Wang Y, Bian Q H, Liao J, et al. Strapdown inertial stabilization technology based on SBG inertial navigation in inertial stabilization gimbal[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2023, 50(5): 220238. doi: 10.12086/oee.2023.220238
Citation: Wang Y, Bian Q H, Liao J, et al. Strapdown inertial stabilization technology based on SBG inertial navigation in inertial stabilization gimbal[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2023, 50(5): 220238. doi: 10.12086/oee.2023.220238

Strapdown inertial stabilization technology based on SBG inertial navigation in inertial stabilization gimbal

    Fund Project: Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2021JDJQ0028)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: tangtao24@163.com
  • The lightweight SBG inertial navigation system has the characteristics of being small and light, which can be used for the direct and strapdown stabilization of the electro-optical tracking system. In this paper, five inertial stabilization control methods based on the lightweight SBG navigation system in gimbals are studied, and theoretical analysis and experimental validation are performed. The classical position strapdown stabilization technique has limited disturbance suppression capability due to the limitation of position bandwidth, which makes it difficult to meet the requirement of high-precision stabilization. A SBG-based position-rate dual strapdown feedforward stabilization method is proposed, and the decoupling of the strapdown feedforward is achieved by introducing a high-pass filter, which can further improve the perturbation rejection bandwidth as well as the stabilization capability of the system. Theoretical analysis and experimental results show that the SBG-based gyro direct stabilization control method is better at disturbance suppression when the application conditions are not considered, although it is limited by the bandwidth. Under the limitations of platform volume and weight, the proposed SBG-based dual disturbance strapdown stabilization can further improve the system's disturbance rejection capability and obtain better stabilization accuracy.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Yu Z Y, Yang T, Ruan Y, et al. A rate-difference disturbance observer control for a timing-belt servo system[J]. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2022, 69(1): 11458−11467. doi: 10.1109/tie.2021.3123642

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Hurák Z, Rezac M. Image-based pointing and tracking for inertially stabilized airborne camera platform[J]. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2012, 20(5): 1146−1159. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2011.2164541

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Ruan Y, Xu T R, Liu Y, et al. Error-based observation control of an image-based control loop for disturbance suppression in segmented lightweight large-scaled diffractive telescope (SLLDT)[J]. Opt Lasers Eng, 2022, 156: 107105. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107105

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 唐涛, 马佳光, 陈洪斌, 等. 光电跟踪系统中精密控制技术研究进展[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(10): 200315. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200315

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Tang T, Ma J G, Chen H B, et al. A review on precision control methodologies for optical-electric tracking control system[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2020, 47(10): 200315. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200315

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 李志俊, 毛耀, 亓波, 等. 量子光通信中位置修正单检测控制方法[J]. 光电工程, 2022, 49(3): 210311. doi: 10.12086/oee.2022.210311

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Li Z J, Mao Y, Qi B, et al. Research on control technology of single detection based on position correction in quantum optical communication[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2022, 49(3): 210311. doi: 10.12086/oee.2022.210311

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Hilkert J M. Inertially stabilized platform technology concepts and principles[J]. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 2008, 28(1): 26−46. doi: 10.1109/MCS.2007.910256

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 张良总, 杨涛, 吴云, 等. 基于图像测量的Stewart平台双阶控制技术[J]. 光电工程, 2022, 49(8): 220019. doi: 10.12086/oee.2022.220019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Zhang L Z, Yang T, Wu Y, et al. Image measurement-based two-stage control of Stewart platform[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2022, 49(8): 220019. doi: 10.12086/oee.2022.220019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 田竞. 惯性稳定平台中的多传感器控制技术研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    Tian J. Research on multiple sensors control technology of inertial stabled-platforms[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2016.

    Google Scholar

    [9] Glück M, Pott J U, Sawodny O. Investigations of an accelerometer-based disturbance feedforward control for vibration suppression in adaptive optics of large telescopes[J]. Publ Astron Soc Pac, 2017, 129(976): 065001. doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa632b

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] El-Sheimy N, Youssef A. Inertial sensors technologies for navigation applications: state of the art and future trends[J]. Satell Navig, 2020, 1(1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s43020-019-0001-5

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 夏文强, 何秋农, 段倩文, 等. 基于传感器优化与鲁棒预测的等效加速度前馈[J]. 光电工程, 2021, 48(11): 210153. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210153

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Xia W Q, He Q N, Duan Q W, et al. Equivalent acceleration feedforward based on sensor optimization and robust prediction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(11): 210153. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210153

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Řezáč M, Hurák Z. Vibration rejection for inertially stabilized double gimbal platform using acceleration feedforward[C]//2011 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2011: 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.2011.6044442.

    Google Scholar

    [13] Li M, Li J, Zhang R Q. Unbalance disturbance restraining for inertial stabilized platform[C]//2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2016: 2723–2728. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2016.7531444.

    Google Scholar

    [14] Xia Y Z, Bao Q L, Liu Z D. A new disturbance feedforward control method for electro-optical tracking system line-of-sight stabilization on moving platform[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(12): 4350. doi: 10.3390/s18124350

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Kennedy P J, Kennedy R L. Direct versus indirect line of sight (LOS) stabilization[J]. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol, 2003, 11(1): 3−15. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2002.806443

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Sisu S, Şuvak Ö. Comparison of direct and indirect stabilization methods for gyro stabilized gimbal systems[C]//2020 12th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2020: 251–255.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Chen Y, Xue Y Y, Zhang X J, et al. Target tracking system based on inertial stabilized platform[J]. Appl Mech Mater, 2012, 271–272: 1669−1674. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.271-272.1669

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Zubov A V. Stabilization of program motion and kinematic trajectories in dynamic systems in case of systems of direct and indirect control[J]. Autom Remote Control, 2007, 68(3): 386−398. doi: 10.1134/S0005117907030022

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Inertial sensors are often used to maintain inertial stabilization and compensate disturbance in moving platform gimbal systems, which are widely used in engineering applications such as vehicles, satellites, ground-based equipment, and other moving platforms. Maintaining the line of sight (LOS) toward a target is challenging when the gimbal systems work in an environment with severe disturbance or when the target is highly dynamic. According to the installation methods of the sensors, the control methods can be divided into two types: direct stabilization and strapdown inertial stabilization. In direct stabilization method, the inertial sensors are directly mounted on the LOS axes to compensate the disturbance, which is simple to achieve but the disturbance suppression capability is limited by the closed-loop bandwidth of the system. However, the closed-loop bandwidth of the system is limited by the resonant frequency of the platform, which is difficult to improve, resulting in limited system disturbance surpression capability. The lightweight SBG inertial navigation system, produced by SBG Systems company, has the characteristics of being small and lightweight, which can be used for the direct and strapdown stabilization of the electro-optical tracking system. In this paper, five inertial stabilization control methods based on lightweight SBG navigation system in gimbals are studied, and theoretical analysis and experimental validation are performed. The classical position strapdown stabilization technique has limited disturbance suppression capability due to the limitation of position bandwidth, which makes it difficult to meet the requirement of high-precision stabilization. A SBG-based position-rate dual strapdown feedforward stabilization method is proposed, and the decoupling of the strapdown feedforward is achieved by introducing a high-pass filter, which can further improve the perturbation rejection bandwidth as well as the stabilization capability of the system. Theoretical analysis and experimental results show that the SBG-based gyro direct stabilization control method is better at disturbance suppression when the application conditions are not considered, although it is limited by the bandwidth. Under the limitations of platform volume and weight, the proposed SBG-based dual disturbance strapdown stabilization can further improve the system's disturbance rejection capability and obtain better stabilization accuracy.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(13)

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(5043) PDF downloads(680) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint