Xia W Q, He Q N, Duan Q W, et al. Equivalent acceleration feedforward based on sensor optimization and robust prediction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(11): 210153. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210153
Citation: Xia W Q, He Q N, Duan Q W, et al. Equivalent acceleration feedforward based on sensor optimization and robust prediction[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2021, 48(11): 210153. doi: 10.12086/oee.2021.210153

Equivalent acceleration feedforward based on sensor optimization and robust prediction

    Fund Project: National Natural Science Foundation of China (61905253)
More Information
  • In a class of photoelectric tracking systems with only the target image sensor and MEMS accelerometer installed, an equivalent acceleration feedforward control method can improve the tracking ability of the system effectively. However, due to the low-frequency noise of accelerometers, the delay of the synthetic trajectory and the uncertainty of the movement model, the tracking accuracy will be limited. Therefore, in this paper, an equivalent acceleration feedforward method based on sensor optimization and robust prediction is proposed to further improve the tracking ability of the system. The frequency-domain fusion using the accelerometer measurement and the calculated acceleration can optimize the low-frequency performance of the accelerometer. Meanwhile, the robust prediction algorithm can reduce the impact of the delay of the synthetic trajectory and the uncertainty of the movement model and give more accurate feedforward acceleration. The experiment shows that this method can further improve the tracking ability of 0.1 Hz~ 4.5 Hz.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 刘京, 邓永停, 李洪文. 基于级联滑模控制的高精度光电跟踪与捕获[J]. 光学精密工程, 2020, 28(2): 350–362.

    Google Scholar

    Liu J, Deng Y T, Li H W. High-precision photoelectric acquisition and tracking based on cascade sliding mode control[J]. Opt Precis Eng, 2020, 28(2): 350–362.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 李治国, 高立民, 张博妮, 等. 空间光电跟踪系统动量平衡设计与试验[J]. 光学精密工程, 2013, 21(1): 62–68.

    Google Scholar

    Li Z G, Gao L M, Zhang B N, et al. Design and experiment of momentum balance wheels for optoelectric tracking gimbals[J]. Opt Precis Eng, 2013, 21(1): 62–68.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 唐涛, 马佳光, 陈洪斌, 等. 光电跟踪系统中精密控制技术研究进展[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(10): 200315. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200315

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Tang T, Ma J G, Chen H B, et al. A review on precision control methodologies for optical-electric tracking control system[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2020, 47(10): 200315. doi: 10.12086/oee.2020.200315

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Ulich B L. Overview of acquisition, tracking, and pointing system technologies[J]. Proc SPIE, 1988, 887: 40–63. doi: 10.1117/12.944208

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Wang C C, Hu L F, Wang Y K, et al. Time delay compensation method for tip-tilt control in adaptive optics system[J]. Appl Opt, 2015, 54(11): 3383–3388. doi: 10.1364/AO.54.003383

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] He Q N, Luo Y, Mao Y, et al. An acceleration feed-forward control method based on fusion of model output and sensor data[J]. Sens Actuators A: Phys, 2018, 284: 186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.10.031

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 孙健. 动态高型控制方法在光电经纬仪跟踪伺服系统中的应用研究[D]. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院(长春光学精密机械与物理研究所), 2004

    Google Scholar

    Sun J. Study on application of dynamic high type method in tracking servo system of theodolite[D]. Changchun: Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, China, 2004

    Google Scholar

    [8] 邢启江, 董二宝, 陈娟, 等. 光电经纬仪伺服系统动态高型控制[J]. 电光与控制, 2007, 14(3): 140–143 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2007.03.038

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Xing Q J, Dong E B, Chen J, et al. Dynamic high-type control for the servo system of an photoelectric theodolite[J]. Electron Opt Control, 2007, 14(3): 140–143 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2007.03.038

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Ma J S, Kang M S, Kwon W H, et al. Time delay compensation of the image sensor in electro-optical tracking system[J]. J Sens Sci Technol, 1998, 7(1): 23–30.

    Google Scholar

    [10] Cao Z, Chen J, Deng C, et al. Improved smith predictor control for fast steering mirror system[J]. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 2017, 69(1): 012085.

