Citation: |
|
[1] | Herzberger J, Sirrine J M, Williams C B, et al. Polymer design for 3D printing elastomers: recent advances in structure, properties, and printing[J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2019, 97: 101144. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101144 |
[2] | Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E. Additive manufacturing in construction: A review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods[J]. Addit Manuf, 2019, 30: 100894. |
[3] | Chandrasekaran S, Duoss E B, Worsley M A, et al. 3D printing of high performance cyanate ester thermoset polymers[J]. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6(3): 853-858. doi: 10.1039/C7TA09466C |
[4] | Turner B N, Gold S A. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: Ⅱ. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness[J]. Rapid Prototyp J, 2015, 21(3): 250-261. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2013-0017 |
[5] | Guo N N, Leu M C. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications and research needs[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2013, 8(3): 215-243. doi: 10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 |
[6] | Frazier W E. Metal additive manufacturing: A review[J]. J Mater Eng Perform, 2014, 23(6): 1917-1928. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z |
[7] | Chia H N, Wu B M. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials[J]. J Biol Eng, 2015, 9: 4. doi: 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 |
[8] | Melchels F P W, Feijen J, Grijpma D W. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(24): 6121-6130. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 |
[9] | Gibson I, Shi D P. Material properties and fabrication parameters in selective laser sintering process[J]. Rapid Prototyp J, 1997, 3(4): 129-136. doi: 10.1108/13552549710191836 |
[10] | Stansbury J W, Idacavage M J. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(1): 54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 |
[11] | Kruth J P, Wang X, Laoui T, et al. Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering[J]. Assem Autom, 2003, 23(4): 357-371. doi: 10.1108/01445150310698652 |
[12] | Ligon S C, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing[J]. Chem Rev, 2017, 117(15): 10212-10290. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 |
[13] | Narupai B, Nelson A. 100th anniversary of macromolecular science viewpoint: Macromolecular materials for additive manufacturing[J]. ACS Macro Lett, 2020, 9(5): 627-638. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00200 |
[14] | Ang T H, Sultana F S A, Hutmacher D W, et al. Fabrication of 3D chitosan-hydroxyapatite scaffolds using a robotic dispensing system[J]. Mater Sci Eng, 2002, 20(1-2): 35-42. doi: 10.1016/S0928-4931(02)00010-3 |
[15] | Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(23): 4437-4447. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4 |
[16] | Oh C H, Hong S J, Jeong I, et al. Development of robotic dispensed bioactive scaffolds and human adipose-derived stem cell culturing for bone tissue engineering[J]. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 2010, 16(4): 561-571. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0274 |
[17] | Lewis J A. Direct-write assembly of ceramics from colloidal inks[J]. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2002, 6(3): 245-250. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(02)00031-1 |
[18] | Raney J R, Compton B G, Mueller J, et al. Rotational 3D printing of damage-tolerant composites with programmable mechanics[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115(6): 1198-1203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715157115 |
[19] | Kotikian A, Truby R L, Boley J W, et al. 3D printing of liquid crystal elastomeric actuators with spatially programed nematic order[J]. Adv Mater, 2018, 30(10): 1706164. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706164 |
[20] | Bagheri A, Jin J Y. Photopolymerization in 3D printing[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2019, 1(4): 593-611. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00165 |
[21] | Chatani S, Kloxin C J, Bowman C N, et al. The power of light in polymer science: Photochemical processes to manipulate polymer formation, structure, and properties[J]. Polym Chem, 2014, 5(7): 2187-2201. doi: 10.1039/C3PY01334K |
[22] | Jin J, Yang J F, Mao H C, et al. A vibration-assisted method to reduce separation force for stereolithography[J]. J Manuf Process, 2018, 34: 793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.03.052 |
[23] | Kim G B, Lee S, Kim H, et al. Three-dimensional printing: Basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2016, 17(2): 182-197. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.2.182 |
[24] | Gross B C, Erkal J L, Lockwood S Y, et al. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences[J]. Anal Chem, 2014, 86(7): 3240-3253. doi: 10.1021/ac403397r |
[25] | Tumbleston J R, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6228): 1349-1352. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2397 |
[26] | Liska R, Schuster M, Inführ R, et al. Photopolymers for rapid prototyping[J]. J Coat Technol Res, 2007, 4(4): 505-510. doi: 10.1007/s11998-007-9059-3 |
[27] | Fortney A, Fossum E. Soluble, semi-crystalline PEEK analogs based on 3, 5-difluorobenzophenone: Synthesis and characterization[J]. Polymer, 2012, 53(12): 2327-2333. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.056 |
[28] | Elhattab K, Sikder P, Walker J M, et al. Fabrication and evaluation of 3-D printed PEEK scaffolds containing Macropores by design[J]. Mater Lett, 2020, 263: 127227. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127227 |
[29] | Feng P, Wu P, Gao C D, et al. A multimaterial scaffold with tunable properties: toward bone tissue repair[J]. Adv Sci, 2018, 5(6): 1700817. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700817 |
[30] | Su Y W, He J K, Jiang N, et al. Additively-manufactured poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) lattice scaffolds with uniform microporous architectures for enhanced cellular response and soft tissue adhesion[J]. Mater Des, 2020, 191: 108671. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108671 |
[31] | Deng Y, Shi X Y, Chen Y, et al. Bacteria-triggered pH-responsive osteopotentiating coating on 3D-printed polyetheretherketone scaffolds for infective bone defect repair[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2020, 59(26): 12123-12135. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02107 |
[32] | Zalaznik M, Kalin M, Novak S. Influence of the processing temperature on the tribological and mechanical properties of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer[J]. Tribol Int, 2016, 94: 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.08.016 |
[33] | Yang C C, Tian X Y, Li D C, et al. Influence of thermal processing conditions in 3D printing on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of PEEK material[J]. J Mater Process Technol, 2017, 248: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 |
[34] | Hu B, Duan X B, Xing Z H, et al. Improved design of fused deposition modeling equipment for 3D printing of high-performance PEEK parts[J]. Mech Mater, 2019, 137: 103139. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103139 |
[35] | Zheng J B, Kang J F, Sun C N, et al. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 118: 104475. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104475 |
[36] | Yaragalla S, Zahid M, Panda J K, et al. Comprehensive enhancement in thermomechanical performance of melt-extruded PEEK filaments by Graphene incorporation[J]. Polymers, 2021, 13(9): 1425. doi: 10.3390/polym13091425 |
[37] | Guo Y X, Ji Z Y, Zhang Y, et al. Solvent-free and photocurable polyimide inks for 3D printing[J]. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5(31): 16307-16314. doi: 10.1039/C7TA01952A |
[38] | Hegde M, Meenakshisundaram V, Chartrain N, et al. 3D printing all-aromatic polyimides using mask-projection stereolithography: processing the nonprocessable[J]. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(31): 1701240. doi: 10.1002/adma.201701240 |
[39] | Zhang F, Tuck C, Hague R, et al. Inkjet printing of polyimide insulators for the 3D printing of dielectric materials for microelectronic applications[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 2016, 133(18): 43361. |
[40] | Herzberger J, Meenakshisundaram V, Williams C B, et al. 3D printing all-aromatic polyimides using stereolithographic 3D printing of polyamic acid salts[J]. ACS Macro Lett, 2018, 7(4): 493-497. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00126 |
[41] | Guo Y X, Xu J W, Yan C Y, et al. Direct ink writing of high performance architectured polyimides with low dimensional shrinkage[J]. Adv Eng Mater, 2019, 21(5): 1801314. doi: 10.1002/adem.201801314 |
[42] | Qin S Y, Jiang Y, Ji Z Y, et al. Three-dimensional printing of high-performance polyimide by direct ink writing of hydrogel precursor[J]. J Appl Polym Sci, 2021, 138(27): 50636. doi: 10.1002/app.50636 |
[43] | Wang C Y, Ma S Q, Li D D, et al. 3D printing of lightweight polyimide honeycombs with the high specific strength and temperature resistance[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13(13): 15690-15700. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01992 |
[44] | Jiang S L, Liao G X, Xu D D, et al. Mechanical properties analysis of polyetherimide parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling[J]. High Perform Polym, 2019, 31(1): 97-106. doi: 10.1177/0954008317752822 |
[45] | Wu T, Jiang P, Zhang X Q, et al. Additively manufacturing high-performance bismaleimide architectures with ultraviolet-assisted direct ink writing[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 180: 107947. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107947 |
[46] | Gouzman I, Atar N, Grossman E, et al. 3D printing of bismaleimides: from new ink formulation to printed thermosetting polymer objects[J]. Adv Mater Technol, 2019, 4(10): 1900368. doi: 10.1002/admt.201900368 |
[47] | Gan X P, Wang J Z, Wang Z H, et al. Simultaneous realization of conductive segregation network microstructure and minimal surface porous macrostructure by SLS 3D printing[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 178: 107874. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107874 |
[48] | Sun S J, Gan X P, Wang Z H, et al. Dynamic healable polyurethane for selective laser sintering[J]. Addit Manuf, 2020, 33: 101176. |
[49] | Peng S Q, Li Y W, Wu L X, et al. 3D printing mechanically robust and transparent polyurethane elastomers for stretchable electronic sensors[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(5): 6479-6488. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20631 |
[50] | Joo H, Cho S. Comparative studies on polyurethane composites filled with polyaniline and graphene for DLP-Type 3D printing[J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(1): 67. doi: 10.3390/polym12010067 |
[51] | Gama N, Ferreira A, Barros-Timmons A. 3D printed cork/polyurethane composite foams[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 179: 107905. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107905 |
[52] | Wang R M, Zheng S R, Zheng Y P. 3-Matrix materials[M]//Wang R M, Zheng S R, Zheng Y P. Polymer Matrix Composites and Technology. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2011: 101-548. |
[53] | Hmeidat N S, Kemp J W, Compton B G. High-strength epoxy nanocomposites for 3D printing[J]. Compos Sci Technol, 2018, 160: 9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.008 |
[54] | Lin D, Jin S Y, Zhang F, et al. 3D stereolithography printing of graphene oxide reinforced complex architectures[J]. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26(43): 434003. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/43/434003 |
[55] | Park G T, Lee S J, Kim B G, et al. High thermally conductive epoxy composite inks cured by infrared laser irradiation for two-dimensional/three-dimensional printing technology[J]. J Compos Mater, 2020, 54(29): 4635-4643. doi: 10.1177/0021998320935154 |
[56] | Liu L, Ying G B, Wen D, et al. Aqueous solution-processed MXene (Ti3C2Tx) for non-hydrophilic epoxy resin-based composites with enhanced mechanical and physical properties[J]. Mater Des, 2021, 197: 109276. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109276 |
[57] | Jiang Q X, Zhang H G, Rusakov D, et al. Additive manufactured carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposites for heavy-duty applications[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2021, 3(1): 93-97. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.0c01011 |
[58] | Mei H, Ali Z, Yan Y K, et al. Influence of mixed isotropic fiber angles and hot press on the mechanical properties of 3D printed composites[J]. Addit Manuf, 2019, 27: 150-158. |
[59] | Compton B G, Lewis J A. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites[J]. Adv Mater, 2014, 26(34): 5930-5935. doi: 10.1002/adma.201401804 |
[60] | Griffini G, Invernizzi M, Levi M, et al. 3D-printable CFR polymer composites with dual-cure sequential IPNs[J]. Polymer, 2016, 91: 174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.048 |
[61] | Hao W F, Liu Y, Zhou H, et al. Preparation and characterization of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites[J]. Polym Test, 2018, 65: 29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.11.004 |
[62] | Sano Y, Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, et al. 3D printing of discontinuous and continuous fibre composites using stereolithography[J]. Addit Manuf, 2018, 24: 521-527. |
[63] | Jiang Z R, Erol O, Chatterjee D, et al. Direct ink writing of Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) with tunable mechanical properties[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(31): 28289-28295. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07279 |
[64] | Zhang Y X, Yin M J, Ouyang X, et al. 3D μ-printing of polytetrafluoroethylene microstructures: A route to superhydrophobic surfaces and devices[J]. Appl Mater Today, 2020, 19: 100580. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100580 |
[65] | Wu T, Jiang P, Ji Z Y, et al. 3D printing of high-performance isocyanate ester thermosets[J]. Macromol Mater Eng, 2020, 305: 2000397. doi: 10.1002/mame.202000397 |
[66] | Lu Y, Ng K W J, Chen H, et al. The molecular design of photo-curable and high-strength benzoxazine for 3D printing[J]. Chem Commun, 2021, 57(27): 3375-3378. doi: 10.1039/D0CC07801H |
Overview: Additive manufacturing (AM) is a technology based on the principle of layer-by-layer manufacturing, which can be freely designed. Through point-by-point, line-by-line, and layer-by-layer manufacturing to construct complex parts such as polymers, metals, and ceramics, it is a new type of precise control of the microstructure of printing materials. Manufacturing technology, which reduces the product manufacturing cycle and cost from the design and manufacturing methods, has been rapidly developed and widely used in aerospace, optoelectronic engineering, microelectronics, and other fields. However, the 3D printed polymer complex products lack the strength and functions required by the bearing part, resulting in 3D printing technology and its polymer materials are still in the conceptual prototype and functional design stage. Therefore, this technology has limitations in the manufacturing technology and application fields of complex parts such as heat resistance and high strength. Then, high-performance 3D printing polymer materials with comprehensive properties such as high temperature resistance (> 100 ℃), high mechanical strength, high hardness, and high modulus at the top of the polymer material pyramid is developed to promote the development and application of 3D printing technology. At present, 3D printing technology can achieve complex intelligent finishing high-performance polymer materials including polyimide (PI), polyetherimide (PEI), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), High-performance epoxy, etc.
Because of their rigid molecular structure, crystallinity, and molecular weight, these high-performance polymers endow them with extremely high heat resistance, high hardness, high mechanical properties, and high modulus, which cannot achieced by traditional processing methods. 3D printing can achieve high-precision, high-complexity, lightweight and miniaturized manufacturing and application of key components. The 3D printing manufacturing technology has "controllability" and the ability to directly form high-precision complex parts in one step, and has the advantages of short molding time, simplified molding equipment, material distribution on demand, and freedom of part design in the manufacture and application of high-precision, high-complexity, miniaturization and lightweight terminal parts. In addition, how to realize the 3D printing preparation and manufacturing of ultra-high-performance polymers has always been a research hotspot in this field and a problem need to be solved. Therefore, with regard to the current polymer 3D printing and application research, this article focuses on the polymer 3D printing technology and the 3D printing research and application of various high-performance polymer materials, and the preparation and application of 3D printing high-performance polymer materials. The development has been prospected, so as to provide new directions and ideas for the research, application and development of 3D printing high-performance polymer (HPP) materials.
Schematic diagram of additive manufacturing technology. (a) Fused deposition modeling (FDM)[12]; (b) Direct ink writing (DIW)[17]; (c) Stereo lithography (SLA)[23]; (d) Digital light processing technology (DLP)[23]; (e) Continuous liquid interface production technology (CLIP)[25]; (f) Selective laser sintering (SLS)[12]
(a) FFF printing and manufacturing mechanism of PEEK microporous lattice scaffold[30]; (b) pH triggers the 3D printing manufacturing mechanism of the bone-promoting 3P-Ag-AP-PEEK scaffold[31]; (c) 3D printing to manufacture implantable bones with different crystallinity[33]; (d) Improve the PEEK parts formed by the high temperature FDM 3D printing system[34]
(a) The oil filter is printed by stereo lithography (SLA) technology and thermally cured at 300 ℃ [37]; (b) DIW technology has produced complex truss structures including PAA salt solution[39-40]
(a) Schematic diagram of UV-assisted DIW 3D printing BMI resin[45]; (b) Inkjet 3D printing low viscosity BMI complex structure display[46]
(a) Piezoresistive strain sensor and wearable finger protection sensor[49]; (b) DLP printing PU composite parts with different shapes[50]; (c) Schematic diagram of 3D printed cork particle reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) composites[51]
(a) Schematic diagram of a rectangular sample printed with direct ink and optical micrographs of the horizontally flexed sample printed with a 12.5% by weight nanoclay ink formulation[53]; (b) 3D printing of GO reinforced polymer and compression test of its parts[54]; (c) Schematic diagram of UV-3D printing equipment and its printed sample structure[60]
(a) Schematic diagram of the molecular structure and printing process of PTFE ink[63]; (b) Schematic diagram of 3D printing process and the printed PTFE microstructure image[64]