Qi Z W, Kong H H, Li J X, et al. Overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of sparse angle CT reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2023, 50(10): 230167. doi: 10.12086/oee.2023.230167
Citation: Qi Z W, Kong H H, Li J X, et al. Overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of sparse angle CT reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2023, 50(10): 230167. doi: 10.12086/oee.2023.230167

Overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of sparse angle CT reconstruction

    Fund Project: Project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62201520, 62103384, 62122070), and Basic Research Project of Shanxi Province Fund (202103021224190)
More Information
  • For the sparse angle projection data, the problem of artifact and noise is easy to appear in the image reconstruction of computed tomography, which is difficult to meet the requirements of industrial and medical diagnosis. In this paper, a sparse angle CT iterative reconstruction algorithm based on overlapping group sparsity and hyper-Laplacian prior is proposed. The overlapping group sparsity reflects the sparsity of image gradient, and the overlapping cross relation between the adjacent elements is considered from the perspective of the image gradient. The hyper-Laplacian prior can accurately approximate the heavy-tailed distribution of the image gradient and improve the overall quality of the reconstructed image. The algorithm model proposed in this paper uses alternating direction multiplier method, principal component minimization method and gradient descent method to solve the objective function. The experimental results show that under the condition of the sparse angle CT reconstruction, the proposed algorithm has certain improvement in preserving structural details and suppressing noise and staircase artifacts generated in the process of image reconstruction.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Jouini M S, Keskes N. Numerical estimation of rock properties and textural facies classification of core samples using X-ray computed tomography images[J]. Appl Math Modell, 2017, 41: 562−581. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.09.021

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Brenner D J, Hall E J. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(22): 2277−2284. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Wang G, Yu H Y, Ye Y B. A scheme for multisource interior tomography[J]. Med Phys, 2009, 36(8): 3575−3581. doi: 10.1118/1.3157103

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Xu Q, Yu H Y, Mou X Q, et al. Low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction via dictionary learning[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2012, 31(9): 1682−1697. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2195669

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Yu W, Wang C X, Nie X Y, et al. Image reconstruction for few-view computed tomography based on ℓ0 sparse regularization[J]. Procedia Comput Sci, 2017, 107: 808−813. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.178

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Donoho D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52(4): 1289−1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] Zhang W K, Zhang H M, Wang L Y, et al. Limited angle CT reconstruction by simultaneous spatial and radon domain regularization based on TV and data-driven tight frame[J]. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A:Accel, Spectrom, Detect Assoc Equip, 2018, 880: 107−117. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.10.056

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Miao J Y, Cao H L, Jin X B, et al. Joint sparse regularization for dictionary learning[J]. Cogn Comput, 2019, 11(5): 697−710. doi: 10.1007/s12559-019-09650-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Li M, Fan Z T, Ji H, et al. Wavelet frame based algorithm for 3D reconstruction in electron microscopy[J]. SIAM J Sci Comput, 2014, 36(1): B45−B69. doi: 10.1137/130914474

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Wang Y L, Yang J F, Yin W T, et al. A new alternating minimization algorithm for total variation image reconstruction[J]. SIAM J Imaging Sci, 2008, 1(3): 248−272. doi: 10.1137/080724265

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Sidky E Y, Kao C M, Pan X C. Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT[J]. J X-Ray Sci Technol, 2006, 14(2): 119−139.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Zhang X F, Liu H B. Linear programming-based reconstruction algorithm for limited angular sparse-view tomography[J]. Opt Lasers Eng, 2021, 140: 106524. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106524

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 连祥媛, 孔慧华, 潘晋孝, 等. 多通道联合的广义总变分能谱CT重建[J]. 光电工程, 2021, 48(9): 210211. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210211

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Lian X Y, Kong H H, Pan J X, et al. Joint multi-channel total generalized variational algorithm for spectral CT reconstruction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(9): 210211. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210211

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Bao P, Zhou J L, Zhang Y. Few-view CT reconstruction with group-sparsity regularization[J]. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng, 2018, 34(9): e3101. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3101

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Jon K, Sun Y, Li Q X, et al. Image restoration using overlapping group sparsity on hyper-Laplacian prior of image gradient[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 420: 57−69. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.08.053

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Liu J, Huang T Z, Selesnick I W, et al. Image restoration using total variation with overlapping group sparsity[J]. Inform Sci, 2015, 295: 232−246. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.041

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Kong J, Lu K S, Jiang M. A new blind deblurring method via Hyper-Laplacian prior[J]. Procedia Comput Sci, 2017, 107: 789−795. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.170

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Boyd S P, Parikh N, Chu E, et al. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers[J]. Found Trends Mach Learn, 2011, 3(1): 1−122.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Hunter D R, Lange K. A tutorial on MM algorithms[J]. Am Stat, 2004, 58(1): 30−37. doi: 10.1198/0003130042836

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Kong H H, Liu R, Yu H Y. Ordered-subset split-Bregman algorithm for interior tomography[J]. J X-Ray Sci Technol, 2016, 24(2): 221−240. doi: 10.3233/XST-160547

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • X-ray computed tomography (CT) is an imaging technique to obtain the across section information of an object through X-ray projection measurement at different angles, which has been widely used in industry, clinical diagnosis and other fields. However, additional X-ray radiation during clinical examination can lead to cancer and other genetic changes. In order to reduce the dose of X-ray radiation, sparse angle projection is used to add the scanning interval and reduce the number of projection times, and a small amount of projection data is used to achieve image reconstruction. However, this method will reduce the quality of the reconstructed image, there will be more artifacts and noise, and it is difficult to meet the requirements of industrial and medical diagnosis. In order to improve the quality of reconstructed images under sparse sampling, a sparse angle CT reconstruction algorithm based on overlapping group sparsity and hyper-Laplacian prior is proposed in this paper. The sparse regular term of the overlapping group improves the sparsity of the image gradient. The structure information of the image gradient is used as the measurement standard of the image gradient sparsity, which fully considers the gradient information of the pixel neighborhood, and regroups the gradient information by two norms to increase the difference between the smooth region and the image edge region. Since the gradient of the image basically follows the heavy-tailed distribution, the hyper-Laplacian prior can accurately approximate the heavy tail distribute-on of the image gradient, this regular term can suppress the noise generated in the reconstruction process. Combining the advantages of the two regular terms, the algorithm can effectively overcome the staircase artifacts while recovering the edge of the image, and remove the noise generated in the reconstruction. In this paper, alternate direction multiplier method, principal component minimization method and gradient descent method are used to solve the objective function. The experimental data of the simulated mouse model and the clinical mouse model were used in this study. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) and structural similarity index (SSIM) were used as indicators to evaluate different algorithms, and regions of interest were added to compare the reconstructed images, so that the differences of different algorithms could be more clearly seen from the structural details of the mouse model. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has some improvements in preserving the details of image structure and suppressing noise and staircase artifacts in the process of image reconstruction.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(7)

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views() PDF downloads() Cited by()

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint