Citation: |
|
[1] | 周春平, 宫辉力. 实用卫星遥感超分辨率理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016: 6. Zhou C P, Gong H L. Theory and Application of Superresolution for Practical Satellite Remote Sensing[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016: 6. |
[2] | 赵圆圆, 施圣贤. 融合多尺度特征的光场图像超分辨率方法[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(12): 54–64. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200007 Zhao Y Y, Shi S X. Light-field image super-resolution based on multi-scale feature fusion[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2020, 47(12): 54–64. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200007 |
[3] | 于淑侠, 胡良梅, 张旭东, 等. 彩色图像多尺度引导的深度图像超分辨率重建[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(4): 42–51. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.190260 Yu S X, Hu L M, Zhang X D, et al. Multi-scale guided depth image super-resolution reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2020, 47(4): 42–51. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.190260 |
[4] | 朱福珍, 刘越, 黄鑫, 等. 改进的稀疏表示遥感图像超分辨重建[J]. 光学精密工程, 2019, 27(3): 718–725. Zhu F Z, Liu Y, Huang X, et al. Remote sensing image super-resolution based on improved sparse representation[J]. Opt Precis Eng, 2019, 27(3): 718–725. |
[5] | Fu B, Li Y, Wang X H, et al. Image super-resolution using TV priori guided convolutional network[J]. Patt Recognit Lett, 2019, 125: 780–784. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2019.06.022 |
[6] | Xu T, Huang T Z, Deng L J, et al. Hyperspectral image superresolution using unidirectional total variation with tucker decomposition[J]. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observat Remote Sens, 2020, 13: 4381–4398. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3012566 |
[7] | Farsiu S, Robinson M D, Elad M, et al. Fast and robust multiframe super resolution[J]. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2004, 13(10): 1327–1344. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2004.834669 |
[8] | 代少升, 崔俊杰, 张德洲. 基于自适应阈值HMRF的红外超分辨率重建[J]. 半导体光电, 2017, 38(4): 577–579, 613. Dai S S, Cui J J, Zhang D Z. Infrared super-resolution reconstruction based on adaptive threshold HMRF[J]. Semicond Optoelectr, 2017, 38(4): 577–579, 613. |
[9] | Rezayi H, Seyedin S A. Huber Markov random field for joint super resolution[C]//2017 10th Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP), Isfahan, Iran, 2017: 93–98. |
[10] | Shao Z F, Wang L, Wang Z Y, Deng J. Remote sensing image super-resolution using sparse representation and coupled sparse autoencoder[J]. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observat Remote Sens, 2019, 12(8): 2663–2674. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2925456 |
[11] | Li J, Zhou T, Wang W X, et al. Enhancement method for aviation image based on improved NSCT[C]//2020 Cross Strait Radio Science & Wireless Technology Conference (CSRSWTC), Fuzhou, China, 2020: 1–3. |
[12] | Li F, Xin L, Guo Y, et al. A framework of mixed sparse representations for remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2017, 55(2): 1210–1221. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2621123 |
[13] | 鲍东星, 李晓明, 李金. 基于洛伦兹范数的医学图像超分辨率重建研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2020, 37(4): 205–208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2020.04.043 Bao D X, Li X M, Li J. Lorentzian norm based super-resolution reconstruction of medical image[J]. Comput Simul, 2020, 37(4): 205–208. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2020.04.043 |
[14] | 孙超. 基于混合方法的卫星遥感图像自动配准技术的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018. Sun C. The research on automatic registration technology of satellite remote sensing images based on hybrid methods[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2018. |
[15] | Liu L, Huang W, Wang C, et al. SAR image super-resolution based on TV-regularization using gradient profile prior[C]//2016 CIE International Conference on Radar (RADAR), Guangzhou, China, 2016: 1–4. |
[16] | 李志明. 基于L1范数的全变分正则化超分辨重构算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2016, 52(15): 212–216. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1511-0286 Li Z M. Super resolution reconstruction algorithm based on L1 norm of total variation regularization[J]. Comput Eng Appl, 2016, 52(15): 212–216. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1511-0286 |
[17] | 薛翠红, 于明, 杨宇皓, 等. 基于学习的马尔科夫超分辨率复原[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(S1): 406–409. Xue C H, Yu M, Yang Y H, et al. MRF reconstruction based on the markov network[J]. J Jilin Univ (Eng Ed), 2013, 43(S1): 406–409. |
[18] | Liu X H, Tanaka M, Okutomi M. Noise level estimation using weak textured patches of a single noisy image[C]//2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Orlando, FL, USA, 2013. |
Overview: The optimization function of a super-resolution algorithm consists of two parts: a data consistency term that is dependent on input images and a prior term that is derived from a prior model. The data consistency term introduces non-redundant information between images, but it also exacerbates the noise and causes overfitting. Therefore, the selection of the prior model is crucial for optimizing the performance of the image reconstruction. In order to obtain a higher confidence super-resolution prior model and balance the reconstructed results between noise and details, this paper establishes a Gauss-Lorenz hybrid prior model based on the mixed sparse representation framework. This prior model's advantages and specific application scheme are studied. Firstly, according to the type of prior information, the advantages and problems of some traditional algorithms are introduced. Next, the statistical characteristics of different components of the image are modeled separately. Then, based on the analysis the mixed sparse framework, the Gauss-Gibbs prior and the Lorenz prior, the super-resolution algorithm based on the Gauss-Lorenz hybrid prior under the group sparse framework is illustrated. Finally, the implementation and the final iteration scheme are introduced. The aim of noise suppression while maintaining details in the reconstruction process has been completed, which can be used for more complex environments with super-resolution reconstruction requirements. This paper has three main innovations. 1) We use the group sparse framework as the basic framework of the prior model. In this paper, different components of the natural images are projected into spatial, wavelet, and curved domains respectively. The image is divided into three components: point, line, and surface. We get constraints that are closer to natural images and improve the prior confidence. 2) Line component, that is, the edge component of an image, is closer to Lorenz distribution in statistical derivation than Gaussian distribution, so Lorenz model is used to model the edge component in the curved domain; Gaussian-Gibbs model is used to model the point and area components, which can suppress noise. The three components are continuously and alternately optimized in iteration to achieve a balance. 3) The pixel residuals threshold in the convex set projection iteration method is used as the iteration termination condition to solve the problem that the optimization progress and the optimization step are not uniform in different domains. We use four detection methods: structural similarity, maximum absolute error, noise level detection and peak signal-to-noise ratio to evaluate the results of the algorithm. Whether it is the evaluation method with or without reference, the algorithm proposed in this paper obtains better evaluation results than other algorithms.
Lorenz curve
Image component decomposition.
Reconstruction results of Zelda sequence.
Reconstruction results of Man sequence.
Reconstruction results of Cameraman sequence.
Reconstruction results of coco sequence.
Reconstruction results of house sequence.