Citation: | Liu SQ, Chen SZ, Wen SC, Luo HL. Photonic spin Hall effect: fundamentals and emergent applications. Opto-Electron Sci 1, 220007 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oes.2022.220007 |
[1] | Onoda M, Murakami S, Nagaosa N. Hall effect of light. Phys Rev Lett 93, 083901 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.083901 |
[2] | Bliokh KY, Bliokh YP. Conservation of angular momentum, transverse shift, and spin Hall effect in reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave packet. Phys Rev Lett 96, 073903 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.073903 |
[3] | Hall EH. On a new action of the magnet on electric currents. Am J Math 2, 287–292 (1879). doi: 10.2307/2369245 |
[4] | Haldane FDM. Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”. Phys Rev Lett 61, 2015–2018 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015 |
[5] | Klitzing KV, Dorda G, Pepper M. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance. Phys Rev Lett 45, 494–497 (1980). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.494 |
[6] | Tsui DC, Stormer HL, Gossard AC. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys Rev Lett 48, 1559–1562 (1982). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559 |
[7] | Tsui DC, Stormer HL. The fractional quantum Hall effect. IEEE J Quantum Electron 22, 1711–1719 (1986). doi: 10.1109/JQE.1986.1073172 |
[8] | Hirsch JE. Spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 83, 1834–1837 (1999). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1834 |
[9] | Kato YK, Myers RC, Gossard AC, Awschalom DD. Observation of the spin Hall effect in semiconductors. Science 306, 1910–1913 (2004). doi: 10.1126/science.1105514 |
[10] | Sinova J, Culcer D, Niu Q, Sinitsyn NA, Jungwirth T et al. Universal intrinsic spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 92, 126603 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126603 |
[11] | Zhang F, Guo YH, Pu MB, Li X, Ma XL et al. Metasurfaces enabled by asymmetric photonic spin-orbit interactions. Opto-Electron Eng 47, 200366 (2020). doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200366 |
[12] | Shahzadi M, Zheng CY, Ahmad S, Wang SS, Zhang WL. Exciton-polariton based WS2 polarization modulator controlled by optical Stark beam. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 200066 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oea.2022.200066 |
[13] | Wolf SA, Awschalom DD, Buhrman RA, Daughton JM, von Molnár S et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488–1495 (2001). doi: 10.1126/science.1065389 |
[14] | Awschalom DD, Flatté ME. Challenges for semiconductor spintronics. Nat Phys 3, 153–159 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphys551 |
[15] | Chappert C, Fert A, Van Dau FN. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat Mater 6, 813–823 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nmat2024 |
[16] | Jungwirth T, Niu Q, MacDonald AH. Anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic semiconductors. Phys Rev Lett 88, 207208 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.207208 |
[17] | Nagaosa N, Sinova J, Onoda S, MacDonald AH, Ong NP. Anomalous hall effect. Rev Mod Phys 82, 1539–1592 (2010). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539 |
[18] | Liang T, Lin JJ, Gibson Q, Kushwaha S, Liu MH et al. Anomalous Hall effect in ZrTe5. Nat Phys 14, 451–455 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0078-z |
[19] | Yu R, Zhang W, Zhang HJ, Zhang SC, Dai X et al. Quantized anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators. Science 329, 61–64 (2010). doi: 10.1126/science.1187485 |
[20] | Chang CZ, Zhang JS, Feng X, Shen J, Zhang ZC et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167–170 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1234414 |
[21] | He K, Wang YY, Xue QK. Quantum anomalous Hall effect. Natl Sci Rev 1, 38–48 (2014). doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwt029 |
[22] | Deng YJ, Yu YJ, Shi MZ, Guo ZX, Xu ZH et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4. Science 367, 895–900 (2020). doi: 10.1126/science.aax8156 |
[23] | Kane CL, Mele EJ. Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 95, 226801 (2005). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 |
[24] | Kane CL, Mele EJ. Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 95, 146802 (2005). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802 |
[25] | Bernevig BA, Zhang SC. Quantum spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 96, 106802 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.106802 |
[26] | Bernevig BA, Hughes TL, Zhang SC. Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–1761 (2006). doi: 10.1126/science.1133734 |
[27] | Bliokh KY, Smirnova D, Nori F. Quantum spin Hall effect of light. Science 348, 1448–1451 (2015). doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9519 |
[28] | Wu SF, Fatemi V, Gibson QD, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T et al. Observation of the quantum spin Hall effect up to 100 kelvin in a monolayer crystal. Science 359, 76–79 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aan6003 |
[29] | Rycerz A, Tworzydło J, Beenakker CWJ. Valley filter and valley valve in graphene. Nat Phys 3, 172–175 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphys547 |
[30] | Xiao D, Yao W, Niu Q. Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport. Phys Rev Lett 99, 236809 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.236809 |
[31] | Lundt N, Dusanowski Ł, Sedov E, Stepanov P, Glazov MM et al. Optical valley Hall effect for highly valley-coherent exciton-polaritons in an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat Nanotechnol 14, 770–775 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0492-0 |
[32] | Bliokh KY, Bliokh YP. Modified geometrical optics of a smoothly inhomogeneous isotropic medium: the anisotropy, Berry phase, and the optical Magnus effect. Phys Rev E 70, 026605 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.026605 |
[33] | Bliokh KY, Bliokh YP. Topological spin transport of photons: the optical Magnus effect and Berry phase. Phys Lett A 333, 181–186 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.10.035 |
[34] | Bliokh KY, Bliokh YP. Polarization, transverse shifts, and angular momentum conservation laws in partial reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave packet. Phys Rev E 75, 066609 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.066609 |
[35] | Liberman VS, Zel’dovich BY. Spin-orbit interaction of a photon in an inhomogeneous medium. Phys Rev A 46, 5199–5207 (1992). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.5199 |
[36] | Bliokh KY, Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Nori F, Zayats AV. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nat Photonics 9, 796–808 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 |
[37] | Ling XH, Zhou XX, Huang K, Liu YC, Qiu CW et al. Recent advances in the spin Hall effect of light. Rep Prog Phys 80, 066401 (2017). doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa5397 |
[38] | Andrews DL, Babiker M. The Angular Momentum of Light (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2013). |
[39] | Pancharatnam S. Generalized theory of interference and its applications. Proc Indian Acad Sci A 44, 398–417 (1956). doi: 10.1007/BF03046095 |
[40] | Berry MV. Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes. Proc Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 392, 45–57 (1984). |
[41] | Shapere A, Wilczek F. Geometric Phases in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989). |
[42] | Vinitskiĭ SI, Derbov VL, Dubovik VM, Markovski BL, Stepanovskiĭ YP. Topological phases in quantum mechanics and polarization optics. Sov Phys Usp 33, 403–428 (1990). doi: 10.1070/PU1990v033n06ABEH002598 |
[43] | Bhandari R. Polarization of light and topological phases. Phys Rep 281, 1–64 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00029-4 |
[44] | Bliokh KY, Gorodetski Y, Kleiner V, Hasman E. Coriolis effect in optics: unified geometric phase and spin-Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 101, 030404 (2008). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.030404 |
[45] | Hosten O, Kwiat P. Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 319, 787–790 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1152697 |
[46] | Kavokin A, Malpuech G, Glazov M. Optical spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 95, 136601 (2005). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.136601 |
[47] | Leyder C, Romanelli M, Karr JP, Giacobino E, Liew TCH et al. Observation of the optical spin Hall effect. Nat Phys 3, 628–631 (2007). doi: 10.1038/nphys676 |
[48] | Kammann E, Liew TCH, Ohadi H, Cilibrizzi P, Tsotsis P et al. Nonlinear optical spin Hall effect and long-range spin transport in polariton lasers. Phys Rev Lett 109, 036404 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.036404 |
[49] | Lekenta K, Król M, Mirek R, Łempicka K, Stephan D et al. Tunable optical spin Hall effect in a liquid crystal microcavity. Light Sci Appl 7, 74 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41377-018-0076-z |
[50] | Gianfrate A, Bleu O, Dominici L, Ardizzone V, De Giorgi M et al. Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift. Nature 578, 381–385 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1989-2 |
[51] | Rauch H, Werner SA. Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, Wave-Particle Duality, and Entanglement 2nd ed (University of Oxford, Oxford, 2015). |
[52] | Allen L, Padgett MJ, Babiker M. IV The orbital angular momentum of light. Prog Opt 39, 291–372 (1999). |
[53] | Franke-Arnold S, Allen L, Padgett M. Advances in optical angular momentum. Laser Photon Rev 2, 299–313 (2008). doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810007 |
[54] | Bliokh KY, Nori F. Transverse and longitudinal angular momenta of light. Phys Rep 592, 1–38 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.06.003 |
[55] | Allen L, Barnett SM, Padgett MJ. Optical Angular Momentum (CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2014). |
[56] | Poynting JH. The wave motion of a revolving shaft, and a suggestion as to the angular momentum in a beam of circularly polarised light. Proc Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 82, 560–567 (1909). |
[57] | Beth RA. Mechanical detection and measurement of the angular momentum of light. Phys Rev 50, 115–125 (1936). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.50.115 |
[58] | Allen L, Beijersbergen MW, Spreeuw RJC, Woerdman JP. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys Rev A 45, 8185–8189 (1992). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 |
[59] | O'Neil AT, MacVicar I, Allen L, Padgett MJ. Intrinsic and extrinsic nature of the orbital angular momentum of a light beam. Phys Rev Lett 88, 053601 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.053601 |
[60] | Marrucci L, Manzo C, Paparo D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Phys Rev Lett 96, 163905 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 |
[61] | Marrucci L, Karimi E, Slussarenko S, Piccirillo B, Santamato E et al. Spin-to-orbital conversion of the angular momentum of light and its classical and quantum applications. J Opt 13, 064001 (2011). doi: 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 |
[62] | Bomzon Z, Gu M, Shamir J. Angular momentum and geometrical phases in tight-focused circularly polarized plane waves. Appl Phys Lett 89, 241104 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2402909 |
[63] | Zhao YQ, Edgar JS, Jeffries GDM, McGloin D, Chui DT. Spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in a strongly focused optical beam. Phys Rev Lett 99, 073901 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.073901 |
[64] | Rodríguez-Herrera OG, Lara D, Bliokh KY, Ostrovskaya EA, Dainty C. Optical nanoprobing via spin-orbit interaction of light. Phys Rev Lett 104, 253601 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.253601 |
[65] | Petersen J, Volz J, Rauschenbeutel A. Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light. Science 346, 67–71 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1257671 |
[66] | O’Connor D, Ginzburg P, Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Wurtz GA, Zayats AV. Spin–orbit coupling in surface plasmon scattering by nanostructures. Nat Commun 5, 5327 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ncomms6327 |
[67] | Alexeyev CN, Yavorsky MA. Topological phase evolving from the orbital angular momentum of ‘coiled’ quantum vortices. J Opt A:Pure Appl Opt 8, 752–758 (2006). doi: 10.1088/1464-4258/8/9/008 |
[68] | Bliokh KY. Geometrical optics of beams with vortices: berry phase and orbital angular momentum Hall effect. Phys Rev Lett 97, 043901 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.043901 |
[69] | Aharonov Y, Anandan J. Phase change during a cyclic quantum evolution. Phys Rev Lett 58, 1593–1596 (1987). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593 |
[70] | Samuel J, Bhandari R. General setting for Berry’s phase. Phys Rev Lett 60, 2339–2342 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2339 |
[71] | Jordan TF. Berry phases for partial cycles. Phys Rev A 38 1590–1592 (1988). |
[72] | Simon R, Kimble HJ, Sudarshan ECG. Evolving geometric phase and its dynamical manifestation as a frequency shift: an optical experiment. Phys Rev Lett 61, 19–22 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.19 |
[73] | Bhandari R, Samuel J. Observation of topological phase by use of a laser interferometer. Phys Rev Lett 60, 1211–1213 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1211 |
[74] | Bliokh KY, Niv A, Kleiner V, Hasman E. Geometrodynamics of spinning light. Nat Photonics 2, 748–753 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2008.229 |
[75] | Lipson SG. Berry’s phase in optical interferometry: a simple derivation. Opt Lett 15, 154–155 (1990). doi: 10.1364/OL.15.000154 |
[76] | Rytov S. On transition from wave to geometrical optics. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 18, 263–266 (1938). |
[77] | Vladimirskii VV. The rotation of polarization plane for curved light ray. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 21, 222 (1941). |
[78] | Berry MV. The adiabatic phase and Pancharatnam's phase for polarized light. J Mod Opt 34, 1401–1407 (1987). doi: 10.1080/09500348714551321 |
[79] | Bomzon Z, Kleiner V, Hasman E. Pancharatnam–Berry phase in space-variant polarization-state manipulations with subwavelength gratings. Opt Lett 26, 1424–1426 (2001). doi: 10.1364/OL.26.001424 |
[80] | Hasman E, Kleiner V, Biener G, Niv A. Polarization dependent focusing lens by use of quantized Pancharatnam–Berry phase diffractive optics. Appl Phys Lett 82, 328–330 (2003). doi: 10.1063/1.1539300 |
[81] | Piccirillo B, D’Ambrosio V, Slussarenko S, Marrucci L, Santamato E. Photon spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion via an electrically tunable q-plate. Appl Phys Lett 97, 241104 (2010). doi: 10.1063/1.3527083 |
[82] | Sun SL, Yang KY, Wang CM, Juan TK, Chen WT et al. High-efficiency broadband anomalous reflection by gradient meta-surfaces. Nano Lett 12, 6223–6229 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl3032668 |
[83] | Sun SL, He Q, Xiao SY, Xu Q, Li X et al. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat Mater 11, 426–431 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nmat3292 |
[84] | Ding F, Wang ZX, He SL, Shalaev VM, Kildishev AV. Broadband high-efficiency half-wave plate: a supercell-based plasmonic metasurface approach. ACS Nano 9, 4111–4119 (2015). doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b00218 |
[85] | Luo WJ, Sun SL, Xu HX, He Q, Zhou L. Transmissive ultrathin Pancharatnam-Berry metasurfaces with nearly 100% efficiency. Phys Rev Appl 7, 044033 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.044033 |
[86] | Zhang K, Yuan YY, Ding XM, Li HY, Ratni B et al. Polarization-engineered noninterleaved metasurface for integer and fractional orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Laser Photon Rev 15, 2000351 (2021). doi: 10.1002/lpor.202000351 |
[87] | Zhao JJ, Li BW, Chen ZN, Qiu CW. Manipulating acoustic wavefront by inhomogeneous impedance and steerable extraordinary reflection. Sci Rep 3, 2537 (2013). doi: 10.1038/srep02537 |
[88] | Qiao PF, Yang WJ, Chang-Hasnain CJ. Recent advances in high-contrast metastructures, metasurfaces, and photonic crystals. Adv Opt Photonics 10, 180–245 (2018). doi: 10.1364/AOP.10.000180 |
[89] | Ling XH, Zhou XX, Yi XN, Shu WX, Liu YC et al. Giant photonic spin Hall effect in momentum space in a structured metamaterial with spatially varying birefringence. Light Sci Appl 4, e290 (2015). doi: 10.1038/lsa.2015.63 |
[90] | Liu YC, Ke YG, Luo HL, Wen SC. Photonic spin Hall effect in metasurfaces: a brief review. Nanophotonics 6, 51–70 (2017). doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2015-0155 |
[91] | Goos F, Hänchen HL. Ein neuer und fundamentaler Versuch zur Totalreflexion. Ann Phys 436, 333–346 (1947). doi: 10.1002/andp.19474360704 |
[92] | Artmann K. Berechnung der Seitenversetzung des totalreflektierten Strahles. Ann Phys 437, 87–102 (1948). doi: 10.1002/andp.19484370108 |
[93] | Jayaswal G, Mistura G, Merano M. Weak measurement of the Goos–Hänchen shift. Opt Lett 38, 1232–1234 (2013). doi: 10.1364/OL.38.001232 |
[94] | Wu WJ, Zhang WS, Chen SZ, Ling XH, Shu WX et al. Transitional Goos-Hänchen effect due to the topological phase transitions. Opt Express 26, 23705–23713 (2018). doi: 10.1364/OE.26.023705 |
[95] | Zhou X, Liu SQ, Ding YP, Min L, Luo ZM. Precise control of positive and negative Goos-Hänchen shifts in graphene. Carbon 149, 604–608 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.064 |
[96] | Fedorov FI. On polarization of electromagnetic waves. Dikl Akad Nauk SSSR 102, 69–71 (1955). |
[97] | Imbert C. Calculation and experimental proof of the transverse shift induced by total internal reflection of a circularly polarized light beam. Phys Rev D 5, 787–796 (1972). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.5.787 |
[98] | Jayaswal G, Mistura G, Merano M. Observation of the Imbert–Fedorov effect via weak value amplification. Opt Lett 39, 2266–2269 (2014). doi: 10.1364/OL.39.002266 |
[99] | Das A, Mandal S, Pradhan M. Observation of Imbert–Fedorov shift in monolayer MoS2 via quantum weak measurement. Opt Lett 46, 5826–5829 (2021). doi: 10.1364/OL.443394 |
[100] | Qin Y, Li Y, He HY, Gong QH. Measurement of spin Hall effect of reflected light. Opt Lett 34, 2551–2553 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002551 |
[101] | Qin Y, Li Y, Feng XB, Xiao YF, Yang H et al. Observation of the in-plane spin separation of light. Opt Express 19, 9636–9645 (2011). doi: 10.1364/OE.19.009636 |
[102] | Kong LJ, Wang XL, Li SM, Li YN, Chen J et al. Spin Hall effect of reflected light from an air-glass interface around the Brewster’s angle. Appl Phys Lett 100, 071109 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.3687186 |
[103] | Ménard JM, Mattacchione AE, Betz M, van Driel HM. Imaging the spin Hall effect of light inside semiconductors via absorption. Opt Lett 34, 2312–2314 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OL.34.002312 |
[104] | Yin XB, Ye ZL, Rho J, Wang Y, Zhang X. Photonic spin Hall effect at metasurfaces. Science 339, 1405–1407 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1231758 |
[105] | Haefner D, Sukhov S, Dogariu A. Spin Hall effect of light in spherical geometry. Phys Rev Lett 102, 123903 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.123903 |
[106] | Jia GY, Zhang RX, Huang ZX, Ma QY, Wang HW et al. Tunable photonic spin Hall effect due to the chiral Hall effect in strained Weyl semimetals. New J Phys 23, 073010 (2021). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac068d |
[107] | Luo HL, Wen SC, Shu WX, Tang ZX, Zou YH et al. Spin Hall effect of a light beam in left-handed materials. Phys Rev A 80, 043810 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.043810 |
[108] | Luo HL, Wen SC, Shu WX, Fan DY. Spin Hall effect of light in photon tunneling. Phys Rev A 82, 043825 (2010). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.043825 |
[109] | Luo HL, Ling XH, Zhou XX, Shu WX, Wen SC et al. Enhancing or suppressing the spin Hall effect of light in layered nanostructures. Phys Rev A 84, 033801 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.033801 |
[110] | Luo HL, Zhou XX, Shu WX, Wen SC, Fan DY. Enhanced and switchable spin Hall effect of light near the Brewster angle on reflection. Phys Rev A 84, 043806 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043806 |
[111] | Zhou XX, Xiao ZC, Luo HL, Wen SC. Experimental observation of the spin Hall effect of light on a nanometal film via weak measurements. Phys Rev A 85, 043809 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.043809 |
[112] | Zhou XX, Ling XH, Luo HL, Wen SC. Identifying graphene layers via spin Hall effect of light. Appl Phys Lett 101, 251602 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.4772502 |
[113] | Zhou XX, Zhang J, Ling XH, Chen SZ, Luo HL et al. Photonic spin Hall effect in topological insulators. Phys Rev A 88, 053840 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053840 |
[114] | Cai L, Liu MX, Chen SZ, Liu YC, Shu WX et al. Quantized photonic spin Hall effect in graphene. Phys Rev A 95, 013809 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013809 |
[115] | Mi CQ, Chen SZ, Zhou XX, Tian K, Luo HL et al. Observation of tiny polarization rotation rate in total internal reflection via weak measurements. Photonics Res 5, 92–96 (2017). doi: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000092 |
[116] | Chen SZ, Mi CQ, Wu WJ, Zhang WS, Shu WX et al. Weak-value amplification for Weyl-point separation in momentum space. New J Phys 20, 103050 (2018). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aae2d5 |
[117] | Zhang WS, Wu WJ, Chen SZ, Zhang J, Ling XH et al. Photonic spin Hall effect on the surface of anisotropic two-dimensional atomic crystals. Photonics Res 6, 511–516 (2018). doi: 10.1364/PRJ.6.000511 |
[118] | Chen SZ, Ling XH, Shu WX, Luo HL, Wen SC. Precision measurement of the optical conductivity of atomically thin crystals via the photonic spin Hall effect. Phys Rev Appl 13, 014057 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.014057 |
[119] | Xu WH, Yang Q, Ye GZ, Wu WJ, Zhang WS et al. Giant photonic spin Hall effect near the Dirac points. Phys Rev A 101, 023826 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.023826 |
[120] | Chen SZ, Zhou XX, Ling XH, Shu WX, Luo HL et al. Measurement of the optical constants of monolayer MoS2 via the photonic spin Hall effect. Appl Phys Lett 118, 111104 (2021). doi: 10.1063/5.0042422 |
[121] | Wu YP, Liu SQ, Chen SZ, Luo HL, Wen SC. Examining the optical model of graphene via the photonic spin Hall effect. Opt Lett 47, 846–849 (2022). doi: 10.1364/OL.450039 |
[122] | Steinberg AM, Kwiat PG, Chiao RY. Measurement of the single-photon tunneling time. Phys Rev Lett 71, 708–711 (1993). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.708 |
[123] | Balcou P, Dutriaux L. Dual optical tunneling times in frustrated total internal reflection. Phys Rev Lett 78, 851–854 (1997). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.851 |
[124] | Shitrit N, Bretner I, Gorodetski Y, Kleiner V, Hasman E. Optical spin Hall effects in plasmonic chains. Nano Lett 11, 2038–2042 (2011). doi: 10.1021/nl2004835 |
[125] | Ling XH, Zhou XX, Shu WX, Luo HL, Wen SC. Realization of tunable photonic spin Hall effect by tailoring the Pancharatnam-Berry phase. Sci Rep 4, 5557 (2014). |
[126] | Shitrit N, Yulevich I, Maguid E, Ozeri D, Veksler D et al. Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics. Science 340, 724–726 (2013). doi: 10.1126/science.1234892 |
[127] | Luo WJ, Xiao SY, He Q, Sun SL, Zhou L. Photonic spin Hall effect with nearly 100% efficiency. Adv Opt Mater 3, 1102–1108 (2015). doi: 10.1002/adom.201500068 |
[128] | Aieta F, Genevet P, Kats MA, Yu NF, Blanchard R et al. Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett 12, 4932–4936 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl302516v |
[129] | Ni XJ, Ishii S, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM. Ultra-thin, planar, Babinet-inverted plasmonic metalenses. Light Sci Appl 2, e72 (2013). doi: 10.1038/lsa.2013.28 |
[130] | Tang DL, Wang CT, Zhao ZY, Wang YQ, Pu MB et al. Ultrabroadband superoscillatory lens composed by plasmonic metasurfaces for subdiffraction light focusing. Laser Photon Rev 9, 713–719 (2015). doi: 10.1002/lpor.201500182 |
[131] | Wen DD, Yue FY, Liu WW, Chen SQ, Chen XZ. Geometric metasurfaces for ultrathin optical devices. Adv Opt Mater 6, 1800348 (2018). doi: 10.1002/adom.201800348 |
[132] | Liu YC, Ling XH, Yi XN, Zhou XX, Chen SZ et al. Photonic spin Hall effect in dielectric metasurfaces with rotational symmetry breaking. Opt Lett 40, 756–759 (2015). doi: 10.1364/OL.40.000756 |
[133] | Ling XH, Yi XN, Zhou XX, Liu YC, Shu WX et al. Realization of tunable spin-dependent splitting in intrinsic photonic spin Hall effect. Appl Phys Lett 105, 151101 (2014). doi: 10.1063/1.4898190 |
[134] | Aharonov Y, Albert DZ, Vaidman L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys Rev Lett 60, 1351–1354 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351 |
[135] | Ritchie NWM, Story JG, Hulet RG. Realization of a measurement of a ‘‘weak value’’. Phys Rev Lett 66, 1107–1110 (1991). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1107 |
[136] | Rigol M, Dunjko V, Olshanii M. Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature 452, 854–858 (2008). doi: 10.1038/nature06838 |
[137] | Jordan AN, Martínez-Rincón J, Howell JC. Technical advantages for weak-value amplification: when less is more. Phys Rev X 4, 011031 (2014). |
[138] | Jozsa R. Complex weak values in quantum measurement. Phys Rev A 76, 044103 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.044103 |
[139] | Dixon PB, Starling DJ, Jordan AN, Howell JC. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification. Phys Rev Lett 102, 173601 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173601 |
[140] | Lundeen JS, Sutherland B, Patel A, Stewart C, Bamber C. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature 474, 188–191 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature10120 |
[141] | Resch KJ. Amplifying a tiny optical effect. Science 319, 733–734 (2008). doi: 10.1126/science.1154149 |
[142] | Jia GY, Li G, Zhou Y, Miao XL, Zhou XY. Landau quantisation of photonic spin Hall effect in monolayer black phosphorus. Nanophotonics 9, 225–233 (2020). |
[143] | Liu SQ, Shou YC, Zhou X, Cheng WB, Luo ZM. Lattice-dependent spin Hall effect of light in a Weyl semimetal. Opt Express 28, 10783–10793 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OE.388042 |
[144] | Zhou XX, Li X, Luo HL, Wen SC. Optimal preselection and postselection in weak measurements for observing photonic spin Hall effect. Appl Phys Lett 104, 051130 (2014). doi: 10.1063/1.4864782 |
[145] | Chen SZ, Zhou XX, Mi CQ, Luo HL, Wen SC. Modified weak measurements for the detection of the photonic spin Hall effect. Phys Rev A 91, 062105 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.062105 |
[146] | Chen SZ, Zhou XX, Mi CQ, Liu ZX, Luo HL et al. Dielectric metasurfaces for quantum weak measurements. Appl Phys Lett 110, 161115 (2017). doi: 10.1063/1.4982164 |
[147] | Solntsev AS, Agarwal GS, Kivshar YS. Metasurfaces for quantum photonics. Nat Photonics 15, 327–336 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00793-z |
[148] | Napolitano M, Koschorreck M, Dubost B, Behbood N, Sewell RJ et al. Interaction-based quantum metrology showing scaling beyond the Heisenberg limit. Nature 471, 486–489 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nature09778 |
[149] | Chen G, Zhang LJ, Zhang WH, Peng XX, Xu L et al. Achieving Heisenberg-scaling precision with projective measurement on single photons. Phys Rev Lett 121, 060506 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.060506 |
[150] | Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, Horodecki K. Quantum entanglement. Rev Mod Phys 81, 865–942 (2009). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 |
[151] | Jung J, Park H, Park J, Chang T, Shin J. Broadband metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review from the perspectives of materials and devices. Nanophotonics 9, 3165–3196 (2020). doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2020-0111 |
[152] | He SS, Wang RS, Luo HL. Computing metasurfaces for all-optical image processing: a brief review. Nanophotonics 11, 1083–1108 (2022). doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0823 |
[153] | Ren JL, Li Y, Lin YD, Qin Y, Wu R et al. Spin Hall effect of light reflected from a magnetic thin film. Appl Phys Lett 101, 171103 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.4764008 |
[154] | Qiu XD, Zhou XX, Hu DJ, Du JL, Gao FH et al. Determination of magneto-optical constant of Fe films with weak measurements. Appl Phys Lett 105, 131111 (2014). doi: 10.1063/1.4897195 |
[155] | Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004). doi: 10.1126/science.1102896 |
[156] | Zhang H, Chhowalla M, Liu ZF. 2D nanomaterials: graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem Soc Rev 47, 3015–3017 (2018). doi: 10.1039/C8CS90048E |
[157] | Tan CL, Cao XH, Wu XJ, He QY, Yang J et al. Recent advances in ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials. Chem Rev 117, 6225–6331 (2017). doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00558 |
[158] | Parnell S, Min K, Cakmak M. Kinetic studies of polyurethane polymerization with Raman spectroscopy. Polymer 44, 5137–5144 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00468-3 |
[159] | Zhou XX, Sheng LJ, Ling XH. Photonic spin Hall effect enabled refractive index sensor using weak measurements. Sci Rep 8, 1221 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19713-3 |
[160] | Liu JW, Zeng KM, Xu WH, Chen SZ, Luo HL et al. Ultrasensitive detection of ion concentration based on photonic spin Hall effect. Appl Phys Lett 115, 251102 (2019). doi: 10.1063/1.5130729 |
[161] | Wang RS, Zhou JX, Zeng KM, Chen SZ, Ling XH et al. Ultrasensitive and real-time detection of chemical reaction rate based on the photonic spin hall effect. APL Photonics 5, 016105 (2020). doi: 10.1063/1.5131183 |
[162] | Caulfield HJ, Dolev S. Why future supercomputing requires optics. Nat Photonics 4, 261–263 (2010). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.94 |
[163] | Silva A, Monticone F, Castaldi G, Galdi V, Alù A et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 343, 160–163 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1242818 |
[164] | Solli DR, Jalali B. Analog optical computing. Nat Photonics 9, 704–706 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.208 |
[165] | Liu WL, Li M, Guzzon RS, Norberg EJ, Parker JS et al. A fully reconfigurable photonic integrated signal processor. Nat Photonics 10, 190–195 (2016). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.281 |
[166] | Zhu TF, Zhou YH, Lou YJ, Ye H, Qiu M et al. Plasmonic computing of spatial differentiation. Nat Commun 8, 15391 (2017). doi: 10.1038/ncomms15391 |
[167] | Kwon H, Sounas D, Cordaro A, Polman A, Alù A. Nonlocal metasurfaces for optical signal processing. Phys Rev Lett 121, 173004 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.173004 |
[168] | Zhou Y, Zheng HY, Kravchenko II, Valentine J. Flat optics for image differentiation. Nat Photonics 14, 316–323 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0591-3 |
[169] | Marr D, Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection. Proc Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 207, 187–217 (1980). |
[170] | Zhu TF, Lou YJ, Zhou YH, Zhang JH, Huang JY et al. Generalized spatial differentiation from the spin Hall effect of light and its application in image processing of edge detection. Phys Rev Appl 11, 034043 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.034043 |
[171] | Zhou JX, Qian HL, Chen CF, Zhao JX, Li GR et al. Optical edge detection based on high-efficiency dielectric metasurface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 11137–11140 (2019). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820636116 |
[172] | Cordaro A, Kwon H, Sounas D, Koenderink AF, Alù A et al. High-index dielectric metasurfaces performing mathematical operations. Nano Lett 19, 8418–8423 (2019). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02477 |
[173] | Chen MK, Yan Y, Liu XY, Wu YF, Zhang JC et al. Edge detection with meta-lens: from one dimension to three dimensions. Nanophotonics 10, 3709–3715 (2021). doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0239 |
[174] | Koos C, Vorreau P, Vallaitis T, Dumon P, Bogaerts W et al. All-optical high-speed signal processing with silicon–organic hybrid slot waveguides. Nat Photonics 3, 216–219 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.25 |
[175] | He SS, Zhou JX, Chen SZ, Shu WX, Luo HL et al. Wavelength-independent optical fully differential operation based on the spin–orbit interaction of light. APL Photonics 5, 036105 (2020). doi: 10.1063/1.5144953 |
[176] | Qin F, Ding L, Zhang L, Monticone F, Chum CC et al. Hybrid bilayer plasmonic metasurface efficiently manipulates visible light. Sci Adv 2, e1501168 (2016). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501168 |
[177] | Zhang YB, Liu H, Cheng H, Tian JG, Chen SQ. Multidimensional manipulation of wave fields based on artificial microstructures. Opto-Electron Adv 3, 200002 (2020). doi: 10.29026/oea.2020.200002 |
[178] | Ma XL, Pu MB, Li XH, Guo YH, Luo XG. All-metallic wide-angle metasurfaces for multifunctional polarization manipulation. Opto-Electron Adv 2, 180023 (2019). |
[179] | Guo YH, Zhang SC, Pu MB, He Q, Jin JJ et al. Spin-decoupled metasurface for simultaneous detection of spin and orbital angular momenta via momentum transformation. Light Sci Appl 10, 63 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00497-7 |
[180] | Cao T, Lian M, Chen XY, Mao LB, Liu K et al. Multi-cycle reconfigurable THz extraordinary optical transmission using chalcogenide metamaterials. Opto-Electron Sci 1, 210010 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oes.2022.210010 |
[181] | He SS, Zhou JX, Chen SZ, Shu WX, Luo HL et al. Spatial differential operation and edge detection based on the geometric spin Hall effect of light. Opt Lett 45, 877–880 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OL.386224 |
[182] | Zhou JX, Qian HL, Zhao JX, Tang M, Wu QY et al. Two-dimensional optical spatial differentiation and high-contrast imaging. Natl Sci Rev 8, nwaa176 (2021). doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa176 |
[183] | Yuan YD, Fan F, Zhao CX, Kwok HS, Schadt M. Low-driving-voltage, polarizer-free, scattering-controllable liquid crystal device based on randomly patterned photo-alignment. Opt Lett 45, 3697–3700 (2020). doi: 10.1364/OL.393091 |
[184] | Xiao TT, Yang H, Yang Q, Xu DY, Wang RS et al. Realization of tunable edge-enhanced images based on computing metasurfaces. Opt Lett 47, 925–928 (2022). doi: 10.1364/OL.450988 |
[185] | Jack B, Leach J, Romero J, Franke-Arnold S, Ritsch-Marte M et al. Holographic ghost imaging and the violation of a bell inequality. Phys Rev Lett 103, 083602 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.083602 |
[186] | Moreau PA, Toninelli E, Gregory T, Aspden RS, Morris PA et al. Imaging Bell-type nonlocal behavior. Sci Adv 5, aaw2563 (2019). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw2563 |
[187] | Zhou JX, Liu SK, Qian HL, Li YH, Luo HL et al. Metasurface enabled quantum edge detection. Sci Adv 6, eabc4385 (2020). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc4385 |
[188] | Liu JW, Yang Q, Chen SZ, Xiao ZC, Wen SC et al. Intrinsic optical spatial differentiation enabled quantum dark-field microscopy. Phys Rev Lett 128, 193601 (2022). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.193601 |
[189] | Chi C, Jiang Q, Liu ZX, Zheng LH, Jiang ML et al. Selectively steering photon spin angular momentum via electron-induced optical spin Hall effect. Sci Adv 7, eabf8011 (2021). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8011 |
The spin angular momentum (SAM) and the orbit angular momentum (OAM) of paraxial beams. The transient electric field vector of circularly polarized beam brings the SAM of (a)
Geometric phases and their generation in three-dimensional curved space. (a) The non-trivial parallel transports of wave vector appear in the three-dimensional momentum space to provide geometric phases. (b) Propagation of the fiber axis along a curvilinear trajectory. (c) The non-trivial parallel transport of Stokes vector in three-dimensional Stokes space. (d) The geometric phase gradient is acquired when the circularly polarized beam passes through a nonuniform birefringence wave plate with a locally varying optical axis.
Photonic SHE induced by the spin-redirection RVB phase at an optical interface. (a) The linearly polarized beam splits into the RCP and the LCP components after reflecting from an optical interface, manifested as the spin-dependent splitting. (b) The beam reflection can be regarded as the parallel transport of wave vectors in the momentum space, resulting in the polarization rotation.
Schematic and experimental illustration of photonic SHE induced by the PB phase in a metasurface. (a) The conservation of the spin states as a circularly polarized beam passes through a structured metasurface with a spin-dependent PB phase gradient
Weak measurements of photonic SHE after beam refraction at an air-glass interface. (a) The RCP and LCP components of a wave packet experience opposite transverse shifts after refraction on an air-glass interface. (b) Experimental setup for observing and amplifying the photonic SHE with incident wavelength of 633 nm. Three main steps in weak measurements should be considered: pre-selection, weak interaction and post-selection. The incident beam passes through HWP, L1 and P1 to obtain the pre-selected state
Weak measurements of polarization rotation rate after total internal reflection at optical interface. (a) Experimental setup. A polarized Gaussian beam yielded by the He-Ne Laser strikes on the prism-air interface with the tiny rotation of polarization state, and therefore induces a geometric phase gradient in momentum space. This also appears as the initial spin Hall shift, which can be magnified efficiently after the whole weak measurements process. The lenses (L1 and L2) focus and collimate the light; the 1/4 wave plate (QWP) cooperated with the Glan laser polarizers (GLP1 and GLP2) selects the pre- and the post-selected states, which can be presented on a Poincaré sphere with α and β representing the pre- and post-selected angles correspondingly; 1/2 wave plate (HWP) is used to adjust the light intensity; the CCD camera captures the intensity profiles. (b) The amplified spatial shifts as function of β. (c) The initial spatial shift in position space. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.115, Optica, under the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.
Weak measurements of photonic SHE with a dielectric metasurface possessing PB phase gradient. (a) The photonic metasurface version for experiments on weak measurements. The Glan laser polarizer (GLP1) pre-selects the initial state of the photons emitted by the Laser; the dielectric metasurface (MS) generates a small space-variant phase (i.e., the PB phase) and acts as the weak magnetic field; The combination of the 1/4 wave plate (QWP) and the second polarizer (GLP2) post-selects the final state. (b) The MS is designed with homogeneous phase redirection π, whose optical axis orientation varies periodically only on the x direction with the period d. (c) Amplified shifts as functions of post-selected angle β with purely imaginary weak value. The theoretical predictions with three different transmission distances are presented as the same (black curve), and the experimental data (hollow points) satisfies the predictions. The inset illustrates the initial and final states on the Poincaré sphere. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.146, AIP Publishing.
Application examples of precision measurement on nanometal film parameters using photonic SHE. (a) Schematic and the experimental results of measuring the thickness of an Ag film with weak measurements. Left: A linearly polarized beam reflects on the air-Ag film-BK7 glass system at an angle θi and then splits into RCP and LCP components with transverse shifts of δ+ and δ–, respectively. Middle: the experimental setup for weak measurements of photonic SHE after beam reflection at Ag sample. Right: experimentally measured amplified spin Hall shifts as functions of incident angle at different thicknesses (12 nm and 30 nm) of Ag films. (b) Schematic and the experimental results of measuring the magneto-optical constant of Fe films with weak measurements. Left: the experimental setup for weak measurements of spin Hall shifts after beam reflection at sample Fe films (thickness of 450 nm), where the electromagnet (EM) and the magnetic field applied on the magnetic film perpendicularly. Middle: The amplitude (squares) and phase factor (circles) of the magneto-optical constant Q in the sample fit well with the experimental data, where the dotted lines are the fitting lines. Right: The light intensities for
Application examples of accurate determination on 2D atomic crystal parameters using photonic SHE. (a) Schematic and the experimental results of determining the conductivity of graphene with weak measurements. Left: the experimental setup for weak measurements of photonic SHE after beam reflection in graphene. Middle: the amplified spin Hall shifts in monolayer graphene as functions of post-selected angle β. Theoretical results for optical conductivity taken as 0.67σ0, 0.90σ0, 1.1σ0, and 1.33σ0, and the fitting curves are obtained on the basis of three groups of data (in unit of σ0). The result without graphene (in red) is also given for comparison. Right: Measurement of the optical conductivity for monolayer, bilayer, and trilayer graphene, where the horizontal green lines correspond to the values 0.90σ0, and 1.1σ0. (b) Schematic of two optical models of graphene and its examination. Left: the geometry of a planewave incident on graphene at an angle θi for the zero-thickness model and the slab model, where the insets illustrate the beam propagation through side views of the models. Right: Measurements of the spin Hall shifts for monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, fivelayer, and without graphene (red, blue, green, orange, and black curves) as functions of the incident angle. The corresponding theoretical predictions based on different models are also shown: the solid curves, the zero-thickness model; the dash dotted curves and the dashed curves, the slab model with refractive indices 2.6 + 1.3i and 3.0 + 1.149i, respectively. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref. 118, American Physical Society; (a, b) ref.121, The Optical Society.
Application examples of chemical solution detection and biosensing using photonic SHE. (a) Schematic and the experimental results of detecting the ion concentration in solution with weak measurements. Left: the experimental setup for ion concentration detection. HWP, 1/2 wave plate; GLP1 and GLP2, the Glan laser polarizers to obtain the pre- and post-selected states (represented on a Poincaré sphere in the inset). An external magnetic field is applied in such a weak measurement system, and the polarization plane will rotate (Faraday rotation) with a small angle Δ after the beam crossing the magneto-optical media, as shown in the top middle. Bottom middle: the dependence of amplified spin Hall shifts on Δ without the external magnetic field, where the insets show the corresponding intensity distributions. Right: the experimental detection result of ion concentration of three samples NaCl, MgCl2 and CaCl2 based on the amplified spin-Hall shifts. (b) Schematic and the experimental results of monitoring sucrose hydrolysis rates with weak measurements. Top left: schematic to illustrate the process of sucrose hydrolysis. Bottom left: the optical activity of chiral molecules. The polarization plane of a linearly polarized beam will rotate at an angle α1(α2) after passing through glucose and fructose. Middle: experimental system of weak measurements similar to that in (a) by replacing the sample and external magnetic field with CS (sucrose). The insets illustrate the variation of polarization states in weak measurements. Right: the amplified pointer shifts as functions of time (sucrose hydrolysis rates) for different concentrations of acid. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.160, AIP Publishing; (b) ref.161, under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Spatial differentiation and image edge detection based on photonic SHE of beam reflection. The spatial differentiation is constituted mainly by the photonic SHE at the optical reflection interface and two polarizers. The beam is reflected on an optical planar interface between two isotropic materials to obtain the spin-dependent splitting. The two polarizers (dark gray) are oriented at the angles indicated with double-head arrows: (a) preparing along x and analyzing along y and (b) vice versa. (c) and (d) are the corresponding edge detection for different images stored in
Optical full differentiator and image edge detection based on photonic SHE at an optical interface. (a) Schematic of the optical full differentiator. The double-head arrows represent the polarization axis of two applied polarizers, which fed a complete “SPIN” image and outputs its edge image. (b) Experimental setup for image edge detection based on the optical full differentiator. The 4f system is critically introduced by lenses (L): L1 and L2 form the first 4f system; L3 and L4 constitute the second 4f system; the object is stored at the front focal plane of L1, the optical path between L2 and L3 equals the sum of their focal lengths, and the CCD is placed at the rear focal plane of L4. The inset presents the USAF-1951 resolution target (object). Under such a setup, the edge images can be obtained at both the wavelength of (c) 632.8 nm and (d) 532 nm. The first row shows the complete and edge images of number 2, the second row indicates the images of letter S, and the third row denotes that of horizontal stripes. The white double-headed arrows represent the polarization angle of the incident beam as 0°, 10° and 40°. Figure reproduced with permssion from ref.175, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Broadband edge detection based on photonic SHE in high-efficiency PB phase metasurfaces. (a) Experimental setup: two lenses form a 4f system, and the metasurface (sample) is sandwiched by two polarizers (P1 and P2). L1 and L2: a pair of lenses. (b) Top: photograph of the metasurface embedded in glass with its optical axis orientation in one period indicated by red bars. Bottom: the RCP and LCP photons acquire the opposite external orbit angular momentum after the interaction with the metasurface, manifesting as the RCP and the LCP images with a slight shift at the image plane. (c) Broadband edge-detection demonstration. The first row shows the images without the analyzer, and the second row are the edge image after the crossed polarizers. The metasurface period here is 8000 μm, and the illumination wavelengths are 430 nm, 500 nm, and 670 nm, respectively. (d) Various results of edge detection with different phase gradient periods of 500 μm, 750 μm, 1000 μm, and 8000 μm. The first row is photographs of different metasurface samples; the second row indicates polarized images of the samples (scale bar, 125 μm); the third row shows two separated RCP and LCP images without the analyzer; the fourth row gives edge images corresponding to different resolutions. The wavelength is fixed as 500 nm. Figure reproduced from: ref.171, under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0.
Broadband 2D spatial differentiator and high-contrast edge detection of phase objects based on PB phase metasurfaces. (a) The phase metasurface sample. Left: photograph of a metasurface embedded in silica glass; Middle: zoomed polariscope image of the sample pattern area and its finer structure, where the inset represents the top view of scanning electron microscope (SEM); Right: the slow axis orientation of the sample in pseudo color. (b) Setup of the spatial differentiator and its measurements of the spatial transfer function. Left: the experimental setup, where the phase metasurface is sandwiched by two orthogonal polarizers; Middle: the experimental results without and with the spatial differentiator correspondingly. Right: both the theoretical and the experimental outputs of the transfer function. (c) Micro-scale imaging schemes of bright field, phase contrast, dark field, and edge detection. The first row denotes the detected human umbilical vein endothelial cell, and the second row shows the observed human bronchial epithelial cell. (d) Experimental setup for the edge detection of a phase object. The output laser, coupled to the measurement system by a fiber coupler, expands to provide uniform illumination for the field view of the microscope by using a condenser. The cell sample and the metasurface sample are respectively placed in front or at back focal plane of the objective. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.182, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Quantum switchable edge detection based on photonic SHE in PB phase metasurfaces. (a) Experimental setup for metasurface enabled quantum edge detection. BDM, broadband dielectric mirror; PPKTP crystal, periodically polarized KTiOPO4 crystal; DHWP, dual-wavelength 1/2 wave plate; DPBS, dual-wavelength polarization beam splitter; DM, dichroic mirror; SPAD, single photon avalanche detector; PBS, polarization beam splitter; FC, fiber coupler; BPF, band-pass filter; ICCD, intensified charge coupled device. The entangled photon source is in wavelength of 405 nm (810 nm) light for the blue (red) light path. The edge detection switch runs on the forecast end, and the edge detection system is placed on the imaging end. (b) Top: the illustration of coincidence measurement, where the question mark “?” implies unknown polarization state in the trigger arm, and the image would be a superposition of the “solid cat” and the “outlined cat” if the Schrodinger cat is illuminated by unknown linear polarized photons from the polarized entangled source. Bottom: the schematic of controlling the image detection via polarization switch, where polarization