Citation: | Lv J, Duan X L, Chen X. Edge feature and detail-aware network integrated YOLOv8s algorithm for hip joint keypoint detection[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2025, 52(3): 240281. doi: 10.12086/oee.2025.240281 |
[1] | Bradley C S, Verma Y, Maddock C L, et al. A comprehensive nonoperative treatment protocol for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants: a prospective longitudinal cohort study[J]. Bone Joint J, 2023, 105-B(8): 935−942. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B8.BJJ-2023-0149.R1 |
[2] | Alrashdi N, Alotaibi M, Alharthi M, et al. Incidence, prevalence, risk factors, and clinical treatment for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip in Saudi Arabia. a systematic review[J]. J Epidemiol Glob Health, 2024, 14(3): 549−560. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00217-5 |
[3] | Fujii M, Kawano S, Ueno M, et al. Clinical results of periacetabular osteotomy with structural bone allograft for the treatment of severe hip dysplasia[J]. Bone Joint J, 2023, 105-B(7): 743−750. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B7.BJJ-2023-0056.R1 |
[4] | Dornacher D, Lutz B, Fuchs M, et al. Acetabular deficiency in borderline hip dysplasia is underestimated by lateral center edge angle alone[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2023, 143(7): 3937−3944. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04652-6 |
[5] | Iyengar K P, Fitzpatrick J D, Michalos M, et al. Birmingham royal orthopaedic hospital (BROH) femoral offset—an ancillary measure of adult dysplasia of the hip[J]. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2023, 33(4): 471−477. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769501 |
[6] | McQuivey K S, Secretov E, Domb B G, et al. A multicenter study of radiographic measures predicting failure of arthroscopy in borderline hip dysplasia: beware of the Tönnis angle[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(7): 1608−1615. doi: 10.1177/0363546520914942 |
[7] | Li Q, Zhong L, Huang H N, et al. Auxiliary diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip by automated detection of sharp's angle on standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(52): e18500. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018500 |
[8] | Liu C B, Xie H T, Zhang S C, et al. Misshapen pelvis landmark detection by spatial local correlation mining for diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip[C]//Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, 2019: 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_49. |
[9] | Al-Bashir A K, Al-Abed M, Sharkh F M A, et al. Algorithm for automatic angles measurement and screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH)[C]//Proceedings of 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015: 6386–6389. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319854. |
[10] | Rana M, Bhushan M. Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection[J]. Multimed Tools Appl, 2023, 82(17): 26731−26769. doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w |
[11] | Liu C B, Xie H T, Zhang S C, et al. Misshapen pelvis landmark detection with local-global feature learning for diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2020, 39(12): 3944−3954. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3008382 |
[12] | Wu H, Xie H T, Liu C B, et al. CircleNet for hip landmark detection[C]//Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 34 : 12370–12377. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6922. |
[13] | Lv J, Che J L, Chen X. CBA-YOLOv5s: a hip dysplasia detection algorithm based on YOLOv5s using angle consistency and bi-level routing attention[J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2024, 95: 106482. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106482 |
[14] | Xu W Z, Shu L Q, Gong P, et al. A deep-learning aided diagnostic system in assessing developmental dysplasia of the hip on pediatric pelvic radiographs[J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 9: 785480. doi: 10.3389/FPED.2021.785480 |
[15] | Xu J Y, Xie H T, Tan Q F, et al. Multi-task hourglass network for online automatic diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. World Wide Web, 2023, 26(2): 539−559. doi: 10.1007/s11280-022-01051-0 |
[16] | Kim N. Computational modelling for surgical planning of hip dysplasia[D]. Auckland: the University of Auckland, 2023. |
[17] | Rahmawati S, Devita R, Zain R H, et al. Prewitt and canny methods on inversion image edge detection: an evaluation[J]. J Phys: Conf Ser, 2021, 1933(1): 012039. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012039 |
[18] | Tian B, Wei W. Research overview on edge detection algorithms based on deep learning and image fusion[J]. Secur Commun Networks, 2022, 2022(1): 1155814. doi: 10.1155/2022/1155814 |
[19] | Xie S N, Tu Z W. Holistically-nested edge detection[C]//Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2015: 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.164. |
[20] | Kong L Y, Wang F B, Yang F Y, et al. FISRCN: a single small-sized image super-resolution convolutional neural network by using edge detection[J]. Multimed Tools Appl, 2024, 83(7): 19609−19627. doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-15380-3 |
[21] | Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, et al. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection[C]//Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.91. |
[22] | Lin T Y, Dollár P, Girshick R, et al. Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017: 936–944. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.106. |
[23] | Liu S, Qi L, Qin H F, et al. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation[C]//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018: 8759–8768. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00913. |
[24] | Cui Y N, Ren W Q, Knoll A. Omni-kernel network for image restoration[C]//Proceedings of the 38th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 38 : 1426–1434. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27907. |
[25] | Zheng J W, Shao A H, Yan Y D, et al. Remote sensing semantic segmentation via boundary supervision-aided multiscale channelwise cross attention network[J]. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2023, 61: 4405814. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3292112 |
[26] | Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015: 448–456. |
[27] | Pan J Y, Zhang Y J. Small object detection in aerial drone imagery based on YOLOv8[J]. IAENG Int J Comput Sci, 2024, 51(9): 1346−1354. |
[28] | Xu L Y, Zhao Y F, Zhai Y H, et al. Small object detection in UAV images based on YOLOv8n[J]. Int J Comput Intell Syst, 2024, 17(1): 223. doi: 10.1007/s44196-024-00632-3 |
[29] | 谢竞, 邓月明, 王润民. 改进YOLOv8s的交通标志检测算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2024, 50(11): 338−349. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068742 Xie J, Deng Y M, Wang R M. Improved traffic sign detection algorithm based on YOLOv8s[J]. Comput Eng, 2024, 50(11): 338−349. doi: 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0068742 |
[30] | Wang C Y, Yeh I H, Mark Liao H Y. YOLOv9: learning what you want to learn using programmable gradient information[C]//Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1. |
[31] | Muhammad W, Aramvith S, Onoye T. Multi-scale Xception based depthwise separable convolution for single image super-resolution[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(8): e0249278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249278 |
[32] | 王燕, 王宏辉, 刘树东, 等. 多级特征筛选和任务动态对齐的声呐图像小目标检测[J]. 光电工程, 2024, 51(10): 240196. doi: 10.12086/oee.2024.240196 Wang Y, Wang H H, Liu S D, et al. Small target detection in sonar images with multilevel feature screening and task dynamic alignment[J]. Opto-Electron Eng, 2024, 51(10): 240196. doi: 10.12086/oee.2024.240196 |
Hip dysplasia is a common orthopedic disease in newborns, and timely and precise diagnosis is critical for optimal patient outcomes. In clinical diagnosis, specific key points on hip joint X-ray images are typically annotated, followed by the calculation of the acetabular index through angular measurements based on these points using goniometric tools. The diagnosis is then determined in combination with the age of the patient. However, manual annotation of key points in the hip joint not only demands that clinicians possess robust professional expertise and extensive clinical experience but also renders the process highly time-consuming and susceptible to subjective bias. Therefore, there is an urgent need for precise and automated key points detection technology to assist doctors in diagnosis. However, traditional template matching methods exhibit poor robustness and generalization when processing complex hip X-ray images, especially when faced challenges such as illumination changes, occlusions, and image rotations. To address these issues, researchers have enhanced the attention mechanism and extracted detailed information around key points using deep learning techniques, thereby improving the accuracy of key points localization. Nonetheless, these methods overlook the significance of bone edge information in assisting recognition and struggle with identifying local neighborhood key structural features, which limits further improvements in localization accuracy. To resolve these problems, an edge feature and detail-aware network integrated with the YOLOv8s algorithm for hip joint key points detection is proposed in this paper. This algorithm introduces an edge feature enhancement module to capture spatial features around key points and enhance the edge features of the bones where they are located. The module is applied multiple times during the feature extraction process of the network to progressively strengthen edge features and guide the network to focus on the key points edge areas. In addition, a detail-aware network is proposed to perform feature fusion and optimization on feature maps at different levels, enhancing the network's ability to capture important fine structures within the local neighborhood of key points. The algorithm was experimentally tested on the hip joint X-ray image dataset provided by the Department of Imaging of the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University. The results demonstrate that the average localization error and average angular error for key points have been reduced to 4.2090 pixel and 1.4872°, respectively, representing reductions of 6.8% and 9.9% compared with YOLOv8s, and significantly outperforms existing methods. The experimental findings confirm that the proposed algorithm effectively enhances the accuracy of key point detection, offering valuable insights for clinical diagnosis.
Diagnostic reference for developmental dysplasia of the hip[8]
Overall network structure diagram of EDA-YOLOv8s
Structural diagram of EFEM module
Comparison diagram of three neck network structures in YOLOv8s. (a) Neck; (b) Small-neck; (c) DAN
Structural diagram of DSFM module
Structure diagram of CSP-OKM module and associated submodules. (a) CSP-OKM; (b) FSAM; (c) DCAM; (d) OKM
Heatmaps of hip X-ray image after different improved modules. (a) YOLOv8s; (b) YOLOv8s+EFEM; (c) YOLOv8s+DAN; (d) EDA-YOLOv8s
The relationship diagram between APE and AAE after using different improvement modules
Experimental results of successful detection rate of keypoint
Comparison of keypoint localization error distribution. (a) YOLOv8s; (b) EDA-YOLOv8s
Visualization comparison of detection results between EDA-YOLOv8s and YOLOv8s
Visualization comparison of keypoint angle between EDA-YOLOv8s and YOLOv8s. (a) YOLOv8s; (b) EDA-YOLOv8s