Citation: | Min Lei, Yang Ping, Xu Bing, et al. Multi-image blind super-resolution in variational Bayesian framework[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2019, 46(6): 180149. doi: 10.12086/oee.2019.180149 |
[1] | 郭迎辉, 蒲明博, 马晓亮, 等.电磁超构材料色散调控研究进展[J].光电工程, 2017, 44(1): 3-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2017.01.001 Guo Y H, Pu M B, Ma X L, et al. Advances of dispersion-engineered metamaterials[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2017, 44(1): 3-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2017.01.001 |
[2] | Dong C, Loy C C, He K M, et al. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 38(2): 295-307. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2439281 |
[3] | Ledig C, Theis L, Huszár F, et al. Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network[C]//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, 2017: 105-114. |
[4] | 汪荣贵, 汪庆辉, 杨娟, 等.融合特征分类和独立字典训练的超分辨率重建[J].光电工程, 2018, 45(1): 170542. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.170542 Wang R G, Wang Q H, Yang J, et al. Image super-resolution reconstruction by fusing feature classification and independent dictionary training[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2018, 45(1): 170542. doi: 10.12086/oee.2018.170542 |
[5] | Nasrollahi K, Moeslund T B. Super-resolution: a comprehensive survey[J]. Machine Vision and Applications, 2014, 25(6): 1423-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00138-014-0623-4 |
[6] | Yue L W, Shen H F, Li J, et al. Image super-resolution: the techniques, applications, and future[J]. Signal Processing, 2016, 128: 389-408. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.002 |
[7] | Tsai R Y, Huang T S. Multi-frame image restoration and registration[M]//Huang T S. Advances in Computer Vision and Image Processing. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1984: 317-339. |
[8] | Shen H F, Peng L, Yue L W, et al. Adaptive norm selection for regularized image restoration and super-resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2016, 46(6): 1388-1399. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2446755 |
[9] | Zeng X Y, Yang L H. A robust multiframe super-resolution algorithm based on half-quadratic estimation with modified BTV regularization[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2013, 23(1): 98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.06.013 |
[10] | Huang S Y, Sun J, Yang Y, et al. Multi-frame super-resolution reconstruction based on gradient vector flow hybrid field[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 21669-21683. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2757239 |
[11] | Molina R, Vega M, Abad J, et al. Parameter estimation in Bayesian high-resolution image reconstruction with multisensors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2003, 12(12): 1655-1667. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.818117 |
[12] | Babacan S D, Molina R, Katsaggelos A K. Variational Bayesian super resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(4): 984-999. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2080278 |
[13] | Villena S, Vega M, Molina R, et al. A non-stationary image prior combination in super-resolution[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2014, 32: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2014.05.017 |
[14] | Liu C, Sun D Q. On Bayesian adaptive video super resolution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014, 36(2): 346-360. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.127 |
[15] | Ng M K, Shen H F, Lam E Y, et al. A total variation regularization based super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for digital video[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2007, 2007: 074585. doi: 10.1155/2007/74585 |
[16] | Beal M J. Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference[D]. London, UK: University College London, 2003. |
[17] | Bioucas-Dias J M, Figueiredo M A T, Oliveira J P. Total variation-based image deconvolution: a majorization-minimization approach[C]//Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings, Toulouse, 2006: 861-864. |
[18] | Dong C, Loy C C, He K M, et al. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks[EB/OL]. http://mmlab.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/projects/SRCNN.html. |
[19] | Lucas B, Kanade T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, 1981: 674-679. |
[20] | Wang Z, Bovik A C. Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2009, 26(1): 98-117. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.930649 |
[21] | Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861 |
Overview: Images with high spatial resolution are usually desirable in real applications. The most direct approaches to increase the spatial resolution are: 1) increasing the bandwidth of the optics; 2) increasing the sampling frequency of the image sensor. However, these hardware-based approaches usually increase the volume or cost of the imaging system. Different from the hardware-based approaches, we use digital signal processing algorithm to increase the spatial resolution by a set of low-resolution (LR) images of the same scene. This approach is termed as multi-frame image super-resolution (SR). Variational Bayesian framework has been used to derive the SR algorithms for its model flexibility and parameter adaptivity. For multi-frame image SR, the accurate estimation of blur kernel of LR image is prerequisite for high-efficiency SR reconstruction. However, in variational Bayesian SR framework, all the methods assume a known and fixed blur kernel for LR images. We propose a blind SR method containing blur kernel self-adaptive estimation. First, the desired high-resolution (HR) image and the blur kernel are modeled in the imaging degradation model. Next, the total variation model is used to model the HR image and the blur kernel, and the Gamma distribution is used to model the corresponding parameters. Finally, the variational Bayesian inference based on Kullback-Leibler divergence and majorization-minimization approach is utilized to derive the SR algorithm. For the proposed method, the HR image, the blur kernel and the model parameters are estimated simultaneously and automatically. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-art methods. For the experiments on simulated data, the performance of the resolution enhancement method is quantitatively measured by the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity measure (SSIM). For typical ground truth HR image and blur kernel setup, the proposed method has the highest PSNR and SSIM and improves the PSNR by at least 1 dB~5 dB. For the visual effect, the proposed method has better blur removing performance. For the real data experiments using resolution chart LR images, the proposed method has better performance in preserving image details, suppressing noise and removing artifacts. The comparison experiments demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method. Especially, for the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) scenarios, the accuracy of blur kernel estimation dominates the performance and the proposed method can improve the performance dramatically. By the visual effect, the proposed method has better trade-off in preserving image details and removing noise and artifacts.
The ground truth high-resolution image for simulated experiment data. (a) Lena; (b) EIA
The enhancement result on EIA for 35 dB and blur kernel case 1. (a) First LR image; (b) BBC; (c) SRCNN; (d) SAR; (e) TV; (f) NS; (g) Proposed
The enhancement result on Lena for 35 dB and blur kernel case 2. (a) First LR image; (b) BBC; (c) SRCNN; (d) SAR; (e) TV; (f) NS; (g) Proposed
The enhancement result on resolution chart image. (a) First LR image; (b) BBC; (c) SRCNN; (d) SAR; (e) TV; (f) NS; (g) Proposed