Citation: |
|
[1] |
俞建阳. DBD等离子体诱导涡结构控制附面层流动研究[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017.
Yu J Y. Flow control with the vortex induced by DBD plasma in boundary layer flow[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Technology, 2017. |
[2] | 李强, 江涛, 陈苏宇, 等.激波风洞边界层转捩测量技术及应用[J].航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 122740. Li Q, Jiang T, Chen S Y, et al. Measurement technique and application of boundary layer transition in shock tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 122740. |
[3] | 卢晓芬, 张天序, 洪汉玉.气动光学效应像素偏移图像校正方法研究[J].红外与激光工程, 2007, 36(5): 758-761. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2007.05.045 Lu X F, Zhang T X, Hong H Y. Image correction method with pixel deviation caused by aero-optics effects[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2007, 36(5): 758-761. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2007.05.045 |
[4] | 杨富荣, 陈力, 闫博, 等.干涉瑞利散射测速技术在跨超声速风洞的湍流度测试应用研究[J].实验流体力学, 2018, 32(3): 82-86. Yang F R, Chen L, Yan B, et al. Measurement of turbulence velocity fluctuations in transonic wind tunnel using Interferometric Rayleigh Scattering diagnostic technique[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 32(3): 82-86. |
[5] | Ling T, Liu D, Yang Y Y, et al. Off-axis cyclic radial shearing interferometer for measurement of centrally blocked transient wavefront[J]. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(14): 2493-2495. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.002493 |
[6] | 罗积军, 侯素霞, 徐军, 等.环路径向剪切干涉测量激光束波前畸变的研究[C]//第九届全国光电技术学术交流会论文集.北京: 中国宇航学会, 中国航空学会, 中国兵工学会, 中国光学学会, 中国电子学会, 2010. Luo J J, Hou S X, Xu J, et al. Study of measuring laser beam wave-front based on cyclic radial shearing interferometer[C]//Proceedings of National Symposium on Optoelectronic Technology. Beijing: Chinese Society of Astronautics, Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China Ordnance Society, Chinese Optical Society, Chinese Institute of Electronics, 2010. |
[7] | Couch L L, Kalin D A, McNeal T. Experimental investigation of image degradation created by a high-velocity flow field[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 1991, 1486: 417-423. doi: 10.1117/12.45784 |
[8] | Griffin D W. Phase-shifting shearing interferometer[J]. Optics Letters, 2001, 26(3): 140-141. |
[9] | Lam B, Guo C L. Complete characterization of ultrashort optical pulses with a phase-shifting wedged reversal shearing interferometer[J]. Light: Science & Applications, 2018, 7: 30. |
[10] | 杨甬英, 刘东, 王道档, 等.动态变化场的高速高精度实时干涉检测[J].红外与激光工程, 2008, 37(5): 757-760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2008.05.002 Yang Y Y, Liu D, Wang D D, et al. Real-time interferometry with high speed and precision for transient flow field and its applications[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2008, 37(5): 757-760. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2008.05.002 |
[11] |
凌曈.基于多波前剪切干涉与光学层析技术三维折射率场重构研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
Ling T. Reconstruction of three-dimensional refractive index field based on multi-wave shearing interferometry and optical tomography[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016. |
[12] | Gu L Y, Liu L, Hu S Y, et al. Polarization phase-shifting lateral shearing interferometer with two polarization beam splitter plates[J]. Optical Review, 2017, 24(4): 600-604. doi: 10.1007/s10043-017-0351-x |
[13] | Medhi B, Hegde G M, Gorthi S S. Improved quantitative visualization of hypervelocity flow through wavefront estimation based on shadow casting of sinusoidal gratings[J]. Applied Optics, 2016, 55(22): 6060-6071. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.006060 |
[14] | 章辰.偏振相移径向剪切干涉仪及流场动态测量研究[D].成都: 四川大学, 2018. Zhang C. A study of polarization phase shifting radial shearing interferometry and dynamic measurement in flow field[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University, 2018. |
[15] | Thornton D E, Spencer M F, Perram G P. Deep-turbulence wavefront sensing using digital holography in the on-axis phase shifting recording geometry with comparisons to the self-referencing interferometer[J]. Applied Optics, 2019, 58(5): A179-A189. |
[16] | Tian C, Chen X F, Liu S C. Modal wavefront reconstruction in radial shearing interferometry with general aperture shapes[J]. Optics Express, 2016, 24(4): 3572-3583. doi: 10.1364/OE.24.003572 |
[17] | Zhang C, Li D H, Li M M, et al. Wavefront reconstruction algorithm based on interpolation coefficients for radial shearing interferometry[J]. Proceedings of SPIE, 2016, 10155: 1015539. |
[18] | Wang Z Y, Wang S, Yang P, et al. Multiple-wave radial shearing interferometer based on a Fresnel zone plate[J]. Optics Express, 2018, 26(26): 34928-34939. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.034928 |
[19] | Padghan P P, Alti K M. Quantification of nanoscale deformations using electronic speckle pattern interferometer[J]. Optics & Laser Technology, 2018, 107: 72-79. |
[20] | Dai F Z, Zheng Y Z, Bu Y, et al. Modal wavefront reconstruction based on Zernike polynomials for lateral shearing interferometry[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56(1): 61-68. |
[21] | Sessa V, Xie Z T, Herring S. Turbulence and dispersion below and above the interface of the internal and the external boundary layers[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 182: 189-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.021 |
Overview: "Boundary layer" refers to a thin flow layer with a non-negligible viscous force close to the aircraft surface. Its thickness is only a few millimeters of the model surface in the wind tunnel test. It shows typical characteristics of small scale random disturbance, small size and fast change.
The current methods of boundary layer flow display include particle tracer method, oil flow display method and optical measurement method, but they all have their own shortcomings. Particle tracer method is to add smoke generator into the air and show the flow track by observing the density of smoke particles in the flow field. As the size of the smoke particles is much larger than that of the gas molecules, this method will change the composition of the gas. Oil flow display technology is the reaction of the flowing air in the boundary layer to the friction stress on the wall surface. The optical measurement method has no contact and can directly reflect the integral of density difference along the optical path, but the schlieren and shadow methods can only display and cannot calculate the density field quantitatively.
Based on phase difference, the density field of flow field can be calculated quantitatively. However, the traditional interferometry method based on time phase modulation cannot detect a transient change field the interference image is easily interfered due to the influence of vibration generated by high-speed airflow, which is difficult to solve, so it cannot be applied in the boundary layer measurement.
This paper proposed a measurement system based on loop radial shear interference, with high wavefront detection accuracy, good anti-noise and anti-interference performance, and suitable for use in boundary layer measurement. The system adopts the fast transform method based on spatial phase modulation, which loads the information of shear wave surface onto the carrier, and an image can quickly recover the wavefront by using the fast Fourier transform method, avoiding the influence of dynamic changes of measured wavefront and realizing real-time dynamic detection. For the complex wavefront of the boundary layer, the iterative method is used to improve the wavefront reconstruction accuracy. The simulation results show that the residual root mean square (RMS) value is better than 1/20λ. This paper introduces the realization of hardware system and software process in detail. The principle of the algorithm is also presented. The experimental results in a 0.6 m wind tunnel show that the system can restrain the vibration interference and distinguish the disturbance signal and the vibration noise remarkably. The proposed method has broad application prospects in real-time boundary layer measuring.
Principle diagram of aero-optical effect measurement in shear layer
Principle diagram of cyclic radial shearing interferometry
Control chart of synchronized acquisition system
Data processing flow chart
Simulation analysis of the first type wavefront. (a) Original wavefront; (b) Extended wavefront; (c) Wavefront of phase difference; (d) Reconstructed wavefront; (e) Residual
Simulation analysis of the second type wavefront. (a) Original wavefront; (b) Extended wavefront; (c) Wavefront of phase difference; (d) Reconstructed wavefront; (e) Residual
Measured area
Density diagram with model disturbance. (a) 1.2 s; (b) 3.6 s; (c) 4.5 s; (d) 6.3 s; (e) 7.8 s
Time density map of an empty wind tunnel. (a) 1.3 s; (b) 3.4 s; (c) 4.7 s; (d) 6.9 s; (e) 7.7 s