W J, Webb W W.Two-photon-excitation fluorescence imaging of three-dimensional calcium-ion activity. Appl Opt 33, 662–669 (1994). doi: 10.1364/AO.33.000662

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Patterson G H, Knobel S M, Arkhammar P, Thastrup O, Piston D W.Separation of the glucose-stimulated cytoplasmic and mitochondrial NAD(P)H responses in pancreatic islet β cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 5203–5207 (2000). doi: 10.1073/pnas.090098797

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Bennett B D, Jetton T L, Ying G T, Magnuson M A, Piston D W.Quantitative subcellular imaging of glucose metabolism within intact pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 271, 3647–3651 (1996). doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3647

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Huang S H, Heikal A A, Webb W W. Two-photon fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy of NAD(P)H and flavoprotein. Biophys J 82, 2811–2825 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75621-X

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [49] Deyl Z, Macek K, Adam M, Vančíková.Studies on the chemical nature of elastin fluorescence. Biochimi Biophys Acta 625, 248–254 (1980). doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90288-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Zipfel W R, Williams R M, Christie R, Nikitin A Y, Hyman B T et al.Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 7075–7080 (2003). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0832308100

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Yu Q R, Heikal A A. Two-photon autofluorescence dynamics imaging reveals sensitivity of intracellular NADH concentration and conformation to cell physiology at the single-cell level. J Photochem Photobiol B 95, 46–57 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Kasischke K A, Lambert E M, Panepento B, Sun A, Gelbard H A et al.Two-photon NADH imaging exposes boundaries of oxygen diffusion in cortical vascular supply regions. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31, 68–81 (2010).

    Google Scholar

    [53] Balu M, Mazhar A, Hayakawa C K, Mittal R, Krasieva T B et al.In vivo multiphoton NADH fluorescence reveals depth-dependent keratinocyte metabolism in human skin. Biophys J 104, 258–267 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3809

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Mansour A A, Gonçalves J T, Bloyd C W, Li H, Fernandes S et al.An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat Biotechnol 36, 432–441 (2018). doi: 10.1038/nbt.4127

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Mei J, Huang Y H, Tian H. Progress and trends in AIE-based bioprobes: a brief overview. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10, 12217–12261 (2018). doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b14343

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Collot M, Fam T K, Ashokkumar P, Faklaris O, Galli T et al.Ultrabright and fluorogenic probes for multicolor imaging and tracking of lipid droplets in cells and tissues. J Am Chem Soc 140, 5401–5411 (2018). doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12817

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Lou X D, Zhao Z J, Tang B Z. Organic dots based on AIEgens for two-photon fluorescence bioimaging. Small 12, 6430–6450 (2016). doi: 10.1002/smll.201600872

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Ding D, Goh C C, Feng G X, Zhao Z J, Liu J et al.Ultrabright organic dots with aggregation-induced emission characteristics for real-time two-photon intravital vasculature imaging. Adv Mat 25, 6083–6088 (2013). doi: 10.1002/adma.201301938

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Yi R X, Das P, Lin F R, Shen B L, Yang Z G et al.Fluorescence enhancement of small squaraine dye and its two-photon excited fluorescence in long-term near-infrared I & II bioimaging. Opt Express 27, 12360–12372 (2019). doi: 10.1364/OE.27.012360

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Wang H F, Huff T B, Zweifel D A, He W, Low P S et al. In vitro and in vivo two-photon luminescence imaging of single gold nanorods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15752–15756 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504892102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Rane T D, Armani A M. Two-photon microscopy analysis of gold nanoparticle uptake in 3D cell spheroids. PLoS One 11, e0167548 (2016). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167548

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Tong L, Cobley C M, Chen J Y, Xia Y N, Cheng J X.Bright three-photon luminescence from gold/silver alloyed nanostructures for bioimaging with negligible photothermal toxicity. Angew Chem Int Ed 49, 3485–3488 (2010). doi: 10.1002/anie.201000440

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Au L, Zhang Q, Cobley C M, Gidding M, Schwartz A G et al.Quantifying the cellular uptake of antibody-conjugated Au nanocages by two-photon microscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. ACS Nano 4, 35–42 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nn901392m

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Park Y I, Lee K T, Suh Y D, Hyeon T.Upconverting nanoparticles: a versatile platform for wide-field two-photon microscopy and multi-modal in vivo imaging. Chem Soc Rev 44, 1302–1317 (2015). doi: 10.1039/C4CS00173G

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Yang S T, Cao L, Luo P G, Lu F S, Wang X et al.Carbon dots for optical imaging in vivo. J Am Chem Soc 131, 11308–11309 (2009). doi: 10.1021/ja904843x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Li D, Jing P T, Sun L H, An Y, Shan X Y et al.Near-infrared excitation/emission and multiphoton-induced fluorescence of carbon dots. Adv Mat 30, 1705913 (2018). doi: 10.1002/adma.201705913

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] Wu C F, Chiu D T. Highly fluorescent semiconducting polymer dots for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed 52, 3086–3109 (2013). doi: 10.1002/anie.201205133

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [68] Gao Y T, Feng G X, Jiang T, Goh C, Ng L et al.Biocompatible Nanoparticles based on diketo-pyrrolo-pyrrole (DPP) with aggregation-induced Red/NIR emission for in vivo two-photon fluorescence imaging. Adv Funct Mater 25, 2857–2866 (2015). doi: 10.1002/adfm.201500010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Horton N G, Wang K, Kobat D, Clark C G, Wise F W et al. In vivo three-photon microscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain. Nat Photon 7 205–209 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.336

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [70] Ouzounov D G, Wang T Y, Wang M R, Feng D D, Horton N G et al. In vivo three-photon imaging of activity of GCaMP6-labeled neurons deep in intact mouse brain. Nat Methods 14, 388–390 (2017). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4183

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Wang T Y, Ouzounov D G, Wu C Y, Horton N G, Zhang B et al.Three-photon imaging of mouse brain structure and function through the intact skull. Nat Methods 15, 789–792 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0115-y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Rowlands C J, Park D, Bruns O T, Piatkevich K D, Fukumura D et al.Wide-field three-photon excitation in biological samples. Light Sci Appl 6, e16255 (2017). doi: 10.1038/lsa.2016.255

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Guesmi K, Abdeladim L, Tozer S, Mahou P, Kumamoto T et al.Dual-color deep-tissue three-photon microscopy with a multiband infrared laser. Light Sci Appl 7, 12 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0012-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] Campagnola P J, Loew L M. Second-harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1356–1360 (2003). doi: 10.1038/nbt894

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [75] Mohler W, Millard A C, Campagnola P J.Second harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins. Methods 29, 97–109 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00292-X

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [76] Hellwarth R, Christensen P. Nonlinear optical microscopic examination of structure in polycrystalline ZnSe. Opt Comm 12, 318–322 (1974). doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(74)90024-8

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [77] Sheppard C, Gannaway J, Kompfner R, Walsh D.The scanning harmonic optical microscope. IEEE J Quantum Electron 13, 912 (1977).

    Google Scholar

    [78] Freund I, Deutsch M, Sprecher A. Connective tissue polarity. Optical second-harmonic microscopy, crossed-beam summation, and small-angle scattering in rat-tail tendon. Biophys J 50, 693–712 (1986). doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83510-X

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [79] Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser C A, Krieger M, Bretscher A et al. Molecular Cell Biology 7th ed (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 2013).

    Google Scholar

    [80] Bueno J M, Ávila F J, Artal P. Second harmonic generation microscopy: a tool for quantitative analysis of tissues, Microscopy and Analysis. London: IntechOpen, 2016: 19–27.

    Google Scholar

    [81] Campagnola P. Second harmonic generation imaging microscopy: applications to diseases diagnostic. Anal Chem 83, 3224–3231 (2011). doi: 10.1021/ac1032325

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [82] Gusachenko I, Tran V, Houssen Y G, Allain J M, Schanne-Klein M C. Polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation in tendon upon mechanical stretching. Biophys J 102, 2220–2229 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.068

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [83] Chen X Y, Nadiarynkh O, Plotnikov S, Campagnola P J.Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure. Nat Protoc 7, 654–669 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [84] Lo W, Chen W L, Hsueh C M, Ghazaryan A A, Chen S J et al. Fast Fourier transform-based analysis of second-harmonic generation Image in keratoconic cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53, 3501–3507 (2012). doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6697

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [85] Tan H Y, Chang Y L, Lo W, Hsueh C M, Chen W L et al.Characterizing the morphologic changes in collagen crosslinked–treated corneas by Fourier transform–second harmonic generation imaging. J Cat Refract Surg 39, 779–788 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.036

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [86] Provenzano P P, Eliceiri K W, Campbell J M, Inman D R, White J G et al. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med 4, 38 (2006). doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-38

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [87] Conklin M W, Eickhoff J C, Riching K M, Pehlke C A, Eliceiri K W et al.Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol 178, 1221–1232 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.076

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [88] Sahai E, Wyckoff J, Philippar U, Segall J E, Gertler F et al.Simultaneous imaging of GFP, CFP and collagen in tumors in vivo using multiphoton microscopy. BMC Biotechnol 5, 14 (2005). doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-5-14

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [89] Kirkpatrick N D, Brewer M A, Utzinger U. Endogenous optical biomarkers of ovarian cancer evaluated with multiphoton microscopy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16, 2048–2057 (2007). doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [90] Nadiarnykh O, LaComb R B, Brewer M A, Campagnola P J.Alterations of the extracellular matrix in ovarian cancer studied by second harmonic generation imaging microscopy. BMC Cancer 10, 94 (2010). doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-94

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [91] Lin S J, Jee S H, Kuo C J, Wu R J, Lin W C et al.Discrimination of basal cell carcinoma from normal dermal stroma by quantitative multiphoton imaging. Opt Lett 31, 2756–2758 (2006). doi: 10.1364/OL.31.002756

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [92] Cicchi R, Massi D, Sestini S, Carli P, De Giorgi V et al.Multidimensional non-linear laser imaging of Basal Cell Carcinoma. Opt Express 15, 10135–10148 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OE.15.010135

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [93] Dimitrow E, Ziemer M, Koehler M J, Norgauer J, König K et al. Sensitivity and specificity of multiphoton laser tomography for in vivo and ex vivo diagnosis of malignant melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 129, 1752–1758 (2009). doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.439

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [94] Chen S Y, Chen S U, Wu H Y, Lee W J, Liao Y H et al. In vivo virtual biopsy of human skin by using noninvasive higher harmonic generation microscopy. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 16, 478–492 (2010). doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2031987

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [95] Sun W X, Chang S, Tai D C S, Tan N, Xiao G F et al. Nonlinear optical microscopy: use of second harmonic generation and two-photon microscopy for automated quantitative liver fibrosis studies. J Biomed Opt 13, 064010 (2008). doi: 10.1117/1.3041159

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [96] Strupler M, Pena A M, Hernest M, Tharaux P L, Martin J L et al.Second harmonic imaging and scoring of collagen in fibrotic tissues. Opt Express 15, 4054–4065 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OE.15.004054

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [97] Lacomb R, Nadiarnykh O, Campagnola P J. Quantitative Second Harmonic Generation imaging of the diseased state osteogenesis imperfecta: experiment and simulation. Biophys J 94, 4504–4514 (2008). doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.114405

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [98] Schenke-Layland K, Xie J S, Angelis E, Starcher B, Wu K J et al.Increased degradation of extracellular matrix structures of lacrimal glands implicated in the pathogenesis of Sjögren's syndrome. Matrix Biol 27, 53–66 (2008).

    Google Scholar

    [99] Lin S J, Wu R E, Tan H Y, Lo W, Lin W C et al. Evaluating cutaneous photoaging by use of multiphoton fluorescence and second-harmonic generation microscopy. Opt Lett 30, 2275–2277 (2005). doi: 10.1364/OL.30.002275

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [100] Le T T, Langohr I, Locker M J, Sturek M, Cheng J X.Label-free molecular imaging of atherosclerotic lesions using multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy. J Biomed Opt 12, 054007 (2007). doi: 10.1117/1.2795437

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [101] Kwon G P, Schroeder J L, Amar M J, Remaley A T, Balaban R S et al.Contribution of macromolecular structure to the retention of low-density lipoprotein at arterial branch points. Circulation 117, 2919–2927 (2008). doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.754614

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [102] Kachynski A V, Pliss A, Kuzmin A N, Ohulchanskyy T Y, Baev A et al.Photodynamic therapy by in situ nonlinear photon conversion. Nat Photonics 8, 455–461 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.90

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [103] Bonacina L, Mugnier Y, Courvoisier F, Le Dantec R, Extermann J et al. Polar Fe(IO3)3 nanocrystals as local probes for nonlinear microscopy. Appl Phys B 87, 399–403 (2007).

    Google Scholar

    [104] Le X L, Zhou C Y, Slablab A, Chauvat D, Tard C et al. Photostable second-harmonic generation from a single KTiOPO4 nanocrystal for nonlinear microscopy. Small 4, 1332–1336 (2008). doi: 10.1002/smll.200701093

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [105] Kachynski A V, Kuzmin A N, Nyk M, Roy I, Prasad P N. Zinc oxide nanocrystals for nonresonant nonlinear optical microscopy in biology and medicine. J Phys Chem C 112, 10721–10724 (2008).

    Google Scholar

    [106] Butet J, Bachelier G, Russier-Antoine I, Jonin C, Benichou E et al.Interference between selected dipoles and octupoles in the optical second-harmonic generation from spherical gold nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett 105, 077401 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.077401

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [107] Butet J, Duboisset J, Bachelier G, Russier-Antoine I, Benichou E et al.Optical second harmonic generation of single metallic nanoparticles embedded in a homogeneous medium. Nano Lett 10, 1717–1721 (2010). doi: 10.1021/nl1000949

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [108] Zavelani-Rossi M, Celebrano M, Biagioni P, Polli D, Finazzi M et al.Near-field second-harmonic generation in single gold nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 92, 093119 (2008). doi: 10.1063/1.2889450

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [109] Hsieh C L, Grange R, Pu Y, Psaltis D.Bioconjugation of barium titanate nanocrystals with immunoglobulin G antibody for second harmonic radiation imaging probes. Biomaterials 31, 2272–2277 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.096

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [110] Pantazis P, Maloney J, Wu D, Fraser S E.Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 14535–14540 (2010). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004748107

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [111] Kuo T R, Wu C L, Hsu C T, Lo W, Chiang S J et al.Chemical enhancer induced changes in the mechanisms of transdermal delivery of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 30, 3002–3008 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [112] Magouroux T, Extermann J, Hoffmann P, Mugnier Y, Dantec R L et al.High-speed tracking of murine cardiac stem cells by harmonic nanodoublers. Small 8, 2752–2756 (2012).

    Google Scholar

    [113] de Boer W D A M, Hirtz J J, Capretti A, Gregorkiewicz T, Izquierdo-Serra et al.Neuronal photoactivation through second-harmonic near-infrared absorption by gold nanoparticles. Light Sci Appl 7: 100. (2018) doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0103-0

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [114] Cheng J X, Xie X S. Green's function formulation for third-harmonic generation microscopy. J Opt Soc Am B 19, 1604–1610 (2002). doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.19.001604

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [115] Sordillo L A, Pu Y, Pratavieira S, Budansky Y, Alfano R R.Deep optical imaging of tissue using the second and third near-infrared spectral windows. J. Biomed Opt 19, 056004 (2014). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.5.056004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [116] Tsang T Y F. Optical third-harmonic generation at interfaces. Phys Rev A 52, 4116–4125 (1995). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.4116

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [117] Barad Y, Eisenberg H, Horowitz M, Silberberg Y.Nonlinear scanning laser microscopy by third harmonic generation. Appl Phys Lett 70, 922–924 (1997). doi: 10.1063/1.118442

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [118] Yelin D, Silberberg Y. Laser scanning third-harmonic-generation microscopy in biology. Opt Express 5, 169–175 (1999). doi: 10.1364/OE.5.000169

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [119] Débarre D, Supatto W, Pena A M, Fabre A, Tordjmann T et al.Imaging lipid bodies in cells and tissues using third-harmonic generation microscopy. Nat Methods 3, 47–53 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nmeth813

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [120] Chen S Y, Hsieh C S, Chu S W, Lin C Y, Ko C Y et al.Noninvasive harmonics optical microscopy for long-term observation of embryonic nervous system development in vivo. J Biomed Opt 11, 054022 (2006). doi: 10.1117/1.2363369

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [121] Pryke S R, Rollins L A, Griffith S C. Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes. Science 329, 964–967 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1192407

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [122] Chu S W, Chen S Y, Tsai T H, Liu T M, Lin C Y et al.In vivo developmental biology study using noninvasive multi-harmonic generation microscopy. Opt Express 11, 3093–3099 (2003). doi: 10.1364/OE.11.003093

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [123] Yildirim M, Durr N, Ben-Yakar A. Tripling the maximum imaging depth with third-harmonic generation microscopy. J. Biomed Opt 20, 096013 (2015). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.9.096013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [124] Karunendiran A, Cisek R, Tokarz D, Barzda V, Stewart B A.Examination of Drosophila eye development with third harmonic generation microscopy. Biomed Opt Express 8, 4504–4513 (2017). doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.004504

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [125] Tai S P, Lee W J, Shieh D B, Wu P C, Huang H Y et al. In vivo optical biopsy of hamster oral cavity with epi-third-harmonic-generation microscopy. Opt Express 14, 6178–6187 (2006). doi: 10.1364/OE.14.006178

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [126] Tsai M R, Chen S Y, Shieh D B, Lou P J, Sun C K. In vivo optical virtual biopsy of human oral mucosa with harmonic generation microscopy. Biomed Opt Express 2, 2317–2328 (2011). doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.002317

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [127] Lee W J, Lee C F, Chen S Y, Chen Y S, Sun C K.Virtual biopsy of rat tympanic membrane using higher harmonic generation microscopy. J. Biomed Opt 15, 046012 (2010). doi: 10.1117/1.3469848

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [128] Genthial R, Beaurepaire E, Schanne-Klein M C, Peyrin F, Farlay D et al.Label-free imaging of bone multiscale porosity and interfaces using third-harmonic generation microscopy. Sci Rep 7, 3419 (2017). doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03548-5

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [129] Tokarz D, Cisek R, Wein M N, Turcotte R, Haase C et al.Intravital imaging of osteocytes in mouse calvaria using third harmonic generation microscopy. PLoS One 12, e0186846 (2017). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186846

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [130] Tsai C K, Wang T D, Lin J W, Hsu R B, Guo L Z et al.Virtual optical biopsy of human adipocytes with third harmonic generation microscopy. Biomed Opt Express 4, 178–186 (2013). doi: 10.1364/BOE.4.000178

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [131] Weigelin B, Bakker G J, Friedl P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion: Principles of interface guidance and microvesicle dynamics. IntraVital 1, 32–43 (2012). doi: 10.4161/intv.21223

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [132] Lee G G, Lin H H, Tsai M R, Chou S Y, Lee W J et al.Automatic cell segmentation and nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio analysis for third harmonic generated microscopy medical images. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 7, 158–168 (2013). doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2013.2253463

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [133] Lee J H, Chen S Y, Yu C H, Chu S W, Wang L F et al.Noninvasive in vitro and in vivo assessment of epidermal hyperkeratosis and dermal fibrosis in atopic dermatitis. J Biomed Opt 14, 014008 (2009). doi: 10.1117/1.3077182

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [134] Tai S P, Tsai T H, Lee W J, Shieh D B, Liao Y H et al.Optical biopsy of fixed human skin with backward-collected optical harmonics signals. Opt Express 13, 8231–8242 (2005). doi: 10.1364/OPEX.13.008231

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [135] Tsai M R, Cheng Y H, Chen J S, Sheen Y S, Liao Y H et al.Differential diagnosis of nonmelanoma pigmented skin lesions based on harmonic generation microscopy. J Biomed Opt 19, 036001 (2014). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.3.036001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [136] Wu P C, Hsieh T Y, Tsai Z U, Liu T M. In vivo quantification of the structural changes of collagens in a melanoma microenvironment with second and third harmonic generation microscopy. Sci Rep 5, 8879 (2015). doi: 10.1038/srep08879

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [137] Adur J, Pelegati V B, De Thomaz A A, Baratti M O, Almeida D B et al.Optical biomarkers of serous and mucinous human ovarian tumor assessed with nonlinear optics microscopies. PLoS One 7, e47007 (2012). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047007

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [138] Kuzmin N V, Wesseling P, de Witt Hamer P C, Noske D P, Galgano G D et al.Third harmonic generation imaging for fast, label-free pathology of human brain tumors. Biomed Opt Express 7, 1889–1904 (2016). doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.001889

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [139] Lim H, Sharoukhov D, Kassim I, Zhang Y Q, Salzer J L et al.Label-free imaging of Schwann cell myelination by third harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA111, 18025–18030 (2014). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417820111

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [140] Witte S, Negrean A, Lodder J C, de Kock C P J, Silva G T et al.Label-free live brain imaging and targeted patching with third-harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA108, 5970–5975 (2011). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018743108

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [141] Lanin A A, Chebotarev A S, Pochechuev M S, Kelmanson I V, Fedotov A B et al. Three-photon-resonance-enhanced third-harmonic generation for label-free deep-brain imaging: In search of a chemical contrast. J Raman Spectrosc 50, 1296–1302 (2019). doi: 10.1002/jrs.5566

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [142] Kazarine A, Baakdah F, Gopal A A, Oyibo W, Georges E et al.Malaria detection by third-harmonic generation image scanning cytometry. Anal Chem 91, 2216–2223 (2019). doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04791

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [143] van Huizen L M G, Kuzmin N V, Barbé E, van der Velde S, te Velde E A et al.Second and third harmonic generation microscopy visualizes key structural components in fresh unprocessed healthy human breast tissue. J Biophoton 12, e201800297 (2019).

    Google Scholar

    [144] Yelin D, Oron D, Thiberge S, Moses E, Silberberg Y.Multiphoton plasmon-resonance microscopy. Opt Express 11, 1385–1391 (2003). doi: 10.1364/OE.11.001385

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [145] Lippitz M, van Dijk M A, Orrit M. Third-harmonic generation from single gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett 5, 799–802 (2005). doi: 10.1021/nl0502571

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [146] Schwartz O, Oron D. Background-free third harmonic imaging of gold nanorods. Nano Lett 9, 4093–4097 (2009). doi: 10.1021/nl902305w

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [147] Liu T M, Tai S P, Yu C H, Wen Y C, Chu S W et al.Measuring plasmon-resonance enhanced third-harmonic χ(3) of Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett 89, 043122 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2240738

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [148] Tai S P, Wu Y, Shieh D B, Chen L J, Lin K J et al.Molecular imaging of cancer cells using plasmon-resonant-enhanced third-harmonic-generation in silver nanoparticles. Adv Mat 19, 4520–4523 (2007). doi: 10.1002/adma.200602213

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [149] Jung Y, Tong L, Tanaudommongkon A, Cheng J X, Yang C et al.In vitro and in vivo nonlinear optical imaging of silicon nanowires. Nano Lett 9, 2440–2444 (2009). doi: 10.1021/nl901143p

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [150] Chang C F, Chen H C, Chen M J, Liu W R, Hsieh W F et al.Direct backward third-harmonic generation in nanostructures. Opt Express 18, 7397–7406 (2010). doi: 10.1364/OE.18.007397

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [151] Chen N, He Y, Su Y Y, Li X M, Huang Q et al.The cytotoxicity of cadmium-based quantum dots. Biomaterials 33, 1238–1244 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.070

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [152] Dubreil L, Leroux I, Ledevin M, Schleder C, Lagalice L et al. Multi-harmonic imaging in the second near-infrared window of nanoparticle-labeled stem cells as a monitoring tool in tissue depth. ACS Nano 11, 6672–6681 (2017). doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00773

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [153] Lee C W, Wu P C, Hsu I L, Liu T M, Chong W H et al.New templated ostwald ripening process of mesostructured FeOOH for third-harmonic generation bioimaging. Small 15, 1805086 (2019). doi: 10.1002/smll.201805086

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [154] Terhune R W, Maker P D, Savage C M. Measurements of nonlinear light scattering. Phys Rev Lett 14, 681–684 (1965). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.681

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [155] Begley R F, Harvey A B, Byer R L. Coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett 25, 387–390 (1974). doi: 10.1063/1.1655519

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [156] Zumbusch A, Holtom G R, Xie X S. Three-dimensional vibrational imaging by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Phys Rev Lett 82, 4142–4145 (1999). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4142

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [157] Cheng J X, Jia Y K, Zheng G F, Xie X S.Laser-scanning coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy and applications to cell biology. Biophys J 83, 502–509 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75186-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [158] Volkmer A, Cheng J X, Xie X S. Vibrational imaging with high sensitivity via epidetected coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 87, 023901 (2001). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.023901

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [159] Cheng J X, Volkmer A, Book L D, Xie X S.Multiplex coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microspectroscopy and study of lipid vesicles. J Phys Chem B 106, 8493–8498 (2002). doi: 10.1021/jp025771z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [160] Müller M, Schins J M. Imaging the thermodynamic state of lipid membranes with multiplex CARS microscopy. J Phys Chem B 106, 3715–3723 (2002). doi: 10.1021/jp014012y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [161] Nan X L, Yang W Y, Xie X S. CARS microscopy lights up lipids in living cells. Biophoton Int 11, 44–47 (2004).

    Google Scholar

    [162] Rakic B, Sagan S M, Noestheden M, Bélanger S, Nan X L et al.Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor α antagonism inhibits hepatitis C virus replication. Chem Biol 13, 23–30 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.10.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [163] Nan X L, Tonary A M, Stolow A, Xie X S, Pezacki J P et al.Intracellular imaging of HCV RNA and cellular lipids by using simultaneous two-photon fluorescence and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopies. Chem Bio Chem 7, 1895–1897 (2006). doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600330

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [164] Hellerer T, Axäng C, Brackmann C, Hillertz P, Pilon M et al. Monitoring of lipid storage in Caenorhabditis elegans using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 14658–14663 (2007). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703594104

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [165] Xie X S, Yu J, Yang W Y. Living cells as test tubes. Science 312, 228–230 (2006). doi: 10.1126/science.1127566

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [166] Yen K, Le T T, Bansal A, Narasimhan S D, Cheng J X et al.A comparative study of fat storage quantitation in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using label and label-free methods. PLoS One 5, e12810 (2010). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012810

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [167] Nan X L, Potma E O, Xie X S. Nonperturbative chemical imaging of organelle transport in living cells with coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Biophys J 91, 728–735 (2006). doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.074534

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [168] Lyn R K, Kennedy D C, Stolow A, Ridsdale A, Pezacki J P et al.Dynamics of lipid droplets induced by the hepatitis C virus core protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 399, 518–524 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.101

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [169] Paar M, Jüngst C, Steiner N A, Magnes C, Sinner F et al.Remodeling of lipid droplets during lipolysis and growth in adipocytes. J Biol Chem 287, 11164–11173 (2012). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.316794

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [170] Evans C L, Potma E O, Puoris'haag M, Côté D, Lin C P et al.Chemical imaging of tissue in vivo with video-rate coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 16807–16812 (2005). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508282102

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [171] Breunig H G, Weinigel M, Bückle R, Kellner-Höfer M, Lademann J et al. Clinical coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering and multiphoton tomography of human skin with a femtosecond laser and photonic crystal fiber. Laser Phys Lett 10, 025604 (2013). doi: 10.1088/1612-2011/10/2/025604

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [172] Evans C L, Xie X S. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman Scattering microscopy: chemical imaging for biology and medicine. Annu Rev Anal Chem 1, 883–909 (2008). doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112754

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [173] Toytman I, Cohn K, Smith T, Simanovskii D, Palanker D.Wide-field coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy with non-phase-matching illumination. Opt Lett 32, 1941–1943 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OL.32.001941

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [174] Brackmann C, Esguerra M, Olausson D, Delbro D, Krettek A et al.Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy of human smooth muscle cells in bioengineered tissue scaffolds. J Biomed Opt 16, 021115 (2011). doi: 10.1117/1.3534782

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [175] Wang H W, Le T T, Cheng J X. Label-free imaging of arterial cells and extracellular matrix using a multimodal CARS microscope. Opt Comm 281, 1813–1822 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.07.067

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [176] Wang H F, Fu Y, Zickmund P, Shi R, Cheng J X.Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering imaging of axonal myelin in live spinal tissues. Biophys J 89, 581–591 (2005). doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.061911

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [177] Huff T B, Cheng J X. In vivo coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging of sciatic nerve tissue. J Microsc 225, 175–182 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01729.x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [178] Fu Y, Wang H F, Huff T B, Shi R, Cheng J X. Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering imaging of myelin degradation reveals a calcium-dependent pathway in lyso-PtdCho-induced demyelination. J Neurosci Res 85, 2870–2881 (2007). doi: 10.1002/jnr.21403

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [179] Yookyung J, Ng J H, Keating C P, Senthil-Kumar P, Zhao J et al.Comprehensive evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration in the acute healing phase using tissue clearing and optical microscopy in a rodent model. PLoS One 9, e94054 (2014). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094054

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [180] Evans C L, Xu X Y, Kesari S, Xie X S, Wong S T C et al.Chemically-selective imaging of brain structures with CARS microscopy. Opt Express 15, 12076–12087 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OE.15.012076

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [181] Légaré F, Evans C L, Ganikhanov, Xie X S.Towards CARS endoscopy. Optics Express 14, 4427–4432 (2006). doi: 10.1364/OE.14.004427

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [182] Camp Jr C H, Lee Y J, Heddleston J M, Hartshorn C M, Walker A R H et al.High-speed coherent Raman fingerprint imaging of biological tissues. Nat Photon 8, 627–634(2014). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.145

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [183] Bocklitz T W, Salah F S, Vogler N, Heuke S, Chernavskaia O et al.Pseudo-HE images derived from CARS/TPEF/SHG multimodal imaging in combination with Raman-spectroscopy as a pathological screening tool. BMC Cancer 16, 534 (2016). doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2520-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [184] Petersen D, Mavarani L, Niedieker D, Freier E, Tannapfel A et al.Virtual staining of colon cancer tissue by label-free Raman micro-spectroscopy. Analyst 142, 1207–1215 (2017). doi: 10.1039/C6AN02072K

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [185] Galli R, Uckermann O, Temme A, Leipnitz E, Meinhardt M et al. Assessing the efficacy of coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy for the detection of infiltrating glioblastoma in fresh brain samples. J Biophoton 10, 404–414 (2017). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500323

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [186] Karuna A, Masia F, Wiltshire M, Errington R, Langbein W.Label-free volumetric quantitative imaging of the human somatic cell division by hyperspectral coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Anal Chem 91, 2813–2821 (2019). doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04706

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [187] Niedieker D, Grosserüschkamp F, Schreiner A, Barkovits K, Kötting C et al.Label-free identification of myopathological features with coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Muscle Nerve 58, 456–459 (2018). doi: 10.1002/mus.26140

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [188] Hirose K, Fukushima S, Fukushima T, Niioka H, Hashimoto M.Invited Article: Label-free nerve imaging with a coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering rigid endoscope using two optical fibers for laser delivery. APL Photon 3, 092407 (2018). doi: 10.1063/1.5031817

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [189] Kang E, Wang H F, Kwon I K, Robinson J, Cheng J X.In situ visualization of paclitaxel distribution and release by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Anal Chem 78, 8036–8043 (2006). doi: 10.1021/ac061218s

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [190] Hartshorn C M, Lee Y J, Camp Jr C H, Liu Z, Heddleston J et al.Multicomponent chemical imaging of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms with broadband CARS microscopy. Anal Chem 85, 8102–8111 (2013). doi: 10.1021/ac400671p

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [191] Fussell A L, Grasmeijer F, Frijlink H W, de Boer A H, Offerhaus H L. CARS microscopy as a tool for studying the distribution of micronised drugs in adhesive mixtures for inhalation. J Raman Spectrosc 45, 495–500 (2014). doi: 10.1002/jrs.4515

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [192] Tong L, Lu Y H, Lee R J, Cheng J X.Imaging receptor-mediated endocytosis with a polymeric nanoparticle-based coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering probe. J Phys Chem B 111, 9980–9985 (2007). doi: 10.1021/jp073478z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [193] Xu P S, Gullotti E, Tong L, Highley C B, Errabelli D R et al.Intracellular drug delivery by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles, revisited. Mol Pharm 6, 190–201 (2009). doi: 10.1021/mp800137z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [194] Garrett N L, Lalatsa A, Begley D, Mihoreanu L, Uchegbu I F et al.Label-free imaging of polymeric nanomedicines using coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 43, 681–688 (2012). doi: 10.1002/jrs.3170

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [195] Darville N, Saarinen J, Isomäki A, Khriachtchev L, Cleeren D et al. Multimodal non-linear optical imaging for the investigation of drug nano-/microcrystal–cell interactions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 96, 338–348 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.09.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [196] Freudiger C W, Min W, Saar B G, Lu S J, Holtom G R et al.Label-free biomedical imaging with high sensitivity by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Science 322, 1857–1861 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1165758

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [197] Ozeki Y, Dake F, Kajiyama S, Fukui K, Itoh K. Analysis and experimental assessment of the sensitivity of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Opt Express 17, 3651–3658 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OE.17.003651

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [198] Nandakumar P, Kovalev A, Volkmer A.Vibrational imaging based on stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. New J Phys 11, 033026 (2009). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [199] Zhang D L, Slipchenko M N, Cheng J X. Highly sensitive vibrational imaging by femtosecond pulse stimulated Raman loss. J Phys Chem Lett 2, 1248–1253 (2011). doi: 10.1021/jz200516n

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [200] Andresen E R, Berto P, Rigneault H. Stimulated Raman scattering microscopy by spectral focusing and fiber-generated soliton as Stokes pulse. Opt Lett 36, 2387–2389 (2011). doi: 10.1364/OL.36.002387

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [201] Beier H T, Noojin G D, Rockwell B A. Stimulated Raman scattering using a single femtosecond oscillator with flexibility for imaging and spectral applications. Opt Express 19, 18885–18892 (2011). doi: 10.1364/OE.19.018885

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [202] Slipchenko M N, Oglesbee R A, Zhang D L, Wu W, Cheng J X.Heterodyne detected nonlinear optical imaging in a lock-in free manner. J Biophoton 5, 801–807 (2012). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [203] Cheng J X, Xie X S, Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: An emerging platform for biology and medicine. Science 350, aaa8870 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8870

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [204] Woodbury E J, Ng W K. Ruby laser operation in near IR. Proc Inst Radio Eng 50, 2367 (1962).

    Google Scholar

    [205] Owyoung A, Jones E D. Stimulated Raman spectroscopy using low-power cw lasers. Opt Lett 1, 152–154 (1977). doi: 10.1364/OL.1.000152

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [206] Ploetz E, Laimgruber S, Berner S, Zinth W, Gilch P.Femtosecond stimulated Raman microscopy. Appl Phys B 87, 389–393 (2007). doi: 10.1007/s00340-007-2630-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [207] Wang M C, Min W, Freudiger C W, Ruvkun G, Xie X S.RNAi screening for fat regulatory genes with SRS microscopy. Nat Methods 8, 135–138 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1556

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [208] Dou W, Zhang D L, Jung Y, Cheng J X, Umulis D M.Label-free imaging of lipid-droplet intracellular motion in early Drosophila embryos using femtosecond-stimulated Raman loss microscopy. Biophys J 102, 1666–1675 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.01.057

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [209] Wang P, Liu B, Zhang D L, Belew M Y, Tissenbaum H A et al.Imaging lipid metabolism in live Caenorhabditis elegans using fingerprint vibrations. Angew Chem Int Ed 53, 11787–11792 (2014). doi: 10.1002/anie.201406029

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [210] Hu C R, Zhang D L, Slipchenko M N, Cheng J X, Hu B.Label-free real-time imaging of myelination in the Xenopus laevis tadpole by in vivo stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. J Biomed Opt 19, 086005 (2014). doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.8.086005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [211] Freudiger C W, Pfannl R, Orringer D A, Saar B G, Ji M B et al. Multicolored stain-free histopathology with coherent Raman imaging. Lab Invest 92, 1492–1502 (2012). doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2012.109

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [212] Lu F K, Ji M B, Fu D, Ni X H, Freudiger C W et al.Multicolor stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy. Mol Phys 110, 1927–1932 (2012). doi: 10.1080/00268976.2012.695028

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [213] Lu F K, Basu S, Igras V, Hoang M P, Ji M B et al.Label-free DNA imaging in vivo with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 11624–11629 (2015). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515121112

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [214] Yue S H, Li J J, Lee S Y, Lee H J, Shao T et al.Cholesteryl ester accumulation induced by PTEN loss and PI3K/AKT activation underlies human prostate cancer aggressiveness. Cell Metab 19, 393–406 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.01.019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [215] Wang P, Li J J, Wang P, Hu C R, Zhang D L et al.Label-free quantitative imaging of cholesterol in intact tissues by hyperspectral stimulated raman scattering microscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed 52, 13042–13046 (2013). doi: 10.1002/anie.201306234

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [216] Li J J, Condello S, Thomes-Pepin J, Ma X X, Xia Y et al.Lipid desaturation is a metabolic marker and therapeutic target of ovarian cancer stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 20, 303–314. (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [217] Mittal R, Balu M, Krasieva T, Potma E O, Elkeeb L et al.Evaluation of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy for identifying squamous cell carcinoma in human skin. Lasers Surg Med 45, 496–502 (2013).

    Google Scholar

    [218] Ji M B, Orringer D A, Freudiger C W, Ramkissoon S, Liu X H et al.Rapid, label-free detection of brain tumors with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Sci Transl Med 5, 201ra119 (2013).

    Google Scholar

    [219] Jermyn M, Mok K, Mercier J, Desroches J, Pichette J et al.Intraoperative brain cancer detection with Raman spectroscopy in humans. Sci Transl Med 7, 274ra19 (2015). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2384

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [220] Ji M B, Arbel M, Zhang L L, Freudiger C W, Hou S S et al.Label-free imaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Sci Adv 4, eaat7715 (2018). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat7715

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [221] Yan S, Cui S S, Ke K, Zhao B X, Liu X L et al.Hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering microscopy unravels aberrant accumulation of saturated fat in human liver cancer. Anal Chem 90, 6362–6366 (2018). doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01312

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [222] Wei L, Yu Y, Shen Y H, Wang M C, Min W.Vibrational imaging of newly synthesized proteins in live cells by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 11226–11231 (2013). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303768110

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [223] Li J J, Cheng J X. Direct visualization of de novo lipogenesis in single living cells. Sci Rep 4, 6807 (2014).

    Google Scholar

    [224] Shen Y H, Xu F, Wei L, Hu F H, Min W.Live-cell quantitative imaging of proteome degradation by stimulated Raman scattering. Angew Chem Int Ed 53, 5596–5599 (2014). doi: 10.1002/anie.201310725

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [225] Li X S, Li Y, Jiang M J, Wu W J, He S C et al.Quantitative imaging of lipid synthesis and lipolysis dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Anal Chem 91, 2279–2287 (2019). doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04875

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [226] Slipchenko M N, Chen H T, Ely D R, Jung Y, Carvajal M T et al.Vibrational imaging of tablets by epi-detected stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Analyst 135, 2613–2619 (2010). doi: 10.1039/c0an00252f

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [227] Fu D, Zhou J, Zhu W J S, Manley P W, Wang Y K et al.Imaging the intracellular distribution of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in living cells with quantitative hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering. Nat Chem 6, 614–622 (2014). doi: 10.1038/nchem.1961

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [228] Chiu W S, Belsey N A, Garrett N L, Moger J, Delgado-Charro M B et al.Molecular diffusion in the human nail measured by stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 7725–7730 (2015).

    Google Scholar

    [229] Wei L, Min W. Pump-probe optical microscopy for imaging nonfluorescent chromophores. Anal Bioanal Chem 403, 2197–2202 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5890-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [230] Fischer M C, Wilson J W, Robles F E, Warren W S.Invited Review Article: Pump-probe microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 87, 031101 (2016). doi: 10.1063/1.4943211

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [231] Dong P T, Chen J X. Pump-probe microscopy: theory, instrumentation, and application. Spectroscopy 32, 24–36 (2017).

    Google Scholar

    [232] Dong C Y, So P T, French T, Gratton E.Fluorescence lifetime imaging by asynchronous pump-probe microscopy. Biophys J 69, 2234–2242 (1995). doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80148-7

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [233] Fu D, Ye T, Matthews T E, Yurtsever G, Warren Sr W S.Two-color, two-photon, and excited-state absorption microscopy. J Biomed Opt 12, 054004 (2007). doi: 10.1117/1.2780173

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [234] Dan F, Ye T, Matthews T, Chen B J, Yurtserver G et al.High-resolution in vivo imaging of blood vessels without labeling. Opt Lett 32, 2641–2643 (2007). doi: 10.1364/OL.32.002641

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [235] Min W, Lu S J, Chong S S, Roy R, Holtom G R et al.Imaging chromophores with undetectable fluorescence by stimulated emission microscopy. Nature 461, 1105–1109 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nature08438

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [236] Piletic I R, Matthews T E, Warren W S. Probing near-infrared photorelaxation pathways in eumelanins and pheomelanins. J Phys Chem A 114, 11483–11491 (2010). doi: 10.1021/jp103608d

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [237] Matthews T E, Wilson J W, Degan S, Simpson M J, Jin J Y et al. In vivo and ex vivo epi-mode pump-probe imaging of melanin and microvasculature. Biomed Opt Express 2, 1576–1583 (2011). doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.001576

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [238] Robles F E, Deb S, Wilson J W, Gainey C S, Selim M A et al.Pump-probe imaging of pigmented cutaneous melanoma primary lesions gives insight into metastatic potential. Biomed Opt Express6, 3631–3645 (2015). doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.003631

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [239] Chen A J, Yuan X J, Li J J, Dong P T, Hamza I et al.Label-free imaging of heme dynamics in living organisms by transient absorption microscopy. Anal Chem 90, 3395–3401 (2018). doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05046

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [240] Dong P T, Lin H N, Huang K C, Cheng J X.Label-free quantitation of glycated hemoglobin in single red blood cells by transient absorption microscopy and phasor analysis. Sci Adv 5, eaav0561 (2019). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav0561

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [241] Tong L, Liu Y X, Dolash B D, Jung Y, Slipchenko M N et al. Label-free imaging of semiconducting and metallic carbon nanotubes in cells and mice using transient absorption microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 7, 56–61 (2012).

    Google Scholar

    [242] Chen T, Lu F, Streets A M, Fei P, Quan J M et al. Optical imaging of non-fluorescent nanodiamonds in live cells using transient absorption microscopy. Nanoscale 5, 4701–4705 (2013). doi: 10.1039/c3nr00308f

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [243] Chen T, Chen S H, Zhou J H, Liang D H, Chen X Y et al. Transient absorption microscopy of gold nanorods as spectrally orthogonal labels in live cells. Nanoscale 6, 10536–10539 (2014). doi: 10.1039/C4NR03413A

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [244] Li J J, Zhang W X, Chung T F, Slipchenko M N et al. Highly sensitive transient absorption imaging of graphene and graphene oxide in living cells and circulating blood. Sci Rep 5, 12394 (2015). doi: 10.1038/srep12394

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [245] Liao C S, Slipchenko M N, Wang P, Li J J, Lee S Y et al. Microsecond scale vibrational spectroscopic imaging by multiplex stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Light Sci Appl 4, e265 (2015). doi: 10.1038/lsa.2015.38

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Related articles

    Mingbo Pu, Xiangang Luo
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2023, 6(8)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.230153
    Zeev Zalevsky
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2025, 8(3)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2025.250026
    Yongjae Jo, Hyemi Park, Hyeyoung Yoon, Inki Kim
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(12)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240122
    Yutao Tang, Zixian Hu, Junhong Deng, Kingfai Li, Guixin Li
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(12)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240138
    Tingzhu Wu, Shouqiang Lai, Zhong Chen, Hao-Chung Kuo
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2023, 6(9)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.230154
    Junkyeong Park, Gyeongtae Kim, Junsuk Rho
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2025, 8(1)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2025.240267
    Ji Tong Wang, Pavel Tonkaev, Kirill Koshelev, Fangxing Lai, Sergey Kruk, Qinghai Song, Yuri Kivshar, Nicolae C. Panoiu
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2024, 7(5)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.230186
    Chunyan Chu, Zhentao Liu, Mingliang Chen, Xuehui Shao, Guohai Situ, Yuejin Zhao, Shensheng Han
    Opto-Electronic Advances    2023, 6(12)   doi: 10.29026/oea.2023.230017
  • 1.  Alkhatib, M.B.M.M., Hussein, M.T.H.A., Alfantech, M.A. et al. Spectroscopic and nonlinear optical investigations of biscinnamyl-sulfone derivatives: Computational and experimental insights. Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2025.
    2.  Eunice, E., Prasana, J.C., Kadaikunnan, S. et al. Quantum mechanical, spectroscopic, docking studies (Dementia & breast cancer) and in-vitro assays of phytochemical compound Dehydrozingerone by DFT. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2025.
    3.  Zheng, Z., Smirnova, D., Sanderson, G. et al. Broadband infrared imaging governed by guided-mode resonance in dielectric metasurfaces. Light: Science and Applications, 2024, 13(1): 249.
    4.  Bera, K., Rojas-Gómez, R.A., Mukherjee, P. et al. Probing delivery of a lipid nanoparticle encapsulated self-amplifying mRNA vaccine using coherent Raman microscopy and multiphoton imaging. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 4348.
    5.  Tabi, C.B., Tiam Megne, L., Muiva, C. et al. Stability of few-cycle light bullets in nonlinear metamaterials beyond the slowly varying envelope approximation. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, 2024.
    6.  Arraoui, R., Jaouane, M., Ed-Dahmouny, A. et al. Influence of structural factors and impurity position on second harmonic generation in double-quantum box GaAs-Ga1-xAlxAs structures. European Physical Journal Plus, 2024, 139(9): 830.
    7.  Abrinaei, F., Fakharpour, M. Improvement in optical nonlinearity of spiral square Mn-based nanostructures with increasing the number of square sides. Optik, 2024.
    8.  Sohaib, M., Maqbool, M., Sajid, H. et al. Superalkalides based on stacked janus molecule with improved optical nonlinearity. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2024.
    9.  Jahromi, S.I., Słowik, K. Multiphoton absorption enhancement by graphene–gold nanostructure. Optics Letters, 2024, 49(14): 3914-3917.
    10.  Schulz, S.A., Oulton, R.F., Kenney, M. et al. Roadmap on photonic metasurfaces. Applied Physics Letters, 2024, 124(26): 260701.
    11.  Yuvashri, R., Reuben Jonathan, D., Anish Fathima, A. et al. Synthesis, structural, spectral, thermal, and optical characterization of a new curcumin derivative: A promising material for NLO applications. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2024.
    12.  Wang, X., Liu, L., Liu, J. et al. Optical measurement for the alarming height of silver paste overflow surrounding APD chip in optical component packaging. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024.
    13.  Antoine, R.. Luminescent nanoclusters for applications in biomedical field. Nanostructured Materials for Biomedical Applications, 2024.
    14.  Ao, J., Ji, M. Stimulated Raman histology. Transpathology: Molecular Imaging-Based Pathology, 2024.
    15.  Zhu, Y., Su, J., Pan, H. et al. Recent advances in preparation and application of MXenes-based nanodots. Chemical Industry and Engineering, 2024, 41(3): 26-34.
    16.  Zhong, Q., Wu, F.O., Hassan, A.U. et al. Universality of light thermalization in multimoded nonlinear optical systems. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 370.
    17.  Olumba, M.E., O’Donnell, R.M., Rohrabaugh, T.N. et al. Triplet-Triplet Energy Transfer in Bis-Cyclometalated Iridium Complexes with Pyrene-Substituted Isocyanides. Inorganic Chemistry, 2023, 62(34): 13702-13711.
    18.  Huang, J., Cui, Y., Liang, D. et al. Differential confocal measurement of microstructure surface topography based on centering error optimization and wavelet threshold denoising. Optics and Laser Technology, 2023.
    19.  Hemmatian, M.A., Jahangiri, F. A simplified model for predicting the nonlinear properties of water and centrosymmetric media at terahertz frequencies. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 2023, 55(4): 359.
    20.  Bhuiyan, M.R.A., Mamur, H., Dilmaç, Ö.F. Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Advances in Organic Synthesis, 2023.
    21.  Li, Y., Fan, J., Jiang, T. et al. Review of the development of optical coherence tomography imaging navigation technology in ophthalmic surgery | [光学相干层析技术在眼科手术导航方面的研究进展]. Guangdian Gongcheng/Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2023, 50(1): 220027.
    22.  Isnaeni, Sugiarto, I.T., Tresna, W.P. Two-photon emission of fluorescent carbon quantum dots made of urea and trisodium citrate. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022.
    23.  Wang, X., Liu, L., Ye, Y. et al. Micro vision-based measurement of concentricity for both TO base and active area of a APD chip in optical component packaging. Optics Express, 2022, 30(21): 38468-38480.
    24.  Li, Z., Kong, W., Wang, C. et al. Multi-Wavelength Super-Resolution Imaging by Structured Illumination of Bloch Surface Waves. IEEE Photonics Journal, 2022, 14(4): 4638407.
    25.  Sugita, A., Mochiduki, K., Katahira, Y. et al. Augmentation of surface plasmon-enhanced second harmonic generation from Au nanoprisms on SiO2/Si: interference contribution. Optics Express, 2022, 30(12): 22161-22177.
    26.  Nikolaeva, A., Mastalieva, V., Gudovskikh, A.S. et al. Large-scale flexible membrane with resonant silicon nanowires for infrared visualization via efficient third harmonic generation. Applied Physics Letters, 2022, 120(15): 151102.
    27.  Hao, R., Wang, X., Zhang, J. et al. An automatic object detection method for microscopic images based on attention mechanism | [采用注意力机制的显微图像智能检测方法]. Guangdian Gongcheng/Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2022, 49(3): 210361.
    28.  Xu, L., Smirnova, D.A., Camacho-Morales, R. et al. Enhanced four-wave mixing from multi-resonant silicon dimer-hole membrane metasurfaces. New Journal of Physics, 2022, 24(3): 035002.
    29.  Guo, L., Hunag, W., Zheng, W. et al. Indirect quantitative analysis of soluble solid content in citrus by the leaves using hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning. Applied Optics, 2022, 61(2): 491-497.
    30.  Chen, L., Hong, M. Functional nonlinear optical nanoparticles synthesized by laser ablation. Opto-Electronic Science, 2022, 1(5)
    31.  Ren, J., Lin, H., Zheng, X. et al. Giant and light modifiable third-order optical nonlinearity in a free-standing h-BN film. Opto-Electronic Science, 2022, 1(6)
    32.  Wang, Y., Ma, G., Gao, G. et al. Bioimaging of Dissolvable Microneedle Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities. Research, 2022.
    33.  Wang, X., Yu, H., Yang, T. et al. Density Regulation and Localization of Cell Clusters by Self-Assembled Femtosecond-Laser-Fabricated Micropillar Arrays. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, 2021, 13(49): 58261-58269.
    34.  Ren, S., Chen, Z., Li, S. et al. Resonance-enhanced second harmonic generation via quantum dots integrated with Ag nanoarrays. Optical Materials Express, 2021, 11(9): 3223-3231.
    35.  Bhuiyan, M.R.A., Mamur, H. A brief review on the synthesis of zno nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Iranian Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(3)
    36.  Luo, Z., Xu, H., Liu, L. et al. Optical imaging of beta-amyloid plaques in alzheimer’s disease. Biosensors, 2021, 11(8): 255.
    37.  Beliaev, L.Yu., Takayama, O., Melentiev, P.N. et al. Photoluminescence control by hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces: A review. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4(8): 210031.
    38.  Sharbirin, A.S., Akhtar, S., Kim, J.Y. Light-emitting mxene quantum dots. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4(3): 200077.

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsPDF Downloads2024-032024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-020255075100125Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 78.9 %FULLTEXT: 78.9 %PDF: 21.1 %PDF: 21.1 %FULLTEXTPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area DistributionOthers: 37.4 %Others: 37.4 %United States: 32.5 %United States: 32.5 %India: 7.5 %India: 7.5 %Russia: 6.6 %Russia: 6.6 %France: 4.1 %France: 4.1 %Japan: 1.4 %Japan: 1.4 %Germany: 1.1 %Germany: 1.1 %Brazil: 0.7 %Brazil: 0.7 %Singapore: 0.6 %Singapore: 0.6 %Portugal: 0.6 %Portugal: 0.6 %United Kingdom: 0.6 %United Kingdom: 0.6 %Turkey: 0.6 %Turkey: 0.6 %Italy: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %Poland: 0.4 %Poland: 0.4 %Pakistan: 0.4 %Pakistan: 0.4 %Denmark: 0.3 %Denmark: 0.3 %Indonesia: 0.3 %Indonesia: 0.3 %Malaysia: 0.2 %Malaysia: 0.2 %Finland: 0.2 %Finland: 0.2 %Lithuania: 0.2 %Lithuania: 0.2 %Belgium: 0.2 %Belgium: 0.2 %Switzerland: 0.2 %Switzerland: 0.2 %Egypt: 0.2 %Egypt: 0.2 %Saudi Arabia: 0.2 %Saudi Arabia: 0.2 %Republic of Korea: 0.2 %Republic of Korea: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Israel: 0.2 %Israel: 0.2 %Austria: 0.1 %Austria: 0.1 %Philippines: 0.1 %Philippines: 0.1 %Mexico: 0.1 %Mexico: 0.1 %Australia: 0.1 %Australia: 0.1 %Spain: 0.1 %Spain: 0.1 %Bangladesh: 0.1 %Bangladesh: 0.1 %Sweden: 0.1 %Sweden: 0.1 %Qatar: 0.1 %Qatar: 0.1 %Benin: 0.1 %Benin: 0.1 %Morocco: 0.1 %Morocco: 0.1 %Argentina: 0.1 %Argentina: 0.1 %Azerbaijan: 0.1 %Azerbaijan: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %Norway: 0.1 %Chile: 0.1 %Chile: 0.1 %Cameroon: 0.0 %Cameroon: 0.0 %Kazakhstan: 0.0 %Kazakhstan: 0.0 %Syria: 0.0 %Syria: 0.0 %Latvia: 0.0 %Latvia: 0.0 %Slovenia: 0.0 %Slovenia: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Ethiopia: 0.0 %Ethiopia: 0.0 %Thailand: 0.0 %Thailand: 0.0 %Sri Lanka: 0.0 %Sri Lanka: 0.0 %Lebanon: 0.0 %Lebanon: 0.0 %Venezuela: 0.0 %Venezuela: 0.0 %Czech Republic: 0.0 %Czech Republic: 0.0 %Nigeria: 0.0 %Nigeria: 0.0 %OthersUnited StatesIndiaRussiaFranceJapanGermanyBrazilSingaporePortugalUnited KingdomTurkeyItalyCanadaPolandPakistanDenmarkIndonesiaMalaysiaFinlandLithuaniaBelgiumSwitzerlandEgyptSaudi ArabiaRepublic of KoreaNetherlandsIsraelAustriaPhilippinesMexicoAustraliaSpainBangladeshSwedenQatarBeninMoroccoArgentinaAzerbaijanNorwayChileCameroonKazakhstanSyriaLatviaSloveniaSeychellesEthiopiaThailandSri LankaLebanonVenezuelaCzech RepublicNigeriaHighcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(9)

Article Metrics

Article views(14100) PDF downloads(3225) Cited by(40)

Access History

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint