Citation: | Tang YT, Hu ZX, Deng JH et al. Sequential harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum generation in nonlinear optical crystals. Opto-Electron Adv 7, 240138 (2024). doi: 10.29026/oea.2024.240138 |
[1] | Allen L, Beijersbergen MW, Spreeuw RJC et al. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys Rev A 45, 8185–8189 (1992). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 |
[2] | Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt Lett 19, 780–782 (1994). doi: 10.1364/OL.19.000780 |
[3] | Fürhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S et al. Spiral phase contrast imaging in microscopy. Opt Express 13, 689–694 (2005). doi: 10.1364/OPEX.13.000689 |
[4] | He H, Friese MEJ, Heckenberg NR et al. Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity. Phys Rev Lett 75, 826–829 (1995). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.826 |
[5] | Paterson L, MacDonald MP, Arlt J et al. Controlled rotation of optically trapped microscopic particles. Science 292, 912–914 (2001). doi: 10.1126/science.1058591 |
[6] | Grier DG. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 424, 810–816 (2003). doi: 10.1038/nature01935 |
[7] | Wang J, Yang JY, Fazal IM et al. Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat Photonics 6, 488–496 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 |
[8] | Tan HY, Deng JH, Zhao RZ et al. A Free-space orbital angular momentum multiplexing communication system based on a metasurface. Laser Photonics Rev 13, 1800278 (2019). doi: 10.1002/lpor.201800278 |
[9] | Ouyang X, Xu Y, Xian MC et al. Synthetic helical dichroism for six-dimensional optical orbital angular momentum multiplexing. Nat Photonics 15, 901–907 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00880-1 |
[10] | Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G et al. Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons. Nature 412, 313–316 (2001). doi: 10.1038/35085529 |
[11] | Wang XL, Cai XD, Su ZE et al. Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature 518, 516–519 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nature14246 |
[12] | Stav T, Faerman A, Maguid E et al. Quantum entanglement of the spin and orbital angular momentum of photons using metamaterials. Science 361, 1101–1104 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aat9042 |
[13] | Turnbull GA, Robertson DA, Smith GM et al. The generation of free-space Laguerre-Gaussian modes at millimetre-wave frequencies by use of a spiral phaseplate. Opt Commun 127, 183–188 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0030-4018(96)00070-3 |
[14] | Oemrawsingh SSR, van Houwelingen JAW, Eliel ER et al. Production and characterization of spiral phase plates for optical wavelengths. Appl Opt 43, 688–694 (2004). doi: 10.1364/AO.43.000688 |
[15] | Marrucci L, Manzo C, Paparo D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media. Phys Rev Lett 96, 163905 (2006). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 |
[16] | Boruah BR. Dynamic manipulation of a laser beam using a liquid crystal spatial light modulator. Am J Phys 77, 331–336 (2009). doi: 10.1119/1.3054349 |
[17] | Forbes A, Dudley A, McLaren M. Creation and detection of optical modes with spatial light modulators. Adv Opt Photonics 8, 200–227 (2016). doi: 10.1364/AOP.8.000200 |
[18] | Yu NF, Genevet P, Kats MA et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337 (2011). doi: 10.1126/science.1210713 |
[19] | Pu MB, Li X, Ma XL et al. Catenary optics for achromatic generation of perfect optical angular momentum. Sci Adv 1, e1500396 (2015). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500396 |
[20] | Xie X, Pu MB, Jin JJ et al. Generalized Pancharatnam-Berry phase in rotationally symmetric meta-atoms. Phys Rev Lett 126, 183902 (2021). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.183902 |
[21] | Guo YH, Zhang SC, Pu MB et al. Spin-decoupled metasurface for simultaneous detection of spin and orbital angular momenta via momentum transformation. Light Sci Appl 10, 63 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00497-7 |
[22] | Wang B, Liu WZ, Zhao MX et al. Generating optical vortex beams by momentum-space polarization vortices centred at bound states in the continuum. Nat Photonics 14, 623–628 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0658-1 |
[23] | Gao XM, Yang LC, Lin H et al. Dirac-vortex topological cavities. Nat Nanotechnol 15, 1012–1018 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0773-7 |
[24] | Huang C, Zhang C, Xiao SM et al. Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers. Science 367, 1018–1021 (2020). doi: 10.1126/science.aba4597 |
[25] | Bliokh KY, Rodríguez-Fortuño FJ, Nori F et al. Spin–orbit interactions of light. Nat Photonics 9, 796–808 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 |
[26] | Cardano F, Marrucci L. Spin–orbit photonics. Nat Photonics 9, 776–778 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.232 |
[27] | Devlin RC, Ambrosio A, Rubin NA et al. Arbitrary spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion of light. Science 358, 896–901 (2017). doi: 10.1126/science.aao5392 |
[28] | Ciattoni A, Cincotti G, Palma C. Circularly polarized beams and vortex generation in uniaxial media. J Opt Soc Am A 20, 163–171 (2003). doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.20.000163 |
[29] | Brasselet E, Izdebskaya Y, Shvedov V et al. Dynamics of optical spin-orbit coupling in uniaxial crystals. Opt Lett 34, 1021–1023 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OL.34.001021 |
[30] | Forbes A, de Oliveira M, Dennis MR. Structured light. Nat Photonics 15, 253–262 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4 |
[31] | Buono WT, Forbes A. Nonlinear optics with structured light. Opto-Electron Adv 5, 210174 (2022). doi: 10.29026/oea.2022.210174 |
[32] | Gui G, Brooks NJ, Kapteyn HC et al. Second-harmonic generation and the conservation of spatiotemporal orbital angular momentum of light. Nat Photonics 15, 608–613 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00841-8 |
[33] | Zdagkas A, McDonnell C, Deng JH et al. Observation of toroidal pulses of light. Nat Photonics 16, 523–528 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41566-022-01028-5 |
[34] | Dholakia K, Simpson NB, Padgett MJ et al. Second-harmonic generation and the orbital angular momentum of light. Phys Rev A 54, R3742–R3745 (1996). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R3742 |
[35] | Li GX, Wu L, Li KF et al. Nonlinear metasurface for simultaneous control of spin and orbital angular momentum in second harmonic generation. Nano Lett 17, 7974–7979 (2017). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04451 |
[36] | Wang L, Kruk S, Koshelev K et al. Nonlinear wavefront control with all-dielectric metasurfaces. Nano Lett 18, 3978–3984 (2018). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01460 |
[37] | Chen SM, Li KF, Deng JH et al. High-order nonlinear spin–orbit interaction on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett 20, 8549–8555 (2020). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03100 |
[38] | Liu S, Switkowski K, Xu CL et al. Nonlinear wavefront shaping with optically induced three-dimensional nonlinear photonic crystals. Nat Commun 10, 3208 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11114-y |
[39] | Wei DZ, Wang CW, Xu XY et al. Efficient nonlinear beam shaping in three-dimensional lithium niobate nonlinear photonic crystals. Nat Commun 10, 4193 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12251-0 |
[40] | Shen YJ, Wang XJ, Xie ZW et al. Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light Sci Appl 8, 90 (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 |
[41] | Erhard M, Krenn M, Zeilinger A. Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement. Nat Rev Phys 2, 365–381 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s42254-020-0193-5 |
[42] | He C, Shen YJ, Forbes A. Towards higher-dimensional structured light. Light Sci Appl 11, 205 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00897-3 |
[43] | Chong A, Wan CH, Chen J et al. Generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable transverse orbital angular momentum. Nat Photonics 14, 350–354 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0587-z |
[44] | Wang K, Titchener JG, Kruk SS et al. Quantum metasurface for multiphoton interference and state reconstruction. Science 361, 1104–1108 (2018). doi: 10.1126/science.aat8196 |
[45] | Tang YT, Li KF, Zhang XC et al. Harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum cascade in nonlinear optical crystals. Nat Photonics 14, 658–662 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0691-0 |
[46] | Chen CT, Wu BC, Jiang AD et al. A new-type ultraviolet SHG crystal: β-BaB2O4. Sci Sin Ser B 28, 235–243 (1985). |
[47] | Bhagavantam S, Chandrasekhar P. Harmonic generation and selection rules in nonlinear optics. Proc Indian Acad Sci Sect A 76, 13–20 (1972). doi: 10.1007/BF03048332 |
[48] | Chen SM, Li GX, Zeuner F et al. Symmetry-selective third-harmonic generation from plasmonic metacrystals. Phys Rev Lett 113, 033901 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.033901 |
[49] | Konishi K, Higuchi T, Li J et al. Polarization-controlled circular second-harmonic generation from metal hole arrays with threefold rotational symmetry. Phys Rev Lett 112, 135502 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.135502 |
[50] | Li GX, Chen SM, Pholchai N et al. Continuous control of the nonlinearity phase for harmonic generations. Nat Mater 14, 607–612 (2015). doi: 10.1038/nmat4267 |
[51] | Denisenko V, Shvedov V, Desyatnikov AS et al. Determination of topological charges of polychromatic optical vortices. Opt Express 17, 23374–23379 (2009). doi: 10.1364/OE.17.023374 |
[52] | Wu YK, Tang YT, Hu ZX et al. Optical spin–orbit interaction in spontaneous parametric downconversion. Optica 10, 538–543 (2023). doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.487001 |
Supplementary information for Sequential harmonic spin–orbit angular momentum generation in nonlinear optical crystals |
Generation of second harmonic waves (SHWs) with multiple angular momentum states through sequential optical spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) in two BBO crystals with threefold rotational symmetry. For a circularly polarized fundamental wave (FW) with angular momentum state of
The linear and nonlinear optical spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) in one BBO crystal. (a) Schematic diagram of the linear and nonlinear optical SOI processes in one BBO crystal. The BBO crystal with threefold rotational symmetry is placed at the center of a pair of 10× objective lenses to enhance the SOI effect. For a fundamental wave (FW) with angular momentum state of (σ, ℓ)FW, the two output states of the SHWs come from the Direct and SOI channels are (−σ, 2ℓ)SH and (σ, 2ℓ − 2σ)SH, respectively. (b–e) Circular polarization resolved intensity profiles of the FWs (λ = 800 nm) after the BBO crystal. The incident FW is left- or right- circularly polarized (L/R) and the images for the L/R components of the output FWs are experimentally recorded. For each circular polarization combination, two images of the FWs are recorded by using a spherical lens (left panel) and a cylindrical lens (right panel). The dark core of the intensity profile imaged through the spherical lens is the typical characteristic of a vortex beam, and the value of the topological charge is revealed by the dark fringes in the one imaged via the cylindrical lens. (f–i) Circular polarization resolved intensity profiles of the second harmonic waves (λ = 400 nm) generated in the BBO crystal are also recorded. It should be noted that the SHWs measured here mainly come from the Direct FW channel, as that of the SOI-induced FW channel are very weak. The color of the SHW images is converted from the original blue to cyan for better visualization of the intensity patterns.
The sequential optical spin–orbit interaction process of the fundamental waves (FWs) in the double BBO crystal system. (a) Schematic illustration of the double BBO crystal system which consists of two confocal optical sections. Each section includes a pair of 10× OLs (objective lenses) and a BBO crystal. LP (linear polarizer) and QWP (quarter-wave plate) are used to generate or analyze the circularly polarized FWs and second harmonic waves (SHWs). The combination of QWP2, LP2 and QWP3 is used to prepare the specific circular polarization component of the outgoing FWs from the first crystal (BBO1). LPF, long-pass filter, which is used to block the SHWs generated in BBO1. QWP4 and LP3 are used to analyze the circular polarization states of the SHWs generated in the second crystal (BBO2). L5, tube lens (spherical or cylindrical lens). (b–q) Intensity profiles of the FWs behind BBO2. The polarization labels above the results correspond to the sixteen combinations of the circular polarization states (L/R) of the FWs at the positions marked as POS-1 to POS-4 in (a). Compared to the results in (b) to (i), the ones in (j) to (q) are obtained under the conditions that the spin angular momentum states of the FWs between POS-2 and POS-3 are flipped from LCP to RCP, or from RCP to LCP by rotating the fast axis direction of QWP3.
Angular momentum states of the second harmonic waves (SHWs) through the sequential spin–orbit interactions (SOIs) in the double BBO crystal system. The experimental setup is the same as the one shown in Fig. 3(a). (a–p) Sixteen cases correspond to full combinations of the circular polarization states of the fundamental waves (FWs) that are incident on and after BBO1, before BBO2 and that of the SHWs after BBO2 (corresponding positions are marked as POS-1 to POS-4 in Fig. 3(a)). When the angular momentum state of the input FW is LCP and Gaussian, i.e. (1, 0)FW, the double crystal system can generate eight angular momentum states of the SHWs, as revealed in (a) to (d) and (i) to (l). The energies of the eight states are nearly the same as each other. While in (a) to (h) the spin angular momentum states of the FWs are kept unchanged, they are flipped from LCP to RCP, or from RCP to LCP in (i) to (p), which is realized by rotating the fast axis direction of QWP3. (q, r) The normalized relative power distributions of the angular momentum states of SHWs, where (q) and (r) correspond to the cases for input FW states of (1, 0)FW and (−1, 0)FW, respectively. SAM, spin angular momentum; OAM, orbital angular momentum.