Xie W D, Mu X X, Guo Y X, et al. Research progress of additive manufacturing of high-performance polymers and the applications[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(9): 210137. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210137
Citation: Xie W D, Mu X X, Guo Y X, et al. Research progress of additive manufacturing of high-performance polymers and the applications[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(9): 210137. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210137

Research progress of additive manufacturing of high-performance polymers and the applications

    Fund Project: National Natural Science Foundation of China (51775538), "West Light" Cross-Team Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and The Gansu Province Science and Technology Plan (20JR5RA558)
More Information
  • Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, has been attracted extensive attention and developed rapidly in aerospace, optoelectronic engineering, microelectronics, and other fields due to its unique characteristic of "shape and performance control". Developing 3D printing materials is critical for the practical applications in various fields. Therefore, this article reviews the current high-performance polymeric materials for 3D printing and the advanced intelligent manufacturing technologies. It focuses on the 3D printing technologies of polymers, the high-performance polymeric materials for 3D printing, and the related applications, which can provide new directions and ideas for its research, development and application.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Herzberger J, Sirrine J M, Williams C B, et al. Polymer design for 3D printing elastomers: recent advances in structure, properties, and printing[J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2019, 97: 101144. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101144

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E. Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods[J]. Addit Manuf, 2019, 30: 100894.

    Google Scholar

    [3] Chandrasekaran S, Duoss E B, Worsley M A, et al. 3D printing of high performance cyanate ester thermoset polymers[J]. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(3): 853-858. doi: 10.1039/C7TA09466C

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Turner B N, Gold S A. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: Ⅱ. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness[J]. Rapid Prototyp J, 2015, 21(3): 250-261. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Guo N N, Leu M C. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(3): 215-243. doi: 10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Frazier W E. Metal additive manufacturing: A review[J]. J Mater Eng Perform, 2014, 23(6): 1917-1928. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Chia H N, Wu B M. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials[J]. J Biol Eng, 2015, 9: 4. doi: 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Melchels F P W, Feijen J, Grijpma D W. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(24): 6121-6130. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Gibson I, Shi D P. Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser sintering process[J]. Rapid Prototyp J, 1997, 3(4): 129-136. doi: 10.1108/13552549710191836

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Stansbury J W, Idacavage M J. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(1): 54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Kruth J P, Wang X, Laoui T, et al. Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering[J]. Assem Autom, 2003, 23(4): 357-371. doi: 10.1108/01445150310698652

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Ligon S C, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing[J]. Chem Rev, 2017, 117(15): 10212-10290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Narupai B, Nelson A. 100th anniversary of macromolecular science viewpoint: Macromolecular materials for additive manufacturing[J]. ACS Macro Lett, 2020, 9(5): 627-638. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00200

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Ang T H, Sultana F S A, Hutmacher D W, et al. Fabrication of 3D chitosan-hydroxyapatite scaffolds using a robotic dispensing system[J]. Mater Sci Eng, 2002, 20(1-2): 35-42. doi: 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00010-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(23): 4437-4447. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Oh C H, Hong S J, Jeong I, et al. Development of robotic dispensed bioactive scaffolds and human adipose-derived stem cell culturing for bone tissue engineering[J]. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2010, 16(4): 561-571. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0274

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Lewis J A. Direct-write assembly of ceramics from colloidal inks[J]. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2002, 6(3): 245-250. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00031-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Raney J R, Compton B G, Mueller J, et al. Rotational 3D printing of damage-tolerant composites with programmable mechanics[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115(6): 1198-1203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715157115

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Kotikian A, Truby R L, Boley J W, et al. 3D printing of liquid crystal elastomeric actuators with spatially programed nematic order[J]. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(10): 1706164. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706164

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Bagheri A, Jin J Y. Photopolymerization in 3D printing[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2019, 1(4): 593-611. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00165

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Chatani S, Kloxin C J, Bowman C N, et al. The power of light in polymer science: Photochemical processes to manipulate polymer formation, structure, and properties[J]. Polym Chem, 2014, 5(7): 2187-2201. doi: 10.1039/C3PY01334K

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Jin J, Yang J F, Mao H C, et al. A vibration-assisted method to reduce separation force for stereolithography[J]. J Manuf Process, 2018, 34: 793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.052

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Kim G B, Lee S, Kim H, et al. Three-dimensional printing: Basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2016, 17(2): 182-197. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.182

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Gross B C, Erkal J L, Lockwood S Y, et al. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences[J]. Anal Chem, 2014, 86(7): 3240-3253. doi: 10.1021/ac403397r

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Tumbleston J R, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6228): 1349-1352. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2397

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] Liska R, Schuster M, Inführ R, et al. Photopolymers for rapid prototyping[J]. J Coat Technol Res, 2007, 4(4): 505-510. doi: 10.1007/s11998-007-9059-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] Fortney A, Fossum E. Soluble, semi-crystalline PEEK analogs based on 3, 5-difluorobenzophenone: Synthesis and characterization[J]. Polymer, 2012, 53(12): 2327-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.056

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] Elhattab K, Sikder P, Walker J M, et al. Fabrication and evaluation of 3-D printed PEEK scaffolds containing Macropores by design[J]. Mater Lett, 2020, 263: 127227. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127227

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] Feng P, Wu P, Gao C D, et al. A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair[J]. Adv Sci, 2018, 5(6): 1700817. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700817

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Su Y W, He J K, Jiang N, et al. Additively-manufactured poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) lattice scaffolds with uniform microporous architectures for enhanced cellular response and soft tissue adhesion[J]. Mater Des, 2020, 191: 108671. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108671

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Deng Y, Shi X Y, Chen Y, et al. Bacteria-triggered pH-responsive osteopotentiating coating on 3D-printed polyetheretherketone scaffolds for infective bone defect repair[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2020, 59(26): 12123-12135. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02107

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S. Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer[J]. Tribol Int, 2016, 94: 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.016

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] Yang C C, Tian X Y, Li D C, et al. Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material[J]. J Mater Process Technol, 2017, 248: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] Hu B, Duan X B, Xing Z H, et al. Improved design of fused deposition modeling equipment for 3D printing of high-performance PEEK parts[J]. Mech Mater, 2019, 137: 103139. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103139

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Zheng J B, Kang J F, Sun C N, et al. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 118: 104475. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104475

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] Yaragalla S, Zahid M, Panda J K, et al. Comprehensive enhancement in thermomechanical performance of melt-extruded PEEK filaments by Graphene incorporation[J]. Polymers, 2021, 13(9): 1425. doi: 10.3390/polym13091425

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] Guo Y X, Ji Z Y, Zhang Y, et al. Solvent-free and photocurable polyimide inks for 3D printing[J]. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5(31): 16307-16314. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01952A

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] Hegde M, Meenakshisundaram V, Chartrain N, et al. 3D printing all-aromatic polyimides using mask-projection stereolithography: processing the nonprocessable[J]. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(31): 1701240. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701240

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] Zhang F, Tuck C, Hague R, et al. Inkjet printing of polyimide insulators for the 3D printing of dielectric materials for microelectronic applications[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 2016, 133(18): 43361.

    Google Scholar

    [40] Herzberger J, Meenakshisundaram V, Williams C B, et al. 3D printing all-aromatic polyimides using stereolithographic 3D printing of polyamic acid salts[J]. ACS Macro Lett, 2018, 7(4): 493-497. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00126

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] Guo Y X, Xu J W, Yan C Y, et al. Direct ink writing of high performance architectured polyimides with low dimensional shrinkage[J]. Adv Eng Mater, 2019, 21(5): 1801314. doi: 10.1002/adem.201801314

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [42] Qin S Y, Jiang Y, Ji Z Y, et al. Three-dimensional printing of high-performance polyimide by direct ink writing of hydrogel precursor[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 2021, 138(27): 50636. doi: 10.1002/app.50636

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [43] Wang C Y, Ma S Q, Li D D, et al. 3D printing of lightweight polyimide honeycombs with the high specific strength and temperature resistance[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13(13): 15690-15700. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01992

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] Jiang S L, Liao G X, Xu D D, et al. Mechanical properties analysis of polyetherimide parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling[J]. High Perform Polym, 2019, 31(1): 97-106. doi: 10.1177/0954008317752822

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Wu T, Jiang P, Zhang X Q, et al. Additively manufacturing high-performance bismaleimide architectures with ultraviolet-assisted direct ink writing[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 180: 107947. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107947

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Gouzman I, Atar N, Grossman E, et al. 3D printing of bismaleimides: from new ink formulation to printed thermosetting polymer objects[J]. Adv Mater Technol, 2019, 4(10): 1900368. doi: 10.1002/admt.201900368

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Gan X P, Wang J Z, Wang Z H, et al. Simultaneous realization of conductive segregation network microstructure and minimal surface porous macrostructure by SLS 3D printing[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 178: 107874. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107874

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] Sun S J, Gan X P, Wang Z H, et al. Dynamic healable polyurethane for selective laser sintering[J]. Addit Manuf, 2020, 33: 101176.

    Google Scholar

    [49] Peng S Q, Li Y W, Wu L X, et al. 3D printing mechanically robust and transparent polyurethane elastomers for stretchable electronic sensors[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(5): 6479-6488. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20631

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Joo H, Cho S. Comparative studies on polyurethane composites filled with polyaniline and graphene for DLP-Type 3D printing[J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(1): 67. doi: 10.3390/polym12010067

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] Gama N, Ferreira A, Barros-Timmons A. 3D printed cork/polyurethane composite foams[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 179: 107905. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107905

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] Wang R M, Zheng S R, Zheng Y P. 3-Matrix materials[M]//Wang R M, Zheng S R, Zheng Y P. Polymer Matrix Composites and Technology. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2011: 101-548.

    Google Scholar

    [53] Hmeidat N S, Kemp J W, Compton B G. High-strength epoxy nanocomposites for 3D printing[J]. Compos Sci Technol, 2018, 160: 9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Lin D, Jin S Y, Zhang F, et al. 3D stereolithography printing of graphene oxide reinforced complex architectures[J]. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26(43): 434003. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/43/434003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [55] Park G T, Lee S J, Kim B G, et al. High thermally conductive epoxy composite inks cured by infrared laser irradiation for two-dimensional/three-dimensional printing technology[J]. J Compos Mater, 2020, 54(29): 4635-4643. doi: 10.1177/0021998320935154

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [56] Liu L, Ying G B, Wen D, et al. Aqueous solution-processed MXene (Ti3C2Tx) for non-hydrophilic epoxy resin-based composites with enhanced mechanical and physical properties[J]. Mater Des, 2021, 197: 109276. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109276

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] Jiang Q X, Zhang H G, Rusakov D, et al. Additive manufactured carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposites for heavy-duty applications[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2021, 3(1): 93-97. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.0c01011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Mei H, Ali Z, Yan Y K, et al. Influence of mixed isotropic fiber angles and hot press on the mechanical properties of 3D printed composites[J]. Addit Manuf, 2019, 27: 150-158.

    Google Scholar

    [59] Compton B G, Lewis J A. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites[J]. Adv Mater, 2014, 26(34): 5930-5935. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401804

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [60] Griffini G, Invernizzi M, Levi M, et al. 3D-printable CFR polymer composites with dual-cure sequential IPNs[J]. Polymer, 2016, 91: 174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.048

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Hao W F, Liu Y, Zhou H, et al. Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites[J]. Polym Test, 2018, 65: 29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] Sano Y, Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, et al. 3D printing of discontinuous and continuous fibre composites using stereolithography[J]. Addit Manuf, 2018, 24: 521-527.

    Google Scholar

    [63] Jiang Z R, Erol O, Chatterjee D, et al. Direct ink writing of Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) with tunable mechanical properties[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(31): 28289-28295. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07279

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Zhang Y X, Yin M J, Ouyang X, et al. 3D μ-printing of polytetrafluoroethylene microstructures: A route to superhydrophobic surfaces and devices[J]. Appl Mater Today, 2020, 19: 100580. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100580

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Wu T, Jiang P, Ji Z Y, et al. 3D printing of high-performance isocyanate ester thermosets[J]. Macromol Mater Eng, 2020, 305: 2000397. doi: 10.1002/mame.202000397

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Lu Y, Ng K W J, Chen H, et al. The molecular design of photo-curable and high-strength benzoxazine for 3D printing[J]. Chem Commun, 2021, 57(27): 3375-3378. doi: 10.1039/D0CC07801H

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Overview: Additive manufacturing (AM) is a technology based on the principle of layer-by-layer manufacturing, which can be freely designed. Through point-by-point, line-by-line, and layer-by-layer manufacturing to construct complex parts such as polymers, metals, and ceramics, it is a new type of precise control of the microstructure of printing materials. Manufacturing technology, which reduces the product manufacturing cycle and cost from the design and manufacturing methods, has been rapidly developed and widely used in aerospace, optoelectronic engineering, microelectronics, and other fields. However, the 3D printed polymer complex products lack the strength and functions required by the bearing part, resulting in 3D printing technology and its polymer materials are still in the conceptual prototype and functional design stage. Therefore, this technology has limitations in the manufacturing technology and application fields of complex parts such as heat resistance and high strength. Then, high-performance 3D printing polymer materials with comprehensive properties such as high temperature resistance (> 100 ℃), high mechanical strength, high hardness, and high modulus at the top of the polymer material pyramid is developed to promote the development and application of 3D printing technology. At present, 3D printing technology can achieve complex intelligent finishing high-performance polymer materials including polyimide (PI), polyetherimide (PEI), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), High-performance epoxy, etc.

    Because of their rigid molecular structure, crystallinity, and molecular weight, these high-performance polymers endow them with extremely high heat resistance, high hardness, high mechanical properties, and high modulus, which cannot achieced by traditional processing methods. 3D printing can achieve high-precision, high-complexity, lightweight and miniaturized manufacturing and application of key components. The 3D printing manufacturing technology has "controllability" and the ability to directly form high-precision complex parts in one step, and has the advantages of short molding time, simplified molding equipment, material distribution on demand, and freedom of part design in the manufacture and application of high-precision, high-complexity, miniaturization and lightweight terminal parts. In addition, how to realize the 3D printing preparation and manufacturing of ultra-high-performance polymers has always been a research hotspot in this field and a problem need to be solved. Therefore, with regard to the current polymer 3D printing and application research, this article focuses on the polymer 3D printing technology and the 3D printing research and application of various high-performance polymer materials, and the preparation and application of 3D printing high-performance polymer materials. The development has been prospected, so as to provide new directions and ideas for the research, application and development of 3D printing high-performance polymer (HPP) materials.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(7)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views() PDF downloads() Cited by()

Access History
Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint