Citation: | Qi Z W, Kong H H, Li J X, et al. Overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of sparse angle CT reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2023, 50(10): 230167. doi: 10.12086/oee.2023.230167 |
[1] | Jouini M S, Keskes N. Numerical estimation of rock properties and textural facies classification of core samples using X-ray computed tomography images[J]. Appl Math Modell, 2017, 41: 562−581. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.09.021 |
[2] | Brenner D J, Hall E J. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(22): 2277−2284. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149 |
[3] | Wang G, Yu H Y, Ye Y B. A scheme for multisource interior tomography[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(8): 3575−3581. doi: 10.1118/1.3157103 |
[4] | Xu Q, Yu H Y, Mou X Q, et al. Low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction via dictionary learning[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2012, 31(9): 1682−1697. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2195669 |
[5] | Yu W, Wang C X, Nie X Y, et al. Image reconstruction for few-view computed tomography based on ℓ0 sparse regularization[J]. Procedia Comput Sci, 2017, 107: 808−813. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.178 |
[6] | Donoho D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289−1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582 |
[7] | Zhang W K, Zhang H M, Wang L Y, et al. Limited angle CT reconstruction by simultaneous spatial and radon domain regularization based on TV and data-driven tight frame[J]. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A:Accel, Spectrom, Detect Assoc Equip, 2018, 880: 107−117. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.10.056 |
[8] | Miao J Y, Cao H L, Jin X B, et al. Joint sparse regularization for dictionary learning[J]. Cogn Comput, 2019, 11(5): 697−710. doi: 10.1007/s12559-019-09650-2 |
[9] | Li M, Fan Z T, Ji H, et al. Wavelet frame based algorithm for 3D reconstruction in electron microscopy[J]. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2014, 36(1): B45−B69. doi: 10.1137/130914474 |
[10] | Wang Y L, Yang J F, Yin W T, et al. A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction[J]. SIAM J Imaging Sci, 2008, 1(3): 248−272. doi: 10.1137/080724265 |
[11] | Sidky E Y, Kao C M, Pan X C. Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT[J]. J X-Ray Sci Technol, 2006, 14(2): 119−139. |
[12] | Zhang X F, Liu H B. Linear programming-based reconstruction algorithm for limited angular sparse-view tomography[J]. Opt Lasers Eng, 2021, 140: 106524. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106524 |
[13] | 连祥媛, 孔慧华, 潘晋孝, 等. 多通道联合的广义总变分能谱CT重建[J]. 光电工程, 2021, 48(9): 210211. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210211 Lian X Y, Kong H H, Pan J X, et al. Joint multi-channel total generalized variational algorithm for spectral CT reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(9): 210211. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210211 |
[14] | Bao P, Zhou J L, Zhang Y. Few-view CT reconstruction with group-sparsity regularization[J]. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng, 2018, 34(9): e3101. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3101 |
[15] | Jon K, Sun Y, Li Q X, et al. Image restoration using overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of image gradient[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 420: 57−69. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.08.053 |
[16] | Liu J, Huang T Z, Selesnick I W, et al. Image restoration using total variation with overlapping group sparsity[J]. Inform Sci, 2015, 295: 232−246. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.041 |
[17] | Kong J, Lu K S, Jiang M. A new blind deblurring method via Hyper-Laplacian prior[J]. Procedia Comput Sci, 2017, 107: 789−795. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.170 |
[18] | Boyd S P, Parikh N, Chu E, et al. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers[J]. Found Trends Mach Learn, 2011, 3(1): 1−122. |
[19] | Hunter D R, Lange K. A tutorial on MM algorithms[J]. Am Stat, 2004, 58(1): 30−37. doi: 10.1198/0003130042836 |
[20] | Kong H H, Liu R, Yu H Y. Ordered-subset split-Bregman algorithm for interior tomography[J]. J X-Ray Sci Technol, 2016, 24(2): 221−240. doi: 10.3233/XST-160547 |
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is an imaging technique to obtain the across section information of an object through X-ray projection measurement at different angles, which has been widely used in industry, clinical diagnosis and other fields. However, additional X-ray radiation during clinical examination can lead to cancer and other genetic changes. In order to reduce the dose of X-ray radiation, sparse angle projection is used to add the scanning interval and reduce the number of projection times, and a small amount of projection data is used to achieve image reconstruction. However, this method will reduce the quality of the reconstructed image, there will be more artifacts and noise, and it is difficult to meet the requirements of industrial and medical diagnosis. In order to improve the quality of reconstructed images under sparse sampling, a sparse angle CT reconstruction algorithm based on overlapping group sparsity and hyper-Laplacian prior is proposed in this paper. The sparse regular term of the overlapping group improves the sparsity of the image gradient. The structure information of the image gradient is used as the measurement standard of the image gradient sparsity, which fully considers the gradient information of the pixel neighborhood, and regroups the gradient information by two norms to increase the difference between the smooth region and the image edge region. Since the gradient of the image basically follows the heavy-tailed distribution, the hyper-Laplacian prior can accurately approximate the heavy tail distribute-on of the image gradient, this regular term can suppress the noise generated in the reconstruction process. Combining the advantages of the two regular terms, the algorithm can effectively overcome the staircase artifacts while recovering the edge of the image, and remove the noise generated in the reconstruction. In this paper, alternate direction multiplier method, principal component minimization method and gradient descent method are used to solve the objective function. The experimental data of the simulated mouse model and the clinical mouse model were used in this study. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) and structural similarity index (SSIM) were used as indicators to evaluate different algorithms, and regions of interest were added to compare the reconstructed images, so that the differences of different algorithms could be more clearly seen from the structural details of the mouse model. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has some improvements in preserving the details of image structure and suppressing noise and staircase artifacts in the process of image reconstruction.
The simulated mouse thorax phantom and the iodine contrast agent
The reconstruction results of the simulated mouse model: (a) FBP; (b) SART; (c) TV; (d) TGV; (e) OGS-TV; (f) OGS-HL. From top to bottom, the reconstructed images are from 60, 90, 120 and 180
The reconstruction results of the simulated mouse model: (a) FBP; (b) SART; (c) TV; (d) TGV; (e) OGS-TV; (f) OGS-HL. From top to bottom, the ROI regions are 60, 90, 120 and 180
Three quantitative evaluation indexes of the reconstruction effect of the simulated mouse model: (a) NRMSE; (b) PSNR; (c) SSIM. From top to bottom, the quantitative evaluation indexes of the reconstructed images from 60, 90, 120 and 180
The reconstruction results of the clinical mouse model: (a) FBP; (b) SART; (c) TV; (d) TGV; (e) OGS-TV; (f) OGS-HL. From top to bottom, the reconstructed images are from 60, 90, 120 and 180
The reconstruction results of the clinical mouse model: (a) FBP; (b) SART; (c) TV; (d) TGV; (e) OGS-TV; (f) OGS-HL. From top to bottom, the ROI regions are 60, 90, 120, and 180