    Google Scholar

    [11] Tang T, Deng C, Yang T, et al. Error-based observer of a charge couple device tracking loop for fast steering mirror[J]. Sensors, 2017, 7(3): 479.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 徐田荣, 阮勇, 赵志强, 等. 基于误差的观测器在光电跟踪系统中的应用(英文)[J]. 光电工程, 2020, 47(11): 190713 doi: 10.12086/oee 2020 190713

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Xu T R, Ruan Y, Zhao Z Q, et al. Error-based observer control of an optic-electro tracking control system[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2020, 47(11): 190713 doi: 10.12086/oee 2020 190713

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 黄永梅, 马佳光, 付承毓. 目标速度预测在光电跟踪控制系统中的应用[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2004, 33(5): 477–481 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2004.05.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Huang Y M, Ma J G, Fu C Y, Application of forecast of moving target velocity in electro-optical tracking control system[J]. Infrared Laser Eng, 2004, 33(5): 477–481 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2004.05.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] Tang T, Tian J, Zhong D J, et al. Combining charge couple devices and rate sensors for the feedforward control system of a charge coupled device tracking loop[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(7): 968. doi: 10.3390/s16070968

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Sani M H, Saghaei H, Mehranpour M A, et al. A novel all-optical sensor design based on a tunable resonant nanocavity in photonic crystal microstructure applicable in MEMS accelerometers[J]. Photonic Sens, 2021, 11(4): 457–471. doi: 10.1007/s13320-020-0607-0

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Bernstein J. An overview of MEMS inertial sensing technology[J]. Sensors, 2003, 20(2): 14–21.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Liu Y, Zhao Y L, Wang W Z, et al. A high-performance multi-beam microaccelerometer for vibration monitoring in intelligent manufacturing equipment[J]. Sens Actuators A: Phys, 2013, 189: 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2012.08.033

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Liu H B, Zhou T. Robust state estimation for uncertain linear systems with random parametric uncertainties[J]. Sci China Inf Sci, 2017, 60(1): 012202. doi: 10.1007/s11432-015-0327-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [19] Rubinstein R Y, Kroese D P. Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method[M]. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Tian J, Yang W S, Peng Z M, et al. Inertial sensor-based multiloop control of fast steering mirror for line of sight stabilization[J]. Opt Eng, 2016, 55(11): 1116022.

    Google Scholar

  • Overview: Photoelectric tracking systems are extensively applied in aerospace, astronomical observation, target tracking, adaptive optics, and other scientific fields. The image sensor CCD (Charge-coupled device) used to detect the target usually has a non-negligible time delay, which severely limits the closed-loop bandwidth and tracking ability of the system. The composite control method based on input feedforward can theoretically improve the tracking ability of the system without changing the stability of the system. Therefore, this method is the main method used in actual engineering. To improve the tracking ability of a class of photoelectric tracking systems with only the target image sensor and accelerometer installed, this paper proposes an equivalent acceleration feedforward control method based on sensor optimization and robust prediction filtering. The ideal feedforward control requires real-time and accurate state information of the target, such as position, velocity, and acceleration. However, CCD can only provide the time-delayed target line-of-sight (LOS) error. To obtain the global trajectory information of the target relative to the tracking platform, additional sensors are needed to provide the position information of the tracking platform itself. As the accelerometer has a phenomenon of "noise submergence" at low-frequency, it will seriously affect the accuracy of synthetic target trajectory at low-frequency. Since the acceleration calculated by the system acceleration model is more accurate at low-frequency, a method of frequency-domain fusion using the calculated acceleration and the accelerometer measurement is proposed. In this method, the low-frequency information of the acceleration calculated by the acceleration model and the mid-and-high-frequency information of the accelerometer measurement data are combined for frequency-domain fusion, and a more accurate platform acceleration in low-frequency is obtained. Then, the fused acceleration and the LOS error detected by the CCD are used to synthesize the target trajectory. Meanwhile, considering the uncertainty of the target motion model and the time delay of the synthetic target trajectory, this paper proposes to use a robust prediction filtering method to replace the traditional Kalman filtering method to predict the target acceleration. The design method and recursive procedure of the proposed robust prediction filter are given in detail. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, this paper designs verification experiments in a two-axis photoelectric tracking experimental system. The experimental results show that using the target trajectory synthesized by optimized accelerometer data to achieve equivalent acceleration feedforward can effectively improve the tracking ability of 0.1 Hz~3.5 Hz. Using the robust prediction filtering method to replace the Kalman filter to predict the target acceleration can further improve the tracking ability of 0.1 Hz~4.5 Hz. Therefore, the proposed equivalent acceleration feedforward control method based on sensor optimization and robust prediction filtering can effectively improve the tracking ability of the photoelectric tracking system concerned by this article.

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(8)

Article Metrics

Article views() PDF downloads() Cited by()

Access History
Article Contents

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint