Citation: |
|
[1] | 刘博, 张景旭, 王富国, 等. 2m SiC主镜Kinematic侧支撑方法设计与优化[J].光电工程, 2016, 43(12): 46–51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2016.12.008 Liu B, Zhang J X, Wang F G, et al. Design and optimization of kinematic lateral support on 2m SiC primary mirror[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2016, 43(12): 46–51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2016.12.008 |
[2] | 包奇红, 沙巍, 陈长征, 等.空间SiC反射镜背部中心支撑特性[J].光子学报, 2017, 46(2): 0222003. Bao Q H, Sha W, Chen C Z, et al. Characteristics of rear support in centre for space SiC mirror[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2017, 46(2): 0222003. |
[3] | 张博文, 王小勇, 赵野, 等.天基大口径反射镜支撑技术的发展[J].红外与激光工程, 2018, 47(11): 1113001. Zhang B W, Wang X Y, Zhao Y, et al. Progress of support technique of space-based large aperture mirror[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1113001. |
[4] | 杜俊峰, 张林波, 任戈. 1.3m主镜的支承设计[J].光学 精密工程, 2007, 15(10): 1483–1488. Du J F, Zhang L B, Ren G. Mounting system design for 1.3 m primary mirror[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2007, 15(10): 1483–1488. |
[5] | 高明辉, 王忠素, 杨劲松, 等.大口径反射镜水银带支撑结构物理参数分析[J].光学 精密工程, 2004, 12(4): 18–20. Gao M H, Wang Z S, Yang J S, et al. Physical parameter analysis of mercury tube mounting structure for large-aperture mirror[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2004, 12(4): 18–20. |
[6] | 刘国庆, 马文礼.大口径轻质镜支撑的有限元分析[J].光电工程, 2001, 28(5): 14–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2001.05.004 Liu G Q, Ma W L. The finite element analysis for large-aperture lightweight mirror mount[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2001, 28(5): 14–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2001.05.004 |
[7] | 周宇翔, 沈霞.空间反射镜背部双脚架柔性支撑结构设计[J].激光技术, 2017, 41(1): 141–145. Zhou Y X, Shen X. Structure design of backside bipod flexure mount for space reflector[J]. Laser Technology, 2017, 41(1): 141–145. |
[8] | 王克军, 董吉洪, 宣明, 等.空间遥感器大口径反射镜的复合支撑结构[J].光学 精密工程, 2016, 24(7): 1719–1730. Wang K J, Dong J H, Xuan M, et al. Compound support structure for large aperture mirror of space remote sensor[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016, 24(7): 1719–1730. |
[9] | 李慎华, 关英俊, 辛宏伟, 等.大口径空间反射镜轻量化设计及其柔性支撑[J].激光与红外, 2017, 47(11): 1422–1427. Li S H, Guan Y J, Xin H W, et al. Lightweight design and flexible support of large diameter mirror in space camera[J]. Laser & Infrared, 2017, 47(11): 1422–1427. |
[10] | 约德.光机系统设计[M]. 3版.周海宪, 程云芳, 译.北京: 机械工业出版社, 2008. Yoder R R Jr. Opto-Mechaoical Systems Design[M]. 3rd ed. Zhou H X, Cheng Y F, trans. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2008. |
[11] | 张珑, 叶璐, 张金平, 等. 1.2m轻量化空间反射镜的重力支撑变形分离[J].光子学报, 2018, 47(7): 0722002. Zhang L, Ye L, Zhang J P, et al. Gravity and support error separation of 1.2 m lightweight space mirror[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2018, 47(7): 0722002. |
Overview: Laser communication has the advantages of high communication rate, good confidentiality, and strong anti-interference ability, and it has become a rapidly developing new mode of communication. The satellite-ground laser communication link mainly realizes the high-speed transmission of satellite massive data. Large-caliber laser communication optical terminal is an important terminal to ensure the link performance in the satellite-ground link, and directly impacts on link communication performances. As the core component of the optical antenna of the ground station. The primary mirror surface shape accuracy directly determines the optical quality of the system. The main mirror lateral support plays a decisive role in the mirror surface shape accuracy.
The primary mirror of the laser communication vehicle ground optical terminal uses microcrystalline materials. Consideration of costs, the primary mirror lightweight design is not necessary, because the optical terminal has no strict requirements for quality. The primary mirror of laser communication stations is heavy, and its working angle changes constantly. In order to decrease the mirror surface figure, the support structure needs to meet both axial and radial gravity unloading requirements.
In order to ensure the accuracy of the surface shape, the support system not only has a 9-pose axial support structure but also simultaneously balances the radial component of gravity of the primary mirror. Flexible lateral support structures have large size and stress, so it is not suit for the mirror that works a in wide range of rotation. In this paper, in order to balance the radial gravity component of the primary mirror and reduce the size of the radial support structure, a combination of the central axis and the mercury belt is designed to balance the radial gravity component of the primary mirror. In the radial support scheme, the finite element analysis was used to analyze the influence of mercury belt parameters on the surface shape accuracy of the primary mirror. The support parameters were optimized, and the support structure was designed.
For the 600 mm microcrystalline primary mirror of the laser communication station, a composite radial support structure is designed, in which the method of combining the mercury band with the central support is adopted on the basis of the back 9-point support. The support position and structure parameters of mercury band were analyzed and optimized. After the actual application to the optical antenna primary mirror support of the laser communication ground station, the actual measurement results of the primary mirror assembly show that the designed support structure enables a surface shape error and RMS value of the primary mirror smaller than λ/5 and λ/37, respectively. The radial support fully achieves the design goal, satisfying the surface error requirements of the laser communication primary mirror.
Photograph of the primary mirror
Flexible support of the primary mirror
Radial pressure distribution (MPa)
Mirror-shaped error at different axial support positions
Mandrel diagram
Vertical deformation of the primary mirror
Mirror-shape error at different angles
Mirror-shape error detection
Mirror-shape error detection results