Citation: |
|
[1] | Ekinci T O, Mayer J R R, Cloutier G M. Investigation of accuracy of aerostatic guideways[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2009, 49(6): 478-487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.01.001 |
[2] | 张昔峰, 黄强先, 袁钰, 等.具有角度修正功能的大行程二维纳米工作台[J].光学 精密工程, 2013, 21(7): 1811-1817. Zhang X F, Huang Q X, Yuan Y, et al. Large stroke 2-DOF nano-positioning stage with angle error correction[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(7): 1811-1817. |
[3] | Zhang J H, Menq C H. A linear/angular interferometer capable of measuring large angular motion[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 1999, 10(12): 1247-1253. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/10/12/317 |
[4] | Menq C H, Zhang J H, Shi J. Design and development of an interferometer with improved angular tolerance and its application to x-y theta measurement[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2000, 71(12): 4633-4638. doi: 10.1063/1.1326058 |
[5] | 房丰洲, 张奕群, 张国雄.空间物体六自由度定位术[J].航空精密制造技术, 1998(2): 39-41. Fang F Z, Zhang Y Q, Zhang G X. A posion-setting method of six-freedoms in space[J]. Aviation Precision Manufacturing Technology, 1998(2): 39-41. |
[6] | Kim J A, Bae E W, Kim S H, et al. Design methods for six-degree-of-freedom displacement measurement systems using cooperative targets[J]. Precision Engineering, 2002, 26(1): 99-104. |
[7] | 郑三超, 周素梅, 黄高坤, 等.基于方形孔径微透镜阵列二维叠栅条纹的微小角度测量[J].光学学报, 2018, 38(2): 0205002. Zheng S C, Zhou S M, Huang G K, et al. Micro-angle measurement based on two-dimensional moire fringes generated by square aperture micro-lens array[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 0205002. |
[8] | Khodadad D, Singh A K, Pedrini G, et al. Full-field 3D deformation measurement: comparison between speckle phase and displacement evaluation[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(27): 7735-7743. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.007735 |
[9] | 刘永东, 王佳, 梁晋文.动态目标全姿态激光跟踪测量[J].激光与红外, 1999, 29(3): 148-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.1999.03.006 Liu Y D, Wang J, Liang J W. Dynamic target pose measurement by laser tracking[J]. Laser & Infrared, 1999, 29(3): 148-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.1999.03.006 |
[10] | 匡萃方, 冯其波, 刘斌.五维信息同时测量的激光方法[J].激光技术, 2005, 29(3): 322-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3806.2005.03.005 Kuang C F, Feng Q B, Liu B. Methods for simultaneously measuring five-dimension information by laser[J]. Laser Technology, 2005, 29(3): 322-324. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3806.2005.03.005 |
[11] | Wu H, Zhang X M, Gan J Q, et al. High-precision displacement measurement method for three degrees of freedom-compliant mechanisms based on computer micro-vision[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(10): 2594-2600. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.002594 |
[12] | 阮晓东, 李世伦, 诸葛良, 等.用立体视觉测量多自由度机械装置姿态的研究[J].中国机械工程, 2000, 11(5): 571-573. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2000.05.028 Ruan X D, Li S L, Zhuge L, et al. Study on the pose measurement of multi-degree freedom mechanisms with stereovision[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2000, 11(5): 571-573. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2000.05.028 |
[13] | 吕勇, 冯其波, 刘立双, 等.基于多准直光的六自由度测量方法[J].红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(11): 3597-3602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.11.016 Lv Y, Feng Q B, Liu L S, et al. Six-degree-of-freedom measurement method based on multiple collimated beams[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2014, 43(11): 3597-3602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2014.11.016 |
[14] | Kroll J J. Six degree of freedom optical sensor for dynamic measurement of linear axes[D]. Charlotte: University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2003. |
[15] | Thomas B L, Bass H M, Loftus L K, et al. Laser aligned five-axis position measurement device: 5798828[P]. 1998-08-25. |
[16] | 赵转萍, 吕晓明, 郑叔芳, 等.运动目标六自由度单束激光跟踪测量方法研究[J].仪器仪表学报, 2001, 22(S2): 35-36, 38. Zhao Z P, Lv X M, Zheng S F, et al. The study of measuring and tracking of six-freedom object using a single laser beam[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2001, 22(S2): 35-36, 38. |
[17] | Hsieh H L, Pan S W. Three-degree-of-freedom displacement measurement using grating-based heterodyne interferometry[J]. Applied Optics, 2013, 52(27): 6840-6848. doi: 10.1364/AO.52.006840 |
[18] | Kim J W, Kang C S, Kim J A, et al. A compact system for simultaneous measurement of linear and angular displacements of nano-stages[J]. Optics Express, 2007, 15(24): 15759-15766. doi: 10.1364/OE.15.015759 |
[19] | 别业广, 吕清花, 商逸远, 等.基于无衍射光的三自由度误差测量方法[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(4): 81-87. Bie Y G, Lv Q H, Shang Y Y, et al. A method of three-degree-of-freedom measurement based on non-diffracting beam[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 2018, 35(4): 81-87. |
[20] | 翟中生, 赵斌.无衍射光的干涉实验与理论分析[J].光学学报, 2007, 27(8): 1503-1507. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2239.2007.08.032 Zhai Z S, Zhao B. Experiments and theoretical analyses of non-diffracting beams interference[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2007, 27(8): 1503-1507. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2239.2007.08.032 |
Overview: Error motions of a linear stage directly influence the performance of the precision positioning system in which the stage is used. Therefore, it is a critical task to measure the error motions. A measurement method for the determination of three-degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) error motions based on non-diffracting Moiré fringes is proposed.
A semi-transparent mirror (STM), a beam splitter and a mirror are adopted as the measurement head, which is fixed on the moving stage in order to sense 3-DOF angular errors. Two CCDs are used to capture the non-diffracting beams patterns that are carrying the errors. Computer generated holograms (CGHs) are loaded into a liquid crystal spatial light modulator (SLM) to produce non-diffracting beams. A beam splitter prism (BS1), placed after the SLM, splits the non-diffracting beam into two beams, the transmitted beam and the reflection beam. The reflected non-diffracting beam, after reflection by mirror 2, traveling through BS3, is reflected by the STM, and reaches CCD1. The image of the non-diffracting beams is captured by CCD1. The other beam transmits from BS3 to CCD2 after travelling through STM and BS2. The transmitted non-diffracting beam exiting BS1 passes through an attenuator, and then is reflected by mirror 1, from where it meets the beam from the moving unit. These two non-diffracting beams generate non-diffracting Moiré fringes, which are captured by CCD2.
When the stage moves, the position of the central points of the non-diffracting beams (as received by CCD 1) and the forms of Moiré fringes (obtained by CCD 2) will change in relation to different errors. It can measure the 3-DOF errors, which are yaw, pitch, and roll. By analyzing the geometric position of these center points, mathematical models for 3-DOF motion errors are established. Obviously, one of central points in CCD2 will be unchanged while the other one will changes according to different motion errors of stage.
A rotary table is used to simulate the 3-DOF motion errors and demonstrate the theoretical analysis. The measurement head is fixed on the table, which rotates different small angles (0°, 0.125°, 0.25°, 0.375°, 0.5°). The on-diffracting beam and non-diffracting Moiré fringe patterns are obtained by CCD1 and CCD2, respectively. The actual angular displacement is calculated by the offset of the center of the spot with the mathematical models. Compared with the theoretical value, the angular displacement error is less than 0.0104°, which verifies the feasibility and correctness of the 3-DOF measurement system for non-diffracting Moiré fringes.
Non-diffracting Moiré fringes.
Schematic diagram of measurement system of 3-DOF error motions
Displacement of the central point generated by the yaw α in CCD1. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) Measuring principle
Displacement of the central point generated by the pitch β in CCD1. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) Measuring principle
Displacement of the central point generated by the yaw α in CCD2. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) Measuring principle
Displacement of the central point generated by the pitch β in CCD2. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) Measuring principle
Displacement of the central point generated by the roll γ in CCD2. (a) Schematic diagram; (b) Measuring princip
Experimental results of the 3-DOF in CCD1
Experimental results of the 3-DOF in CCD2
Experimental results calculated by the images in (a) CCD1 and (b) CCD2